LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

The Telangana Public Examinations (Prevention of Malpractice and Unfair means) Act, 1997.

Telangana · state statute
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this act
THE TELANGANA PUBLIC EXAMINATIONS (PREVENTION OF 
MALPRACTICES AND UNFAIR MEANS) ACT, 1997. 
(ACT NO. 25 OF 1997) 
ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 
Sections 
1. Short title, extent and commencement. 
2. Definitions. 
3. Prohibition of the use of unfair means. 
4. Unauthorised possession and disclosure of question 
paper. 
5. Prevention of leakage by person entrusted with 
examination work. 
6. Prevention of manipulation of evaluation or record of 
such evaluation. 
7. Prevention of inducement for admission. 
7A. Prevention of publication of false or misleading 
information. 
8. Penalty. 
9. Penalty for Offence with preparation to cause hurt etc., 
10. Punishment for neglect of duties. 
11. Offences by companies. 
12. Forfeiture of property of certain persons. 
13. Power to give directions. 
14. Protection of action taken in good faith. 
15. Act to override other laws. 
16. Power to make rules. 
17. Repeal of Ordinance. 
 
THE TELANGANA PUBLIC EXAMINATIONS (PREVENTION 
OF MALPRACTICES AND UNFAIR MEANS) ACT, 1997.1 
 
ACT No.25 OF 1997. 
 
1. (1) This Act may be called the 2Telangana Public 
Examinations (Prevention of Malpractice and Unfair means) 
Act, 1997. 
 
 (2) It extends to the whole of the State of 2Telangana. 
 
 (3) Section 12 shall come into force with immediate 
effect and the remaining sections shall be deemed to have  
come into force with effect from 28th April, 1997. 
 
2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,- 
 
 (a) “Examination Centre” means any institution or part 
thereof or any other place fixed for the holding of a public 
examination and includes the entire premises attached 
thereto; 
 
 (b) “Government” means the State Government of 
2Telangana; 
 
 (c) “Notification” means a notificatio n published in the 
2Telangana Gazette and the word „notified‟ shall be 
construed accordingly; 
 
                                                           
1. The Andhra Pradesh Public Examinations (Prevention of Malpractice s 
and Unfair means) Act, 1997  received the assent of the Governor on the 
19th August, 1997. The said Act in force in the combined State, as on 
02.06.2014, has been adapted to the State of Telangana, under section 
101 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 (Central Act 6 of 
2014) vide. the Telangana Adaptation of Laws Order,  2016, issued in 
G.O.Ms.No.45, Law (F) Department, dated 01.06.2016. 
2. Substituted by G.O.Ms.No.45, Law (F) Department, dated 01.06.2016. 
Short title, extent 
and 
commencement. 
Definitions. 
2  [Act No.25 of 1997] 
 (d) “Prescribed” means prescribed by rules made by 
the Government under this Act; 
 
 (e) “Public Examination” means any examination either 
qualifying or competitive conducted by the Government or 
any other authority or body or any university under any law 
for the time being inforce for awarding or granting any 
degree, diploma, certificate or any other academic 
distinction or for qualifying for admission into any course of 
study or for selecting for appointment or regularisation or 
promotion to any post in public service and includes any 
other examination declared by the Government by 
notification to be a public examination. 
 
 Explanation: For the purp oses of this clause, the 
expression, „Public Service‟  means services in any office or 
establishment of,- 
 
 (a) the Government; 
 
 (b) a local authority; 
 
 (c) a corporation or undertaking wholly owned or 
controlled by the State Government; 
 
 (d) a body established under any law made by the 
Legislature of the State whether incorporat ed or not, 
including a University; 
 
 (e) any other body established by the State 
Government or by a  society registered under any law 
relating to the registration of societies for the time being in  
force, and receiving funds from the State Government either 
fully or partly for its maintenance or any educational 
institution whether registered or not but receiving aid from 
the Government; 
 
[Act No.25 of 1997]  3 
 (f) “Unfair means” in relation to an examinee appearing 
in a public examination means the unauthorised help from 
any person in any manner or from any material written, 
recorded, printed or reproduc ed in any form whatsoever or 
the unauthorised use of any telephonic, wireless or 
electronic or other instrument or gadget in any manner; and 
 
 (g) all words and expressions used but not defined in 
this Act shall have meanings assigned to them in the 
3Telangana Education Act, 1982, or as the case may be, in 
the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 
 
3. The use of unfair means at or in of the use connection 
with any public examination by any person is hereby 
prohibited. 
 
4. No person who is not lawfully authorised  or permitted 
by virtue of his duties so to do shall, before the time fixed for 
the examinees to leave an examination centre at a public 
examination,- 
 
 (a) procure or attempt to procure or possess, such 
question paper or any portion or a copy thereof; or 
 
 (b) impart, or offer to impart information which he 
knows or has reason to believe, to be related to, or derived 
from, or to have a bearing upon such question paper. 
 
5. No person who is entrusted with any work pertaining to 
a public examination shall, except where he is permitted by 
virtue of his duties so to do, directly or indirectly divulge or 
cause to be divulged or make known to any other person 
any information or part thereof which  has come to his 
knowledge by virtue of the work being so entrusted to him. 
                                                           
3. Adapted by G.O.Ms.No.15, Higher Education (TE) Department, dated 
23.04.2015. 
Prohibition of the 
use of unfair 
means. 
Unauthorised 
possession and 
disclosure of 
question paper. 
Prevention of 
leakage by 
person entrusted 
with examination 
work. 
Act 1 of 1982. 
Central Act 45 of 1860. 
4  [Act No.25 of 1997] 
6. No person shall directly or indirectly indulge or involve 
in any manipulation or attempted manipulation  of the 
evaluation of the performance of an examinee at a public 
examination or the record of such evaluation. 
 
 Explanation:- For the purposes of this section, the 
expression „record of evaluation‟ includes answer scripts, 
tabulation sheets, marks registers, individual mark sheets, 
result sheets, or the copies thereof or any other registers or 
records maintained in this behalf. 
 
7. No person connected with an educational instit ution or 
a tutorial institution  shall offer or promise any gu arantee of 
performance of success at a public examination in advance 
as an inducement for admission into such  educational 
institution or tutorial institution. 
 
4[7A. No person connected with an educational institution or 
a tutorial institution shall publish false or misleading 
information relating to the success of its students in a  public 
examination. 
 
 Explanation:- For the purpose s of this section, an 
advertisement or other mode of publicity:- 
 
 (i) c laiming that any student belongs to a particular 
educational or tutorial institution to which such  student was 
never admitted; or 
 
 (ii) showing against a candidate any rank other than 
the r ank assigned to him/her by the C onvenor of a public 
examination while declaring the results of such examination, 
shall be construed as false or misleading information.] 
 
                                                           
4. Inserted with marginal heading by Act No.27 of 2006. 
Prevention of 
manipulation of 
evaluation or 
record of such 
evaluation. 
Prevention of 
inducement for 
admission. 
Prevention of 
publication of 
false or 
misleading 
information. 
[Act No.25 of 1997]  5 
8. Whoever contravenes or attempts or conspires to 
contravene or abets the contravention of the provisions of 
section 3 or section 4 or section 5 or section 6 or section 7  
5[or section 7A] shall be punishable with imprisonment for a 
term which shall not be less than three years but which may 
extend upto seven years and with fine which shall not be 
less than rupees five thousand, but which may extend  upto 
rupees one lakh. 
 
9. Whoever commits an offence punishable under section 
8 having made preparation for causing death of any person 
or causing hurt to a ny person or assaulting any person or 
wrongfully restraining any person or for putting any person 
in fear of death or hurt or assault or wrongful restraint shall 
be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not 
be less than five years but which m ay extend upto ten years 
and with fine which shall not be less than rupees ten 
thousand but which may extend upto rupees one lakh. 
 
10. Whoever being en trusted with any work or has to 
perform any duty pertaining to a pu blic examination wilfully 
neglects such work or duty required to be performed by him 
shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall 
not be less than six months but which may extend upto 
three years and with fine which shall not be less than rupees 
five thousand, but which may extend upto rupees one lakh. 
 
11. (1) Where an offence against any of the provisions of 
this Act or any rule made thereunder  has been committed 
by a company, every person, who at the time the offence 
was committed was in -charge of , and was responsible to 
the company for the conduct of business of the company, 
as well as the company, shall be deemed to be guilty of the  
offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and 
punished accordingly: 
                                                           
5. Inserted by Act No.27 of 2006. 
Penalty. 
Penalty for 
offence with 
preparation to 
cause hurt etc., 
Punishment for 
neglect of duties. 
Offences by 
companies. 
6  [Act No.25 of 1997] 
 Provided that nothing contained in this sub -section 
shall render any such person liable to any punishment, if he 
proves that the offence was committed without his 
knowledge or that he had exercised all due diligence to 
prevent the commission of such offence. 
 
 (2) Notwithstanding anything in sub -section (1) where 
any such offence has been committed, by a company and it 
is proved that the offence has been committed with the 
consent or connivance of or is attributable to any neglect on 
the part of any director, manager, secretary or other officer 
of the company, such director, manager, secretary or other 
officer shall be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall 
be liable to be  proceeded against and punished 
accordingly. 
 
 Explanation:- For the purpose of this section,- 
 
 (a) „Company‟ means any body corporate and includes 
a firm, a society or other association of individuals; and 
 
 (b) „director‟ in relation to,- 
 
  (i) „a firm‟ means a partner in the firm; 
 
  (ii) „a Society or other association of individua ls‟ 
means the person who is entrusted, under the rules of the 
society or other association, with management of the affairs 
of the society or other association, as the case may be. 
 
12. (1) where a person has been convicted of any offence 
under this Act, the Court may, in addition to awarding any 
punishment, by order in writing, declare that any property 
movable or immovable or both belonging to the person, 
which has been or appears to have been or believed to have 
been used for or involved in or procured or acquired or 
Forfeiture of 
property of certain 
persons. 
[Act No.25 of 1997]  7 
obtained by the commission of that offence, shall stand 
forfeited to the Government. 
 
 (2) Where any person is accused of any offence under 
this Act, it shall be open to the Court having jurisdiction to 
try the case to pass an order that all or any of the properties, 
movable or immovable or both, belonging to the person, 
shall, during the period of and until the conclusion of such 
trial, be attached, and where such tria l ends in conviction, 
the properties so attached shall be liable to forfeiture to the 
Government to the extent it is required for compensating the 
Government of the expenditure incurred for conducting the 
public examination again, in respect of which the offenc e 
has been committed,  cancelling such public examination 
conducted earlier due to such offence and for the purpose 
of realisation of any fine imposed under this Act. 
 
13. The Government or any officer or authority specifically 
empowered by the Government by order in this behalf may 
give directions to any educational institution or tutorial 
institution or any officer, or other person to give effect to any 
of the provisions o f this Act or any rule or order made 
thereunder and such directions shall be complied with. 
 
14. No suit, prosecution or other legal proceedings shall lie 
against the Government or any officer or authority of 
Government or any other person for anything which is in 
good faith done or intended to be done under this Act or the 
rules or orders made thereunder. 
 
15. The provisions of this Act shall have effect 
notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in 
any other law for the time being in force. 
 
16. (1) The Government may by notification, make rules for 
carrying out all or any of the purposes of this Act. 
Power to give 
directions. 
Protection of 
action taken in 
good faith. 
Act to override 
other laws. 
Power to make 
rules. 
8  [Act No.25 of 1997] 
 (2) Every rule made under this Act shall immediately 
after it is made, be laid before the Legislature of the State, if 
it is in session and if it is not in session in the session 
immediately following for a total period of fourteen days 
which may be comprised in one session or in two 
successive sessions, and if, before the expiration of the 
session in which it is so laid or the session immediately 
following, the Legislature agrees in making any modification 
in the rule or in the annulment of the rule, the rule shall, from 
the date on which t he modification or annulment is notified, 
have effect only in such modified form or shall stand 
annulled as the case may be so, however, that any such 
modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the 
validity of anything previously done under that rule. 
 
17. The Andhra Pradesh Public Examinations (Prevention 
of Malpractices and Unfair means) Ordinance, 1997 is 
hereby repealed. 
 
* * * 
Repeal of 
Ordinance 7 of 
1997. 

‹ Prev All Telangana acts Next ›