LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

YASH AHUJA AND OTHERS versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ORS.

Citation: [2009] 14 S.C.R. 667 · Decided: 17-09-2009 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: K.G. BALAKRISHNAN · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2009] 14 (ADDL.) S.C.R. 667 
__,. 
YASH AHUJA AND OTHERS 
A 
-( 
V. 
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ORS. 
" 
(Civil Appeal Nos. 6370 of 2009 Etc. Etc.) 
I( 
( 
SEPTEMBER 17, 2009 
B 
[K.G BALAKRISHNAN, CJI., P. SATHASIVAM AND 
J.M. PANCHAL, JJ.] 
Indian Medical Council Act, 1956: 
c 
s. 12, 13(4-A) (as inserted by Act 34 of 2001), Second 
Schedule - Third Schedule, Part II - Medical qualification 
granted by Universities/Medical Institutions outside India -
Recognition under Scheme of reciprocity by Medical Council 
+ 
of India as medical qualification for purposes of Act - s. 13( 4-
A) prescribing screening test for Indian citizens granted 
D 
medical qualification by named Institutions outside India for 
granting provisional/temporary/permanent registration -
HELD: It had come to notice of Legislature that. a large 
number of private agencies were sponsoring Indian citizens 
E 
for medical studies to institutions outside India, such students 
also included those who did not fulfil the minimum eligibility 
-41 
requirements for admission to medical courses in India -
• Serious aberrations were noticed in the standard of medical 
institutions in some of the foreign countries, which were not 
F 
on par with the standards of medical education in India and, 
as such, Parliament rightly felt necessity of making provision 
to enable MCI to conduct screening test - The date specified 
'II 
by Central Government uls 13(3) being 15.3.2002, an Indian 
citizen granted medical qualification by institutions outside 
India shall not be entitled to be enrolled on Medical Register G 
"'-f in the country after 15. 3. 2002 unless he qualifies the 
screening test - MCI Eligibility Requirement for taking 
admission in an undergraduate medical course in a Foreign 
Medical Institution Regulations, 2002 - Screening Test 
667 
H 
668 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2009] 14 (ADDL.) S.C.R. 
A Regulations, 2002 - Interpretation of statutes - Purposive 
construction/Mischief rule. 
Under the scheme of reciprocity, in terms of s.12 of 
the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956; medical 
8 qualifications granted by Kathmandu University in 
respect of Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara 
and Nepal in or after July 1999 was recognized by the 
Medical Council of India for the purposes of the Act Since 
various private agencies, for commercial considerations, 
sponsored Indian students including those who failed to 
C fulfil the minimum eligibility requirements for admission 
to medical course in India, for medical studies in 
institutions outside India, the Act was amended by 
Medical Council of India (Amendment) Act, 2001 (Act 34 
of 2001 ), inserting s.13(4-A) providing for screening test 
D for a citizen of India who obtained medical qualification 
by an institution in a country outside India; and qualifying 
the screening test was deemed to be the recognised 
medical qualification for the purpose of the Act. As 
several deficiencies in infrastructural, teaching and other 
E facilities were found in Manipal College of Medical 
Sciences, Pokhra, the MCI took a ~ecision to withdraw 
the recognition granted to the College and not to grant 
provisional/final registration to any student passing from 
the said Institute who has not passed the scr.eening test 
F Some of the students of the Manipal College of Medical 
Sciences, Pokhra .who were issued provisional/ 
temporary registration by MCI were denied permanent 
registration on the ground that they had not cleared the 
prescribed screening test They filed writ petitions which 
G were dismissed by the High Court. Aggrieved, they filed 
the appeals. Some othe.r students who were denied 
provisional registration by MCI filed petitions for special 
leave to appeal. Similarly situated students of the Institute 
of Medicine, Tribhuwan University filed the writ petition 
H under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. 
YASH AHUJA AND ORS. v. MEDICAL COUNCIL OF 669 
INDIA & ORS. 
It was contended for the appellants and the writ A 
~ 
petitioners that the Second Schedule and Part II of the 
Third Schedule to the Act exhausted the qualifications 
granted by the medical institutions outside India which 
were recognized .as medical qualifications for the 
purposes of the Medical Council of India Act, 1956 
B 
whereas Sub-Section (4A), (48) and 4(C) of s.13 deal with 
the residual subject of individual recognition of medical 
qualifications obtained by Indian citizens from the 
'-t 
institutions outside India which 

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.