The SANTHAL PARGANAS TENANCY (SUPPLEMENTARY PROVISIONS) ACT, 1949

Bihar · state statute
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this act
SANTHAL PARGANAS TENANCY LAWS 
SANTHAL PARGANAS TENANCY (SUPPLEMENTARY PROVISIONS) ACT, 1949 
[Bihar Act XIV of 1949]1 
          [1st April, 1949] 
 An Act to amend and supplement certain laws relating to landlord and tenant in the Santal Parganas. 
 Whereas it is expedient to amend and supplement certain laws relating 
to landlord and tenant in the Santal Parganas. 
 It is hereby enacted as follows: 
 1. Short title, commencement and extent. – (1) This Act may be called 
the Santal Parganas Tenancy (Supplementary Provisions) Act, 1949. 
 (2) It shall come into force on such date as the 2(State) Government 
may by notification, appoint in this behalf. 
 3[(3)  It extends to the whole of Santal Parganas Division comprising of 
4[Dumka,Sahibganj], Godda, Deoghar and Pakur. 
 
  
COMMENT 
        Commencement – The Act came into force on the 1 st Nov. 1949 by 
Notification No.9169 -R, dated 24/09/1949, in Bihar and Orissa Local 
Statutory Rules and Orders, Vol. 1, Part VIII. 
        2.   Power to vary local extent of the Act and ef fect of the withdrawal of 
the Act from any area. – (1) The 1[State] Government may, by notification 
withdraw this Act, of any part thereof, from any portion of the Santal 
Parganas 2[Division] and may likewise extend this Act, or any part thereof to 
the area from which the same has been so withdrawn. 
      (2)    The withdrawal of this Act or any part thereof from any area under 
sub-section (1) shall not, – 
(a)     Affect the previous operation of this Act in such area or anything                                                                      
Duly   done or suffered there under before such withdrawal; or 
(b)     affect any right, privilege, obligation or liability acquired, accrued or 
incurred in such area under this Act before such withdrawal; or 
(c)     affect any penalty, forfeiture or punishment incurred in respect of any 
offence committed under this Act with reference to such area before such 
withdrawal; or 
(d)     Affect any investigation, legal proceeding or remedy in respect of any 
such right, privilege, obligation, liability, penalty, forfeiture or punishment as 
aforesaid; 
And any such investigation, legal proceeding or remedy may be instituted 
continued or enforced and any such penalty, forfeiture or punishment may 
be imposed as if no such withdrawal had been made. 
COMMENTS 
        Section 2–Applicability of Hindu Succession Act. –Provision of Section 
2(2) of Hindu Succession Act lay down that this Act does not apply to 
members of Schedule Tribes. Santals being members of Schedule Tribes. 
Governed by the Customary Law in matters of inheritance and succession. A 
Santal widow cannot make alienation without legal necessity therefor. 
[Banset Manjhi v Raimat Majhiain, 1994 (2) PLJR 582]. 
       Section 2–Applicability of B.L.R Act, 1950. –Bihar Land Re forms Act, 
1950, is validly applicable to all portions of the Santhal Pargans. The 
Provisions of Section 3 of Regulation, 1872 are impliedly repealed as a result 
of the enactment of the the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution of India, and in 
the absence of any notification under clause (5) of Part B of the Schedule, the 
jurisdiction of the Bihar Legislature to legislate for the scheduled area of the  
Santal paragon cannot be doubted. [Bedabala Devi v. State of Bihar, 1953 
BLJR 77: AIR 1954 Pat 159 (DB)]. 
3. Repeal.- The enactments mentioned in Schedule A are hereby repealed to 
the extent specified in the fourth column thereof. 
 
 
COMMENT 
         Sections 3, 27 (1), (3) and 28. - Santhal Paragana Tenancy, 
(Supplementary Provisions) Act, 1949 became applicable from 1st Nov. 1949. 
Section 3 of Act states that enactment mentioned in Schedule ‘A’ are 
repealed to the extent specified in the forth column thereof. Schedule A of 
the Act is listed as one of the Acts the Regulation of the 1872 and the extent 
of the repea l of Regulation was in connection of Sections 27 and 28. One 
Section 27 of the Regulation stood repealed by the Act, question arises 
whether the right which had accrued to purchaser under the Regulation in 
connection with the operation of Section 27 sub -sections (1) and (3) of the 
Regulation was save or not despite the repeal of the said Section 27. At the 
relevant provision shows that no expressed provision in the Act which lays 
down that notwithstanding the order passed or action taken in connection 
with transaction under the regulation, and notwithstanding any right which 
might have accrued there under fresh scrutiny of the said transaction could 
be made under the relevant provision of Act, which corresponded to the 
earlier repealed Section 27 of the Regu lation. When such contrary intension 
does not appear from the scheme of the Act, the effect of repeal of Section 
27 of the Regulation squarely attracts the provision of the Section 8 of the 
Bihar General Clauses Act, 1917.  
[Deonarayan Singh v. Commissioner, Bhagalpur, 1997 (2) BLJR 1352: 1998 (2) 
PLJR (SC) 3]. 
  4. Definitions.-In this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject 
or context,- 
             (i) ‘aboriginal’ means a person who belongs to an aboriginal or semi -
aboriginal tribe or cas te specified in Schedule B and includes a person 
belonging to such other aboriginal or semi -aboriginal tribe or caste as may, 
from time to time, be notified by the 1[State] Government in this behalf; 
(ii) “Agricultural year” means, where the Bengali year p revails, the year 
commencing on the first day of Baisakh, where the Fails year prevails the 
year commencing on the first day of Asin, where any other year prevails for 
agricultural purposes, that year; 
(iii) “bhugut -bandha or complete usufructuary mortgage ” means a transfer 
of the interest of a raiyat in his holding or part of the holding for the purpose 
of securing the payment of money advanced or to be advanced by way of 
loan, upon the condition that the loan, with all interest thereon, shall 
Be deemed to  be extinguished by the profit arising from the holding or part 
of the holding during the period of the mortgage; 
(iv) 1[“Commissioner’ means the Commissioner of the Santhal Parganas 
Division]; 
(v) “Community” means the social group to which a person belon gs and for 
the purposes of this Act there shall be two such groups, aboriginal and non -
aboriginal; 
(vi) “Deputy Collector” includes an Assistant Collector and a Sub -Deputy 
Collector;  
(vii) 2[“Deputy Commissioner” means the Deputy Commissioner of the 
3Dumka, Sahibganj, Godda, Deoghar, Pakur and includes],- 
(a) Additional Deputy Commissioner, Sub -divisional Officer or Deputy 
Collector, empowered by the 4[State] Government to discharge any of the 
functions of Deputy Commissioner under this Act; and  
(b) any D eputy Collector, whom, subject to the control of the 5[State] 
Government, the Deputy Commissioner may, by general or special order, 
authorise to exercise any of his functions under this Act; 
COMMENTS 
          Deputy Commissioner - Prior to the enactment of  the Bihar Santal 
Parganas Vidhi (Amendment) Act, 1984 (which came into force on 
26/05/1984),under clause (vii) of Section 4 Deputy Commissioner for the 
purpose of SPT Act, 1949 means only the Deputy Commissioner of Santal 
parganas. [Hari Ballabh Narain v. State of Bihar, 1991 (1) PLJR 632]. 
        The word “Deputy Commissioner” has been defined in Section 4 (vii) and 
it means and includes “Additional Deputy Commissioner”, Sub -Divisional 
Officer or Deputy Collector empowered by the State Government to 
discharge any of the functions of the Deputy Commissioner under the SPT 
Act, 1949.  
[Probodh Kumar v. Commissioner, 1988 PLJR 811]. 
      Sections 59 and 4, Clause (vii) -Notice under Section 69 of the Act by 
Deputy Commissioner of Deoghar dated 03/02/1984 - Quashing of -Power 
conferred on 26 th May, 1984 - Notice without jurisdiction quashed.  [Hari 
Ballabh Narain v. The State of Bihar, 1991 (1) BLJR 643]. 
 
NOTIFICATION 
   S.O. 12, dated the 6 th January, 1989.- In exercise of the powers conferred 
by section 4 (ii) A of the Santhal Parganas Tenancy (Supplementary Provision) 
Act, 1949 (Bihar Act 14,1949), the Governor of Bihar is pleased to empower 
Shri Ras Bihari Pandey, Additional Collector, Deoghar to discharge the 
function of the deputy Commissioner under the said  Act within the limit of 
his administrative jurisdiction. 
   S.O 14, dated the 6 th January, 1989.- In exercise of the powers conferred by 
Section 4 (ii) A of the Santhal Parganas Tenancy (Supplementary Provision) 
Act, 1949 (Bihar Act 14, 1949) the Governor  of Bihar is pleased to empower 
Shri Ram Bachan Tiwari, Deputy Collector , Deoghar to discharge the function 
of the Sub -divisional officer under the said Act within the limit of his 
administrative jurisdiction till the Sub -divisional Officer is not posted at 
Deoghar. 
   la0 9 losZLFkk0 ¼jk0½ 77@91&2644jk0 & laFkky ijxuk dk’rdkjh ¼vuqiwjd mica/k½ vf/kfu;e] 1949 ¼fcgkj 
vf/kfu;e 14]1949½ /kkjk 4 (VII,) ds v/khu iznÙk ‘kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, fcgkj ds jkT;iky mDr vf/kfu;e 
dh /kkjk 20 ¼V½ 
,oa 42 ds vUrxZr Jh  jke fuokl ‘kkL=h] izHkkjh inkf/kdkjh] nqedk cUnkscLr dks muds vf/kdkfjrk {ks= nqedk] 
xksM~Mk] nso?kj ,oa lkgscxat esa mik;qDr dh ‘kfDr;ksa dk mi;ksx djus ds fy, izkf/kd`r djrs gSa]] 
(viii)        “Holding” means a parcel or parcels of land held by a raiya t and                  
forming the subject of a separate tenancy” 
(ix)           “khas village” means a village in which there is no mulraiyat nor for 
the time being any village headman irrespective of whether there was or was 
not previously a mulraiyat or village headman in the village; 
(x)           “landlord” means a person other than the village headman or 
mulraiyat entitled to receive rent and includes a proprietor, a tenure -holder, 
a ghatwal and the 1 Government; 
(xi)           “non -aboriginal” means a person who does not belong to any 
aboriginal or semi -aboriginal tribe or caste specified in Schedule B or to any 
other aboriginal or semi -aboriginal tribe or caste notified by the 2[State] 
Government under clause (i) of Section 4; 
(xii)       “prescribed ” means prescribed by rules made by the 3[State] 
Government under this Act; 
(xiii)            “raiyat” means a person not being a landlord, who has acquired a 
right to hold land for the purpose of cultivating it by himself or by members 
of his family or by  hired servants; and includes the successor in interest of a 
person who has acquired such a right; 
 
Explanation. – A village headman shall be deemed to be a raiyat in respect of 
his private holding if any. 
(xiv)         “Recorded” means recorded in the record-of-rights; 
(xv)         “Rent” means whatever is lawfully payable in money by– 
                 (a) a village headman or mulraiyat of a village to the landlord of 
that village in accordance with the record- of-rights hereinafter referred to as 
village rent, or 
(b) a raiyat, on account of the use or occupation of the land held by him to h 
is landlord, either directly or through a village headman or mulraiyat as the 
case may be, and includes all dues (other than personal services) which are 
recoverable under any law for the time being in force as if they were rent; 
(xvi) “Santal Civil Rules” means the directions issued by the 1[State] 
Government for observance in the administration of civil justice in the Santal 
Parganas by officers appointed  under Clause  (2) Section 1 of the Santal 
Parganas Act, 1855 (37 of 1855). 
2[(xvii) “Santhal Parganas” means the Santal Parganas Division comprising of 
Dumka, Sahibganj, Godda and Deoghar districts.] 
(xviii) “Settlement rate of rent’ means the rate of rent mentioned as  
settlement rate in the record-of-rights. 
3[(xix) “tenant’’ includes a tenure-holder, village headman and mulraiyat;] 
(xx) “Vacant holding” means an abandoned holding or holding of which the 
raiyat has died without heirs; 
(xxi) “Village” means,- 
    (a) th e area defined, surveyed and recorded as a distinct and separate 
village in the map and record -of-rights prepared under any law for the time 
being in force, and  
(b) Where a survey has not been made and a record -of- rights has not been 
prepared under any s uch law, such area as the Deputy Commissioner may, 
with the sanction of the Commissioner, by general or special order, declare 
to constitute a village: 
Provided that when an order has been passed under Section 9 of the Santal 
Parganas Settlement Regulation (Reg.3 of 
 
1872) directing that a survey be made and record -of- rights prepared in 
respect of the whole or any part of the Santali Pagans, the 1[State] 
Government may by notification, declare that in such area ‘village’ shall 
mean the area which for the p urposes of such survey and record -of- rights 
may be adopted by the Settlement Officer, subject to the control of the 
Commissioner, as the unit for making the survey and preparing the record -
of-rights; 
(xxii) “village community means the body of all the jam abandi raiyats of a 
village, their co-sharers, children and heirs; and  
(xxiii) “village headman” means the person appointed or recognised whether 
before or afte the commencement of this Act by the Deputy Commissioner 
or other duly authorised officer to ho ld the office of a village headman 
whether known as pradhan, mustajur, manjhi or otherwise, but does not 
include a mulraiyat. 
COMMENT 
 Sections 4 (ix) and 5 - Appointment of Headman -Election under Section 5 of 
the Act -Hereditary succession when applicable -held, principle of hereditary 
succession is applicable only when incumbent dies and his successor 
available- In case where incumbent resigbned voluntarily election to be held 
amongst candidates of same village and not from different village. 
[Sheopuyjan Bhagat v. Thakur Hembrom, 1997 (1) All PLR 51 (SC)]. 
CHAPTER II 
VILLAGE HEADMEN AND MULRAIYATS 
5. Appontment of a village hweadman of a khas village. - On the application 
of a raiyat or of landlord of any khas village and with the consent of at least 
two thirds of the jamabandi raiyats of the village ascertained in the manner 
prescribed, the Deputy Commissioner may declare that a headman shall be 
appointed for the village and shall then proceed to make the appointment in 
the prescribed manner. 
COMMENTS 
  Sections 5 and 6- SPT Supplementary Rules, 1950, Rule 3(5)- New Headman- 
Appointment of- deceased Pradhan died leaving successor - Acceptability of- 
To be ascertained from the will of 2/3 rd of Jamabandi Raiyatasnamely 16 
anna raiyats- Failure to give due notice t o al the Jamabandi raiyats -Decision 
of Deputy Commissioner unsustainable - Set Set aside - Command issued to 
service all the Jamabandi raiyats bty every attempt and thereafter pass 
order.  
   [Mahipal Mishra v.State of Jharkhand, 2003 (2) JCR 401: 2003 (2) J LJR 274 
(Jhr)]. 
        Sections 5 and 6 and Santal Paraganas Tenancy (Supplementary) Rules, 
1950, Rules 3, sub -rule (5) - Pradhan-Appointment of Pradhan -How to be 
made- Claim as appointed to be Pradhan - Is a subject to select a fit person 
for such appointment. [Jagdish Misra v. Chamaklal Mishra, 1965 BLJR 674]. 
 
     Section 5 - If on the date fixed requisite consent of two -third majority of 
the Jamabandi raiyat is not available under rule 3(1) further adjournment 
cannot be allowed, application is liable to be dismissed. [Banke Bihari Lal 
v.Commissioner, 1969 PLJR 492]. 
    Sections 5 and 6 - Santhal Parganas Tenancy (Supplementary) Rules, 1950, 
Rule 3-Appointment of Pradhan - Non-Khas village- Provisions of Section 6 of 
the Act attracted -Office is hereditary i n nature - Next heir who is fit, is 
entitled to be the Headman - Sub divisional Officer competent to ascertain 
the views of Jamabandi raiyats of the village - Earlier matter remanded for 
compliance of Rule 3 on reconsideration –Reconsdiration has to be in ter ms 
of clauses 3 and 4 of the Schedule V of the rules- Single Judge while disposing 
of the writ petition did not understood the scope of remand order made 
earlier- Order modified - Direction issued to Sub -Divisional Officer to 
ascertain the views of the Jama bandi raiyats of village on the question of 
fitness to succeed to the post in terms of clauses 3 and 4 of Schedule V of the 
rules by proceeding uner rule 3(5).  
[Swarnlata Devi v. State of Jharkhand & Ors., 2003 (3) JCR 416 (Jhr)]. 
     Sections 5,6 and 7 and Schedule 5 read with Santhal Parganas Tenancy 
Manual, 1911 (Pages 291 to 299) - Hereditary right in appointment - 
Affirmation by authority as village headman -Resident in village necessary to 
discharge his duties - short visit by headman illegal - Appointment on 
hereditary right of village headman illegal - Direction to initiate proceeding 
for appointment of village headman - illegal- Direction to initiate proceeding 
for appointment of village headman -From a perusal of the headman’s duties 
it is self -evident that for any meaningful discharge of those duties, it would 
be essential for the headman to permanently and regularly reside in the 
village in question and it would not be possible to discharge those duties 
satisfactorily in case he lived outside the villag e on Government postings and 
came to the vfillage only intermittently. The headman has, in fact, a long list 
of duties which can be duly discharged only by a person living in the 
concerned village. Thus, the result of his appointment would be that he 
would be enjoying the social status and prestige and he and his family 
members would be deriving the many benefits attached to that office but he 
would not be discharging most of the duties of the headman. In the light of 
the above discussion, the Court was of the considered view that only a 
person regularly residing in the village can be considered to be a suitable 
candidate for the office of the headman and respondent No. 5 
notwithstanding his hereditary claim, is unfit for the office of headman for 
the simple reason that he is not living there regularly. In the Court’s opinion, 
therefore, the authorities acted erroneously in allowing his claim simply on 
the basis of hereditary right and directing for his appointment as headman. It 
as headman was bad and illegal. Before concluding it is to be observed that it 
has been found that the petitioner too has no hereditary claim to the office 
because his grandfather was dismissed from the office of hard man. The 
Apex Court accordingly direct the Deputy Commissioner, Dum ka to initiate 
proceeding for appointment of village headman for the village in question as 
provided under Chapter 2, read with Schedule 5 of the Act. In case 2/3 rd of 
the Jamabandi raiyats do not give their consent for appointment of a 
headman, the villag e MAY BE CONVERTED INTO A KHAS VILLAGE. [Babulal 
Hembrum v. State of Bihar, 1998 (1) PLJR 43: 1998 (1) ALL PLR 277 (Pat)]. 
 
 
   6.  Landlord to report the death of village headman. –When the village 
headman of a village which is not khas, dies, the landlor d of the village shall 
report the fact within three months of its occurrence to the Deputy 
Commissioner with a view to the appointment of a village headman in the 
prescribed manner. 
COMMENTS 
    Section 6- ‘To elect a village headman’ in Form A under Rule 3 gives a clear 
indication that the appointment of the headman by way of election by the 
raiyats of the village but it is relevant raitat of village means Jambandi raiyat 
without taking into consideration the opinion of the Jamabandi raiyat the 
order is ba d in law.[Jagdish Mishra v. Chamaklal Mishra, 1965 BLJR 674:ILR 
45 Pat 668] 
 
                      Section 6 – It was held that authorities should have first 
considered the case of person claiming right to the post of Pradhan on the 
basis of hereditary cla im. It was pointed out that the procedure of election 
under Section 5 comes only after rejecting the right of hereditary claim. 
[Thakur Hembrom v. State of Bihar, 1980 BLJR 448:1980 BLJ 212 (DB)]. 
                      Section 6- Authorities under this act are bound to considered the 
claim of the post of Pradhan on the basis of hereditary claim first. After 
rejection of this claim the authority can considered the alternative method of 
appointment of Pradhan by election. [Thakur Hembrom v. State of Bihar, 
1980 BLJR 448:1980 BLJ 212 (DB)]. 
                       7. Village headman to be granted patta and to execute kabuliyat 
and furnish security. – (1) A village headman shall on appointment be 
granted a patta, and may be required to execute a kabuliyat in the 
prescribed form. He shall in the discharge of the duties of his office be 
governed by such rules as may be made by the 1[State] Government. 
                        (2)   The village headman on appointment or when record – of- 
rights is being prepared under  the Santal Parganas Settlement Regulation 
(Reg. 3 of 1872} may be required to pledge so much only of his own or the 
family holding or holdings held under the same landlord as woud in the 
opinion of the Deputy Commissioner suffice together with the officia l 
holdings to secure the village rent for one year: 
                        Provided that ordinarily the rent of the official holding, if any 
plus that of the lands pledged as security shall be at least ten per centum of 
the total village rent payable by the village headman: 
                        Provided further that at every appointment of a new village 
head-man, the consent of co -sharers, if any, shall be taken in writing before 
the family holding is pledged as security for village rent. The co -sharers shall 
have the right to have their shares released form security , at any time after 
the first five years, but all arrears ofvillage rent must be paid up in full before 
any share is so released. 
 
 
 
Commnent 
 
                  No other evidence is necessar y for determination of Raiyati 
interest in respect of agricultural land if it is created by settlement or by 
possession for long period and rent receipt is issued in favour of the settle. 
[Samir Kumar Mukherjee v. State of Bihar, 1999 (2) PLJR 409] 
 
                  13. Rights of raiyat in respect of use of land – (1) A raiyat may use 
the lad comprised in his holding,-- 
 (a)      In any manner which is 
authorised by local usage or custom, or 
 (b)      Irrespective of any local 
usage or custom, in any manne r which does not materially impair the value 
of the land or render it unfit for the purpose of cultivation. 
 
            (2)    The doing of anything on the holding that is permitted by Section 
15, Section 16, Section 17, or Section 18 shall not be deemed materially to 
impair to the value of the land or to render it unfit for cultivation. 
            14.  Raiyats not to be ejected by order of the Deputy Commissioner --- 
A raiyat shall not be ejected by the landlord form his holding on the ground 
that he has used his land in a manner not authorised by section 13 except in 
execution of an order of ejectment passed  by the Deputy Commissioner. 
            15.   Raiyat’s right to manufacture tiles and bricks – A raiyat shall have 
the right to manufacture bricks and tiles on his holding, free of any royalty or 
other charge, for the domestic or agricultural purposes of himself and his 
family. 
            16.  Raiyat’s right to construct bandhs, etc. on his own holding and to 
enjoy fish and other produce – A raiyat may construct or excavate on his own 
holding or on land settled with him bands, agars, tanks, wells and the like 
water reservoirs and channels in a reasonable manner and to the extent 
required for drinking or other domestic purposes and purposes of irrigat ion, 
as the case may be, without the permission of the landlord, provided no 
injury is cased to others by such construction or excavation. If there is any 
dispute as to whether or not any injury has been or is likely to be caused to 
any other person by suc h construction or excavation, the Deputy 
Commissioner may decide the same and pass such order as he deems fit and 
proper. The raiyat shall enjor the fist and other produce of such water 
reservoirs and channels free of charge. 
             17. Rights of rai yats in trees on his own holding --- (1) Notwith - 
standing anything to the contrary contained in this Act or any other law or 
anything having the force of law in the Santal Parganas, a raiyat may— 
                   (3)  A village headman shall have the op tion to give at any time 
cash security instead of, or to supplement, the security of his land. The 
Deputy Commissioner shall fix the amount of such cash security which when 
paid shall be palced in revenue deposit. 
             8.    Landlord to supply copi es of jamabandi and record -of-rights to 
newly-appointed village headman. – Whenever a person other than an heir 
of the last village headman is appointed a village headman, it shall be the 
duty of the landlord to supply the village headman with the original  
jamabandi or copies thereof certified in the prescribed manner and the 
record-of-rights of the village within three months from the date of 
appointment. 
           9. Non -transferability of village headman’s office. – The village 
headman shall have no right to transfer his office in any way. 
            10.  Only land recorded as such to be treated as mularaiyat ka jote and 
mulraiyati jote. --- No land which is not recorded as such shall be recognised 
or treated as mulraiyat ka jote (private holding) or as  mulraiyat jote (official 
holding). Any waste land which is reclaimed by a mulraiyat or a co -mulraiyat 
or any vacant holding which is found in the possession of or is settled with a 
mulraiyat or a co -mulraiyat shall be treated as non -transferable raiyati 
holding governed by the provisions of this Act relating to such raiyati 
holdings. 
               11. Headmen’s reward fund. – All fines imposed upon, and realised 
from village headmen, mulraiyat and raiyats under this Act shall be deposited 
in to a fund to be known as the headmen’s reward fund. Management of and 
disbursement from this fund shall be made by the Deputy Commissioner in 
accordance with prescribed rules. 
CHAPTER III 
 
RAIYATS 
                   12. Classes of raiyats – There shall be for the purpo ses of this Act 
the following classes of raiyats, namely, -- 
 
 (a) Resident jamabandi raiyats, 
that is to say, persons recorded as jamabandi raiyats who reside or have 
their family residence in the village in which they are recorded. 
 (b) Non -resident jama bandi 
raiyats, that is to say persons recorded as jamabandi raiyats who do not 
reside or have their family residence in the village in which they are 
recorded. 
 (c) new raiyats, that is to say, 
person recorded as naya raiyats or nutan raiyats. 
 (a) Plant t rees, orchards and 
bamboos on any land in his holding and cut, fell and appropriate the same. 
 (b)  Cut, fell and appropriate 
any trees or bamboos standing on such land : 
 Provided that no mahua tree 
shall be cut without the permission of the Sub-divisional Officer. 
 (c) Appropriate the flowers, 
fruits and other products of any trees or bamboos standing on such land: 
 
 1[Provided that if there is any 
specific entry in the latest record -or-rights regarding any tree or bamboo 
which was standing on any such la nd before the date of the final publication 
of such record-of-rights to the effect that any right in such trees or bamboos 
belongs to any person other than the ladlord of such land, the right of the 
raiyat in such tree of bamboo shall be exercised in accor dance with, any 
subject ot, any such entry.] 
 (2) A raiyat shall have the right 
to grow lac or rear silk cocoon free of charge on trees planted by him on his 
holding. 
 18. Raiyat’s right to erect 
buildings – A raiyat may erect kutcha or pucca buildings on the his holding 
for the domestic or agricultural purposes of himself and his family. 
 19. Division of holding and 
distribution of rent – (1) A holding may be sub -divided and the rent thereof 
distributed with the consent of the landlord and the village head man or 
mulraiyat, if any. 
 (2) When a holding has been 
the subject of partition or sub -division by an order of a Court or otherwise 
and if the parties to the partition are unable to distribute the rent of the 
holding by agreement amongst themselves and wit h the consent of the 
landlord and the village headman or mulraiyat, if any, any of the parties may 
apply to the Deputy Commissioner to distribute the rent of the holding. 
 (3) (a) On receipt of such an 
application, the Deputy Commissioner shall serve on ea ch of the person 
interested in the application, other than the applicant, a notice of the date 
on which he intends to hear the application. 
 Explanation. – For the purposes 
of this clause, the landlord and the village headman or mulraiyat, if any, shall 
be deemed to be persons interested in the application. 
  
 (b) After serving the notice 
required by clause (a) and hearing the parities and holding such enquiry as 
he thinks fit, the Deputy Commissioner. 
 
 
 1. Ins, by kSec. 2 of the Santal 
Parganas (Supplementary Proivisons) Amendment Act, 1951 (Bihar Act 11 of 
1951), for the original proviso. 
 
 Shall distribute the rent of the 
holding calculated on the basisi of settlement rate of rent, and his decision 
shall be final. 
 (4) The order of the Deputy 
Commissioner under sub -section (3) shall take effect from such date as the 
Deputy Commissioner may specify in his order. 
 (5) The Deputy Commissioner 
shall have power to award cost to any party to any proceeding under this 
section, and any sum ordered to be paid as c ost shall be recoverable from 
the party by whom it is payable as a public demand payable to the Deputy 
Commissioner. 
 (6) The Deputy Commissioner 
shall pay any sum recovered as cost by him under sub-section (5) to the party 
to whom such costs are payable. 
 Provided, firstly, that in no case 
shall such holding be sub-divided if the rent of any portion of the holding will 
be less than three rupees. 
 Secondly, that the private 
holding of the village headman pledged as security shall in no case be split up 
if his share together with the official, if any, will not be adequate security for 
the village rent. And 
 Thirdly, that any sub -division or 
partition of the holding or the distribution of its rent shall not have the effect 
of splitting up the joint liability o f faiyats for the payment of the rent of the 
holding as it stood prior to the sub-division or partition. 
 (20) Transfer of raiyat’s rights – 
(1) No transfer by a raiyat of his right in his holding or any portion thereof, by 
sale, gift, mortgage, will, leas e or any other contract or agreement, express 
or implied, shall be valid unless the right to transfer has been recorded in the 
record-of-rights, and then only to the extent to which such right is so 
recorded. 
 Provided that a lease of raiyati 
land in any s ub-division for the purpose of the establishment or continuance 
of an excise shop thereon may be validly granted or renewed by a raiyat for a 
period not exceeding one year, with the previous writt3en permission of the 
Deputy Commissioner. 
 Provided further  that where 
gifts by a recorded Santhal raiyat to a sister and daughter are permissible 
under the Santal Law, such a raiyat may with the previous written permission 
of the Deputy Commissioner, validly make such a gift; 
    Provided also that an 
aboriginal raiyat may, with the previous written permission of the deputy 
Commissioner, make a garnt in respect of him lands not exceeding one fhalf 
of the area of his holding to his widowed mother or to his wife for her 
maintenance after his death. 
 (2) Notwithstand ing any thing 
to the contrary contained in the record -or-rights, no right of an aboriginal 
raiyat in his holding or any portion thereof which is transferable shall be 
transferred in any manner to anyone but a bona fide cultivation aboriginal 
raiyat of the parganan or taluk or tappa in which the holding is situated. 
       
           Provided that nothing in 
this sub-section shall apply to a transfer made by an aboriginal raiyat of his 
right in his holding or portion thereof in favour of his gardi jamai or g har 
jami. 
                 1[ Provided further that 
a raiyat who is a member of aboriginal tribes or aborigine cates may, with 
the previous sanction of the Deputy Commissioner and a raiyat, who is not a 
member of the aboriginal tribes or aboriginal castes may without such 
previous sanction, enter into a simple mortgage in respect of his holding or a 
portion thereof with any Scheduled Bank within the meaning of the Reserve 
Bank of India Act, 1934, or a society or bank registered or deemed to be 
registered under the Bihar and Orissa Co -operative Societies Act, 1935(Bihar 
and Orissa Act VI of 1935) or a financial instituting or with a Company or a 
Corporation owned by or in which not less than fifty one percent of share 
capital is held by the State Government, or the central government, or partly 
by the Central government and which has been set up with a view to provide 
agricultural credit to cultivators.] 
  
    (3) No transfer in 
contravention of sub—section (1) or (2) shall be registered, or shall be in any 
way recognised as valid by any Court, whether in exercise of civil, criminal or 
revenue jurisdiction. 
   (4) No decree or order shall be 
passed by any Court or officer for the sale of the right of a raiyat in his 
holding or any portion thereof, nor shall any  such right be sold in execution 
of any decree or order, unless the right of the raiyat to transfer has been 
recorded in the record -of-rights or provided in this Act and then only to the 
extent to which such right is so recorded or provided. 
   2[Provided that a holding or a 
portion thereof an occupancy raiyat may be sold in accordance with the 
procedure laid down in Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recover Act, 1914 
(B and O. Act 4 of 1914) for the realisation of loans taken from any scheduled 
bank within the meaning of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, or a society 
or bank registered or deemed to be registered under the Bihar and Orissa 
Co-operative Societies Act, 1935 (Bihar and Orissa Act VI of 1935) or 
 
   1. Ins, by Sec. 2 (a) of the 
Santal Pargans T enancy (Supplementary Provisions) Amendment Act, 1975 
(Bihar Act 17 of 1976) Published in Bihar Gazette, Extraordinary, dated 
4.10.1975 Received assent on 13.8.1976 
 2. Ins. Be Sec. 2(b) of Bihar Act 
17 of 1976. 
 
 
 
 
 Financial institution, or a 
company or a corporation owned by or in which not less than fifty -one 
percent of share capital is held by the State Government or the Centre 
government or partly by the State Government and partly by the Central 
government and which has been set up with a view to pro vide agricultural 
credit to cultivators, but if the holding or portion thereof belongs to a raiyat 
who is member of aboriginal tribes or aboriginal castes, it shall not be sold to 
any person who is not a member of the aboriginal tribes or aboriginal castes. 
      1[(5) If at any time it comes to 
the notice of the Deputy Commissioner that a transfer of land belonging to a 
raiyat who is a member of the Scheduled Tribes as specified in Part III of the 
Schedule to the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950 , has taken place 
in contravention of sub -section (1) or (2) or by any fraudulent method 
2[including decrees obtained in suits by fraud or collusion’, he may, after 
giving reasonable opportunity to the transferees, who is proposed to be 
evicted, to show ca use and after making necessary enquiry in the matter 
evict the transferee from such land without payment of compensation and 
restore it to the transferor or his heir, or in the case the transferor or heir is 
not available or is not willing to agree to such  restoration, re -settle it with 
another raiyat belonging to the Scheduled Tribes according to the village 
custom for the disposal of an abandoned holding: 
          Provided that if the 
transferee has within 30 years from the date of transfer, constructed any 
building or structure on such holding or portion thereof, the Deputy 
Commissioner, shall, if the transferor is not willing to pay the value of the 
same, order the transferee to remove the same withing a period of six 
months from the date of the order, or within such extended time not 
exceeding two years from the date of the order as the Deputy Commissioner 
may allow, failing which the Deputy Commissioner may get such building or 
structure removed: 
              Provided further that 
where the Deputy Com missioner is satisfied that the transferee has 
constructed a substantial structure or building on such holding or portion 
thereof before coming into force of the Bihar Scheduled Areas Regulation, 
1969, he may, notwithstanding any other provisions of the Ac t, validate such 
a transfer where the transferee either, makes available to the transferor an 
alternative holding or portion thereof, as the case may be, of the equivalent 
value in the vicinity or pays adequate compensation to be determined by the 
Deputy Commissioner for rehabilitation of the transferor: 
  
 
    Provided also that if after an 
enquiry the Deputy Commissioner is satisfied that the transferee has 
acquired a title by adverse possession and that the transferred land should 
be restored or re -settled, he shall require the transferor or his heir or 
another raiyat, as the case may be to deposit with the Deputy Commissioner 
such sum of money as may be determined by the Deputy Commissioner 
having regard to the amount for which the land was transferred o r the 
market value of the land, as the case may be, and the amont of any 
compensation for improvements effected to land which the Deputy, 
Commissioner may deem fair and equitable] 
  
          1[Explanation.- For the 
purpose of this section a financial institution means,- 
 
            i. a banking company as 
defined in the Banking regulation Act 1949, 
            ii. the State Bank of India 
constituted under the State Bank of India Act, 1955, 
            iii. a subsidiary Bank as 
defined in the State Bank of India) Subsidiary Bank) Act,   1959, 
            iv. a corresponding new 
bank constituted under the banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of 
Undertakings) Act, 1970, 
            v. Agricultural Refinance 
Corporation constituted under the Agricultura l Refinance Corporation Act, 
1963, 
            vi. the Agro - Industries 
Corporation, 
             vii.  the Agricultural 
Finance Corporation Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies 
Act, 1956, and  
           viii.  any other institution 
as may be notified in this behalf as a financial institution by the State 
Government in the Official Gazette.] 
 
COMMENTS 
 
 Section 20 - Applicability of – 
Agricultural land changed to Basauri land - Became transerable- Such transfer 
do not fall within the mischief of Section 20 of the Act. [ Dhena Hansda and 
Ors. V. State of Jharkhand and Ors. 2003(3) JCR 230(jhr)] 
  
         Section 20 - Eviction 
application- Eviction application -Rejected-Appeal against -Order became 
Revision against-Allowed-Evocation application stand rejected-Order became 
final and conclusive -Land acquisition took place more than 60 years prior to 
the filing of eviction application -Transfer thereafter took place in 1938 -
Nature of land changed as basauri land -Not open for the settlement officer 
to declare the acquisition of land illegal merely as provision of Section 53 of 
the S.P.T. Act,1949 has been declared unconstitutional -Acquisition of land in 
year 1937-38 is valid. [Dhena Hansda and Ors. V. State of Jharkhand and Ors, 
2003(3) JCR 130 (Jhr]. 
  Section 20 – Whether the 
Revenue Court has jurisdiction to evict a person who had come in possession 
of the land on the basis of a compromise decree of the civil court if that 
compromise was collusive. It is held, that a transferee cannot perfect his title 
on the basis of collusive decree of a civil Court. Revenue Court has 
jurisdiction to evict the person from the land which is obtained by fraud or 
collusion. [Rajo Mian v. Puram Mian, 1987 BLJR 91]. 
 Section 20(1), 20(2) and 20(5) 
as amended by the Bihar Scheduled Areas Regulation, 1969 (Bihar Regulation 
1 of 1969), State List of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution is not 
volatile of being repugnant to the provisions of Limitation Act. The provisions 
do not ultra virus of the Articles 13,14,19(1) (f) an d 31 of the Constitution as 
being the Section 42 of the Act is a legislatioin   in respect of Entry No. 21 lf 
List II. [Bhauri Lal Jain v. Sub -Divisiional Officer, 1972 PLJR 415 (FB) : AIR 1973 
Pat1]. 
     Section 20(5) as amended by 
Bihar Scheduled Areas Regulation, 1971 Pat 1]. 
 Regulation 1 of 1972) - 
Compromise decree obtained in a suit in contra -venation of the Acts comes 
under the ambit of sub -section (5) of Section 20 of the Act. Revenue 
authorities has jurisdiction to evict the person from the land w hich is a 
transfer by the fraudulent medhod. [Ram Narain Sahv. State of Bihar, 1976 
BLJR 15]. 
    Section 20 - Before the 
enactment of Scheduled Area Regulation, 1969, 
 Deputy Commissioner has no 
jurisdiction to evict a transferee from the land who has perf ected his right 
through continuous possession of 12 years but now under Section 20(5) the 
Deputy Commissioner has wide discretion to evict such transferee. [Kheyali 
Bhaiya v. Bisan Mahton, 1957 BLJR 821]. 
          Sections 20 (5) and 42 - 
There is a distin ction between Section 20(5) land Section 42 -Original raiyat 
will be put in possession under Section 20)5) by the competent authority. But 
under Section 42 no such power is given to the authority. [Deonarain Singh v. 
Commissioner, Bhagalpur Division, 1985 BLJR 185: 
 1985 PL JR 1 (FB)]. 
   
       Sections 20(1), 20(5) and 42 - 
Section 20(1) of the Act runs parallel to the scheme of earlier provisions of  
Section 27(1) of the Regulation, 1872. Therefore the authorities have no 
occasion to invoke the provisions of Section 20(1) or Section 20(5) of the Act 
read with Section 42 thereof in connection of this later transaction of the 
sale dated 26 th June, 1950. [Deonarayan Singh v. Commissioner, Bhagalpur, 
1997 (2) BL JR 1352: 1998 (2) P L J R (SC) 3]. 
        Section 20 - Family partition 
of the family property cannot hit by Section 20 of the Santal Parganas 
Tenancy (Supplementary Provisions) Act, 1949 and Section 27 of the Santall 
Parganas Settlement Regulation, 1872. Mutation order passed by the Circle 
Officer canno t be cancelled without giving opportunity of being heard. 
[Ramjiban Sahah v. State of Bihar, 1978 B L J 337]. 
     Section 20 - In contravention 
of the provisions of Regulation III of 1872 settlement was done, the person is 
coming in continuous possession m ay acquire title by adverse possession. 
Order of eviction cannot be passed against the person who is coming in 
possession prior to the coming into force of this Act. [Godo Mahto v. State of 
Bihar, 1980 BL J 72]. 
 
   Sections 20 - Te provisions of 
sub-sections (1) and (2) of Section 20 of the Act are prospective in operation. 
The provision did not bar acquisition of title by adverse possession. The 
person came in possession through settlement in contravention of provision 
of Section 27 of Regulation iii of 18 72, by remaining in possession over the 
land more than twelve years before the application of eviction was filed. 
[Most. Pairia v. Commissioner, Bhagalpur Division, 1978 B L J 272]. 
     Sections 20- The land belongs 
to a female cannot claim the land inher itance. Land will revert to the heirs of 
her father. [Krishna Prasad Sharma v. State of Bihar, 1998 (3) P L J R 179]. 
     Sections 20 - Occupancy right 
can be acquired by a person by prescriptor of time on the expiry of said 
period. [Suryabansh Upadhyay v. Awdhesh Choudhary, 1999 (2) P L J R 173]. 
     Sections 20 - Limitation from 
12 years to 30 years is only for the members of the non -tribal where there is 
a case between tribal to tribal, the limitatior is twelve years. [Dhani Manjhi v. 
Ranga Manjhi, 1999 (1) PL J R 605] 
    Sections 20 and 42 - The order 
passed by the Revenue Authorities without deciding the disputed points and 
without giving opportunity to the parties concerned is bad in law. The 
revenue authorities are bound to decide the points on the ba sis of evidence 
adduced by the parties. [Ram Lal Tatwa v. State of Bihar, 2000(1) P L J R 4888 
(Pat)]. 
    Sections 20 and 42 - When the 
SDO himself was drawing with conclusion on the order of the dismissal for 
default in the title eviction suit he has comm itted an error without giving

Excerpt shown. Open the full act in Lexace.

‹ Prev All Bihar acts Next ›


Lexace India is a legal-information & technology platform — not a law firm. It does not advertise, solicit work, or provide legal advice, and no advocate–client relationship is created. Bare-act text for general information; verify against the official source.