LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

VIPIN SAHNI AND ANOTHER versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Citation: [2024] 4 S.C.R. 308 · Decided: 08-04-2024 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: ANIRUDDHA BOSE · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

cites 3 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

* Author
[2024] 4 S.C.R. 308 : 2024 INSC 284
Vipin Sahni and Another 
v. 
Central Bureau of Investigation
(Criminal Appeal No. 1980 of 2024)
08 April 2024
[Aniruddha Bose and Sanjay Kumar*, JJ]
Issue for Consideration
Whether it is open for High Court to convert or treat a petition 
filed under section 482 Cr.P.C., as one filed under section 397 
Cr.P.C.
Headnotes
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – ss.482 and 397 – 
Special Judicial Magistrate while exercising the power given 
under section 239 Cr.P.C. discharged the appellants – CBI 
approached the High Court under section 482 Cr.P.C. – 
High Court set aside the discharge order and directed the 
learned Special Judicial Magistrate to proceed with the case 
– Appellants preferred appeal against the said impugned 
order – Order of the High court is set aside. 
Held: When the specific remedy of revision under section 397 
Cr.P.C. is available, it could not have been ignored – A petition 
under section 482 Cr.P.C. cannot be filed as an alternative of 
revision. [Para. 25]
Penal Code, 1860 – Criminal Conspiracy – Two or more person 
agrees to, cause to be done i) an Illegal act ii) an act which is not 
illegal by illegal means – No agreement except an agreement 
to commit an offence shall amount to Criminal conspiracy – 
Cheating – An act to cheat and thereby dishonestly induce the 
person so deceived to deliver any property and fraudulent or 
dishonest intention at the time of making the representation 
or promise. 
Held: The sine qua non to make out an offence under section 
420 IPC is an act on part act to cheat and thereby dishonestly 
induce the person so deceived to deliver any property and 
fraudulent or dishonest intention at the time of making the 
representation or promise and such culpable intention should 
[2024] 4 S.C.R. 
309
Vipin Sahni and Another v. Central Bureau of Investigation
be there at the time of entering into the agreement – Ingredients 
required to constitute an offence of cheating are (i) there 
should be fraudulent or dishonest inducement of a person by 
deceiving him; (ii) (a) the person so deceived should be induced 
to deliver any property to any person, or to consent that any 
person shall retain any property; or (b) the person so deceived 
should be intentionally induced to do or omit to do anything 
which he would not do or omit if he were not so deceived; and 
(iii) in cases covered by (ii) (b), the act or omission should be 
one which causes or is likely to cause damage or harm to the 
person induced in body, mind, reputation or property. [Paras 
9, 10, 19, 20 and 26]
Inherent power of the court – Can be exercised when there 
is no remedy provided in the Code of Criminal Procedure for 
redressal of the grievance.
Held: As per the Article 131 in the Schedule to the Limitation 
Act, 1963, the limitation period for filing a criminal revision under 
Section 397 Cr.P.C. is 90 days – However, there is no limitation 
prescribed for invocation of the inherent powers of the High Court 
under Section 482 Cr.P.C – It is well settled that the inherent 
power of the Court can ordinarily be exercised when there is no 
express provision in the Code under which order impugned can 
be challenged – When a revision is lawfully instituted before the 
High Court but the same is thereafter found to be not maintainable 
on some other ground, it would be open to the High Court to 
treat the same as a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C in 
order to do justice in that case – However, the reverse analogy 
may not apply in all cases and it would not be open to the High 
Court to blindly convert or treat a petition filed under Section 482 
Cr.P.C as one filed under Section 397 Cr.P.C., without reference 
to other issues, including limitation. [Paras 23 and 25]
Case Law Cited
Ram Jas v. State of U.P. [1971] 2 SCR 178 : (1970) 2 
SCC 740; V.P. Shrivastava v. Indian Explosives Limited 
and others [2010] 11 SCR 788 : (2010) 10 SCC 361 
– Followed.
Mohit alias Sonu and another v. State of U.P. and another 
[2013] 7 SCR 86 : (2013) 7 SCC 789 – Relied on.
310
[2024] 4 S.C.R.
Digital Supreme Court Reports
List of Acts
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Penal Code, 1860; AICTE 
Approval Process 2006.
List of Keywords
Inherent Power of the Court, Revision, Criminal Conspiracy, 
Cheating, Discharge.
Case Arising From
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Criminal Appeal No. 1980 
of 2024
From the Judgment and Order dated 20.01.2023 of the High Court 
of Judicature at Allaha

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.