LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

The ODISHA EYES (AUTHORITY FOR USE FOR THERAPEUTIC PURPOES) ACT, 1985

Odisha · state statute
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this act
*THE ORISSA EYES (AUTHORITY FOR USE FOR
THERAPEUTIC PURPOES) ACT, 1985
Orissa Act 13 of 1985
[Received the assent of the Governor on the 3rd October 1985 first published in an
extraordinary issue of the Orissa Gazette, dated the 9th October 1985]
AN ACT TO PROVIDE FOR THE USE OF EYES OF DECEASED PERSONS FOR
THERAPEUTIC PURPOSES AND FOR MATTERS CONNECTED THEREWITH
Be it enacted by the Legislature, of the State of Orissa in the Thirty-sixth
Year of the Republic of India, as follows:
1.  (1) This Act may be called the Orissa Eyes (Authority for use for
Therapeutic Purposes) Act, 1985.
(2) It extends to the whole of the State of Orissa.
2. Definition.:- In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,"
(a) "near relative", in relation to a deceased person, means any person
related to him as spouse, parent, son, daughter, brother or sister
and includes any other person who is related to him"
(i)  by lineal consanguinity Within three degrees or by collateral
consanguinity within six degrees; or
(ii) by marriage with any of the relatives aforesaid:
Explanation- The expressions "lineal consanguinity" and "Collateral consan
guinity" shall have the meanings respectively- assigned to them in the Indian
Succession Act.1925 and degrees of relationship shall be computed in the manner
laid down in that Act,
(b) "prescribed" means prescribed by rules made under this Act;
(c) "registered medical practitioner (ophthalmic)" means a medical
practitioner who possesses any recognised medical qualification
as defined in clause
(d) of section 2 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 and possesses
a post-graduate qualification in Ophthalmology or a certificate
* Published vide Orissa Act 13 of 1985
The Odisha   Gazette
EXTRAORDINARY
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
No. Date : 9th October 1985
Short title and
extent.:
Definitions
39 of 1925
102 of 1956
2
showing that he had received training in enucleation procedure in
the Ophthalmic Department of a hospital or teaching institution for
therapeutic purposes approved by the S tate Government in this
behalf and who is enrolled on a State Medical Register as defined in
clause (k) of the said section.
3. (1) If any person had, either in writing or orally, in the presence of two or
more witnesses (at least one of whom is a near relative of such person)
unequivocally authorised, at any time before his death, the use of his eyes, after
his death, for therapeutic purposes (such person being hereafter in this ' sub-
section referred to as the donor), the person lawfully in possession of the dead
body of the donor shall, unless he has any reason to believe that -the - donor had
subsequently revoked the authorisation aforesaid, grant to a registered medical
practitioner (ophthalmic) all reasonable facilities for the removal, for the therapeutic
purposes, of the eyes-from the dead body of the donor:-
(2) Where no such authorisation as is referred to in sub-section (1) was
made by any person before his death but no objection was also (expressed by
such person to his eyes being used after his death for therapeutic purposes the
person lawfully in possession of the body of the deceased person may unless he
has reason to believe that any hear relative of the deceased person has objection
to the deceased person's byes, being used for therapeutic purposes authorise
the removal of the eyes of the deceased person for their use for therapeutic
purposes.
(3) The authority give n under sub-section (1) of the case may be, under
sub-section (2) shall be sufficient warrant for the removal, for therapeutic purposes
of the eyes from the body of the deceased person but no such removal shall be
made by any person other than a registered medical practitioner (ophthalmic)
who had satisfied himself before such removal, by a personal examination of the
body from which eyes are tier be removed, that life is extinct in such body.
4.  (1) No facilities shall be granted under sub-section (1) of section 3 and
no authority shall be given under sub-section (2) of that section for the removal of
eyes from the body of a diseased person if the person required to grant such
facilities or empowered to give such Authority, has reason to believe that an
inquest may be required to be held in relation to such body in pursuance of the
provisions of any law for the time being in force.
(2) No authority for the removal of eyes from the body of a deceased
person shall be given by a person to whom such body has been entrusted solely
for the purpose of interment, cremation or other disposal.
5. Authority for removal of eyes in case or unclaimed bodies in hospital or
prison.
(1) In the case c-f a dead body lying in a hospital or prison and not claimed
by any of the near relatives of the deceased person, the authority for removal of
the eye from the dead body which so remains unclaimed may be given, subject
to the provisions of sub-section (2) in the prescribed form, by the person in
Authority
for
removal of
eyes of
deceased
persons.
Removal of
eyes not to be
authorised in
certain cases
3
charge, for the time being of the management of control of the hospital or prison,
or by an employee of such hospital or prison, authorised in this behalf by the
person in charge of the management or control thereof.
(2) The authority referred to in sub-section (1) shall not be given except
after the expiry of :
(i) half an hour from the time of the death of the concerned person, in
cases where no facility for cold storage of the dead body is available
is the hospital or prison; or
(ii)  two hours from the time of the death of the concerned person, in
cases where facility for cold storage of the dead body is available in
the hospital or prison.
(3) No authority shall be given under sub-section (1) if the person
empowered to give such authority has reason to believe that any near relative of
the deceased is likely to claim the dead body even though such near relative has
not come forward to claim the body of the deceased within the time, specified in
clause (i) or, as the case may be, clause (ii) of sub-section (2).
Explnation- For the purposes of this section, "hospital" includes a nursing
home medical or teaching institution for therapeutic purpose or other like
institution.
6.  Where the body of a person has been sent for post-mortem examination:
(a) for medico-legal purposes by reason of the death of such person
having been caused by accident or any other unnatural cause; or
(b) for pathological purposes the person competent under this Act to
give authority for the removal of the eyes from such dead body may,
if he has reason to believe that the eyes will not be required for the
purpose for which such body has been sent for post-mortem
examination, authorise the removal for therapeutic purposes of the
eyes of such deceased person provided that he is satisfied that the
deceased person had pot expressed; before his death, any objection
to his eyes being used for therapeutic purposes after his death or,
where he had granted an authority for the use of his eyes for
therapeutic purposes after his death such authority had not been
revoked by him before his death.
7.  After the removal of the eyes from the body of the deceased person,
the registered medical practitioner (ophthalmic) shall take such steps for the
preservation of the eyes so removed as may be prescribed.
8.  (1) Nothing in the foregoing provisions of this Act shall be construed as
rendering unlawful any dialing with the body or with any part of the body of a
deceased person if such dialing would have been lawful if this Act had not been
passed.
(2) Neither the grant of any facility or authority for the removal of eyes from
the body of a deceased parson in accordance with the provisions of this Act nor
Authority for
removal of
eyes from
bodies sent
for post
mortem
examination
for medico-
legal or
pathological
purposes
Preservation of
eyes removed
from dead
bodies.
Savings.
4
the removal of eyes from the body of a deceased person in pursuance of such
authority shall be deemed to be an offence punishable under section 297 of the
Indian Penal Code.
9.  No suit, probation or other legal proceeding shall lie against any person
for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done under this - Act.
10.  (1) The Orissa Corneal Grafting Act, 1960 is hereby repealed.
(2) Notwithstanding such repeal anything done or any action taken (including
any authority granted) under the said Act, shall be deemed to have been done or
taken under this Act.
11. (1) The State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette,
make rules for carrying out the provisions of this Act.
(2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing
power, such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:
(a) the form in which removal of eyes from unclaimed bodies may be
authorised, as required by section 5;
(b) the preservation of removed eyes, as required by section 7;
(c) the publicity which may be given to the provisions and objects of
this Act;
(d) any other matter which is required to be or may be prescribed.
Protection of
action taken in
good faith.
Repeal and
savings
Power to
make rules.
45 of 1860
 Orissa Act
1 of 1960

‹ Prev All Odisha acts Next ›