LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

The KERALA JOINT HINDU FAMILY SYSTEM (ABOLITION) Act, 1975

Kerala · state statute
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this act
1
THE KERALA JOINT HINDU FAMILY SYSTEM (ABOLITION)  Act, 1975
(ACT 30 OF 1976)
CONTENTS
Preamble.
Sections:
1. Short title, extent and commencement.
2. Definition.
3. Birth in family not to give rise to rights in property.
4. Joint tenancy to be replaced by tenancy in common.
5. Rule of pious obligation of Hindu son abrogated.
6. Liability of  Members of Joint Hindu family for debts contracted before Act not affected.
7. Repeal.
Schedule.
2
THE KERALA JOINT HINDU FAMILY SYSTEM (ABOLITION) ACT, 1975 * 
(ACT 30 OF 1976)
An Act to abolish the joint family system among Hindus in the State of Kerala.
Preamble.—WHEREAS it is expedient to abolish the joint family system among
Hindus in the State of Kerala;
    BE it enacted in the Twenty-sixth Year of the Republic of India as follows:— 
1.  Short title, extent and commencement .—(1) This Act may be called the Kerala
Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Act, 1975.
(2) It extends to the whole of the State of Kerala.
(3)  It  shall  come  into  force  on  such  date  as  the  Government  may,  by
notification in the Gazette, appoint.
2  Definition.—In this  Act,  "Joint  Hindu  Family"  means  any Hindu family  with
community of property and includes—
(1) a tarwad or thavazhi governed  by the Madras Marumakkathayam Act,
1932, the Travancore Nayar Act, II of 1100, the Travancore Ezhava Act, III of 1100, the
Nanjinad  V ellala  Act  of  1101,  the  Travancore  Kshatriya  Act  of  1108,  the  Travancore
Krishnanvaka Marumakkathayee Act, VII of 1115, the Cochin Nayar Act, XXIX of 1113, or
the Cochin Marumakkathayam Act, XXXIII of 1113;
(2) a kutumba or kavaru governed by the Madras Aliyasanthana Act, 1949;
(3) an illom governed by the Kerala Nambudiri Act, 1958; and
(4) an undivided Hindu family governed by the Mitakshara law.
3.  Birth  in  family  not  to  give  rise  to  rights  in  property.—On  and  after  the
commencement of this Act, no right to claim any interest in any property of an ancestor
during his or her life-time which is founded on the mere fact that the claimant was born in the
family of the ancestor shall be recognised in any court.
4.  Joint tenancy to be replaced by tenancy in common .—(1) All members of an
undivided Hindu Family governed by the Mitakshara law holding any coparcenary property
on the day this Act comes into force shall, with effect from that day, be deemed to hold it as
tenants-in-common as if a partition had taken place among all the members of that undivided
Hindu family as respects such property and as if each one of them is holding his or her share
separately as full owner thereof:
Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall affect the right to maintenance
or the  right to marriage or funeral expenses out of the coparcenary property or the right to
* Received the assent of the President on the 10 th day of August, 1976 and published in the Kerala
Gazette Extraordinary No. 484  dated 17th August, 1976.
3
residence, if any, of the members of an undivided Hindu family, other than persons who have
become entitled to hold their shares separately, and any such right can be enforced as if this
Act had not been passed.
(2) All members of a Joint Hindu Family, other than an undivided Hindu
family referred to in sub-section (1), holding any joint family property on the day this Act
comes into force, shall, with effect from that day be deemed to hold it as tenants-in-common,
as if a partition of such property per capita had taken place among all the members of the
family  living  on  the  day  aforesaid,  whether  such  members  were  entitled  to  claim  such
partition or not under the law applicable to them, and as if each one of the members is
holding his or her share separately as full owner thereof.
5. Rule of pious obligation of Hindu son abrogated .—(1) After the commencement of
this Act, no court shall, save as provided in sub-section (2), recognise any right to proceed
against a son, grandson or great-grandson for the recovery of any debt due from his father,
grandfather or great-grandfather or any alienation of property in respect of or in satisfaction
of any such debt on the ground of the pious obligation under the Hindu law, of the son,
grandson or great-grandson to discharge any such debt.
(2) In the case of any debt contracted before the commencement of this Act,
nothing contained in sub-section (1) shall affect—
(a) the right of any creditor to proceed against the son, grandson or
great-grandson, as the case may be; or
(b) any alienation made in respect of, or in satisfaction of, any such
debt,
and any such right or alienation shall be enforceable under the rule of pious obligation in the
same manner and to the same extent as it would have been enforceable if this Act had not
been passed.
Explanation.—For the purposes of sub-section (2), the expression "son" "grandson",
or "great-grandson" shall be deemed to refer to the son, grandson or great-grandson, as the
case may be, who was born or adopted prior to the commencement of this Act.
6.  Liability of Members of joint Hindu family for debts contracted before Act not
affected.—Where a debt binding on a joint Hindu family has been contracted before the
commencement of this Act by the Karanavan, Yejman, Manager or Kartha, as the case may
be, of the family, nothing herein contained shall affect the liability of any member of the
family to discharge any such debt and any such liability may be enforced against all or any of
the members liable therefor in the same manner and to the same extent as it would have been
enforceable if this Act had not been passed.
7. Repeal.—(1) Save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act, any text,  rule or
interpretation of Hindu Law or any custom or usage as part of that law in force immediately
before the commencement of this Act shall cease to have effect with respect to any matter for
which provision is made in this Act.
4
(2) The Acts mentioned in the Schedule, in so far as they apply to the whole or
any part of the State of Kerala, are hereby repealed.
1[8.Proclamation  IX  of  1124  and  Act  16  of  1961  to  continue  in  force. —
Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or in any other law for the time being in
force, Proclamation (IX of 1124) dated the 29 th June, 1949, promulgated by the Maharaja of
Cochin, as amended by the V aliamma Thampuran Kovilakam Estate and the Palace Fund
(Partition) and the Kerala Joint Hindu Family System (Abolition) Amendment Act, 1978, and
the Valiamma Thampuran Kovilakam Estate and the Palace Fund (Partition) Act, 1961 (16 of
1961), as amended by the said Act, shall continue to be in force and shall apply to the
V aliamma Thampuran Kovilakam Estate and the Palace Fund administered by the Board of
Trustees appointed under section 3 of the said Proclamation.]
THE SCHEDULE
[See section 7 (2))
Acts repealed
(1) The Madras Marumakkathayam Act, 1932 (XXII of 1933);
(2) The Madras Aliyasanthana Act, 1949 (IX of 1949);
(3) The Travancore Nayar Act, II of 1100;
(4) The Travancore Ezhava Act, III of 1100;
(5) The Nanjinad Vellala Act of 1101 (VI of 1101); 
(6) The Travancore Kshatriya Act of 1108 (VII of 1108);
(7) The Travancore Krishnanvaka Marumakkathayee Act, (VII of 1115);
(8) The Cochin Thiyya Act, VIII of 1107;
(9) The Cochin Makkathayam Thiyya Act, XVII of 1115;
(10) The Cochin Nayar Act, XXIX of 1113;
(11) The Cochin Marumakkathayam Act, XXXIII of 1113;
(12) The Kerala Nambudiri Act, 1958 (27 of 1958).
________
1 Inserted by Act 15 of 1978.

‹ Prev All Kerala acts Next ›