LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

The Mahul Creek (Extinguishment of Rights) Act, 1922.

Maharashtra · state statute
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this act
1922 : Bom. IV]  1 
THE MAHUL CREEK (EXTINGUISHMENT OF RIGHTS) ACT, 1922 
[Text as on 7th June 2024] 
β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€” 
CONTENTS 
PREAMBLE. 
SECTIONS. 
 1.  Short title. 
 2.  Extinguishment of rights. 
 3.  Compensation to be awarded for loss or damage caused by extinction of rights. 
  SCHEDULE 
 
 
 
2  The Mahul Creek (Extiguishment of Rights) Act, 1922   [1922 : Bom. IV 
1922 : Bom. IV] The Mahul Creek (Extiguishment of Rights) Act, 1922   3 
LIST OF AMENDMENT ACTS 
 1.  Amended by Bom.  16 of 1927  
4 The Mahul Creek (Extiguishment of Rights) Act, 1922   [1922 : Bom. IV 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
1922 : Bom. IV] The Mahul Creek (Extiguishment of Rights) Act, 1922   5 
BOMBAY ACT No. IV OF 19221 
[THE MAHUL CREEK (EXTINGUISHMENT OF RIGHTS) ACT, 1922.] 
[20th May 1922]  
WHEREAS, it is expedient to facilitate the laying by the Trustees of the Port of Bombay of a new 
oil pipe line to the oil pier at Trombay ;  
And whereas for the proper laying and protection of the said pipe line it is necessary to keep the 
drawbridge now maintained by the Port Trust Railway over the Mahul Creek permanently closed and 
thus to cut off from access to the sea a portion of the said creek ;  
And whereas it is therefore necessary to extinguish all 2* * * rights of navigation in the said creek 
over and above the site of the said bridge ;  
And whereas the previous sanction of the Governor -General required by clauses ( e) and ( f) or 
sub-section (3) of section 80-A of the Government of India Act (5 and 6 Geo. 5 c 61) has been obtained 
for the passing of this Act; It is hereby enacted as follows :β€”  
1.  Short title.β€” This Act may be called the Mahul Creek (Extinguishment of Rights) Act, 1922.  
2.  Extinguishment of rights. β€” From the first day of June all 3* * * rights o f navigation in that 
part of the Mahul Creek which lies over and above or to the north of the drawbridge now to be kept 
permanently closed by the Trustees of the Port of Bombay, and spanning the said creek at a point 
specified in the Schedule hereto, shall be extinguished.  
3.  Compensation t o be awarded for loss or damage caused by extinction of rights. β€”  
(1) On the passing of this Act, th e Collector of Bombay shall com mence to take order for award of 
compensation for any loss or damage caused to any person by the extinction of such rights, in the same 
manner, as nearly as may be, as if he had been directed under section 7 of the Land Acquisition Act, 
1894 (I of 1894), to take order for the acquisition of land.  
(2) Compensation shall be determined and awar ded in accordance, as nearly as may be, with the 
provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894  (I of 1894), by the said Collector, or, if his award is not 
accepted, by the Court.  
SCHEDULE 
(See section 2) 
The site of the drawbridge is about 600 feet, measured along the western edge of the Mahul 
Creek, to the north of the centre line of the Pakdi Creek, as shown on City Survey Sheet No. 587, and 
900 feet measured along the western edge of the Mahul Creek to the south of the centre line of the 
Chandani Creek, as shown on City Survey Sheet No. 589. It is approximately 730 feet to the east of the 
old Tower situate near the Laxman Govind Salt Pan Works as shown on City Survey Sheet No. 587. 
                                                   
1  For Statement of Objects and Reasons, see Bombay Government Gazette, 1922, Part V, page 2.  
2  The words β€œtidal rights and” were repealed by Bom. 16 of 1927. This repeal shall be deemed to have been made and to 
have had effect from the date on which Bom. 4 of 1922 came into operation : 
      Provided that if a claim for compensation for loss of tidal rights has been preferred before the Collector of Bombay 
and the claim has not been adjudicated upon when this Act comes into force, the time during which the proceedings were 
pending before the Collector shall be excluded in calculating limitation for any suit that may be filed hereafter for 
damages for interference with such tidal rights. See Bom. 16 of 1927, s. 3. 
3  The words β€œtidal rights and” were repealed by Bom. 16 of 1927. This repeal shall be deemed to have been made and to 
have had effect from the date on which Bom. 4 of 1922 came into operation : 
      Provided that if a claim for compensation for loss of tidal rights has been preferred before the Collector of Bombay 
and the claim has not been adjudicated upon when this Act comes into force, the time during which the proceedings were 
pending before the Collector shall be excluded in calculating limitation for any  suit that may be filed hereafter for 
damages for interference with such tidal rights. See Bom. 16 of 1927, s. 3. 
 

‹ Prev All Maharashtra acts Next ›