LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

VINUBHAI MOHANLAL DOBARIA versus CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR

Citation: [2025] 2 S.C.R. 476 · Decided: 06-02-2025 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: J.B. PARDIWALA · Disposal: Disposed off

cites 2 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2025] 2 S.C.R. 476 : 2025 INSC 155
Vinubhai Mohanlal Dobaria 
v. 
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
(Civil Appeal No. 1977 of 2025)
07 February 2025
[J.B. Pardiwala* and Sanjay Karol, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Whether an offence u/s.276CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 could 
be said to have been committed on the actual date of filing of return 
of income or on the day immediately after the due date for filing 
of returns as per s.139(1) of the Act; what is the meaning of the 
expression “first offence” appearing in Clause 8 of the Guidelines 
for Compounding of Offences under Direct Tax Laws, 2014; what 
amounts to voluntary disclosure for the purpose of Clause 8 of 
the 2014 Guidelines; whether the 2014 Guidelines are mandatory 
or directory in nature. 
Headnotes†
Income Tax Act, 1961 – s.276CC – Compounding of offence – 
Commission of offence, when – Appellant, an individual 
earning income by way of salary and also share of profit of 
partnership firm – Delay in filing the return of income for AY 
2011-12 and 2013-14 by appellant – Issuance of show cause 
notice to the appellant for the AY 2011-12 alleging violation 
of s.276CC – Application for compounding for AY 2011-12 
allowed – Thereafter, the appellant received another show 
cause notice as regards launching of prosecution for the 
AY 2013-2014 – Compounding application for AY 2013-14 
rejected – Writ petition by appellant that his compounding 
application was rejected solely on the ground that the offence 
alleged to have been committed by the appellant of belated 
filing of the return of income for AY 2013-14 was not covered 
by the expression “first offence” as defined in the 2014 
guidelines, rejected by the High Court – Offence u/s.276CC 
could be said to have been committed on the actual date of 
* Author
[2025] 2 S.C.R. 
477
Vinubhai Mohanlal Dobaria v.  
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
filing of return of income or on the day immediately after the 
due date for filing of returns as per s.139(1): 
Held: Offence u/s.276CC could be said to have been committed 
as soon as there is a failure on the part of the assessee in 
furnishing the return of income within the due time as prescribed 
u/s.139(1) – Subsequent furnishing of the return of income by the 
assessee within the time limit prescribed under sub-section (4) of 
s.139 or before prosecution is initiated does not have any bearing 
upon the fact that an offence u/s.276CC has been committed on 
the day immediately following the due date for furnishing return of 
income – Offence u/s.276CC could be said to have been committed 
on the dates immediately following the due date for furnishing the 
return of income for both these assessment years respectively – 
Date for commission of both of these offences would be the day 
falling immediately next to the due date for filing of return, that is 
01.10.2011 for AY 2011-12 and 01.11.2013 for the AY 2013-14 – 
Show cause notice for the AY 2011-12 was issued to the appellant 
on 27.10.2014 – Offence for the AY 2011-12 could be said to have 
been committed on 01.10.2011 and the offence for the AY 2013-
14 could be said to have been committed on 01.11.2013 – Both 
the offences u/s.276CC were committed prior to the date of issue 
of any show cause notice for prosecution – Thus, the offence as 
alleged to have been committed by the appellant u/s.276CC for the 
AY 2013-14 is covered by the expression “first offence” as defined 
under the 2014 Guidelines and thus, the compounding application 
filed by the appellant could not have been rejected – High Court 
erred in rejecting the writ petition filed by the appellant against the 
order passed by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax rejecting 
the application for compounding – Impugned order passed by the 
High Court as well as the order passed by the Chief Commissioner 
of Income Tax set aside – Guidelines for Compounding of Offences 
under Direct Tax Laws, 2014. [Paras 35, 41-43, 69, 70, 81-83]
Income Tax Act, 1961 – ss.276CC, 279 – Failure to furnish 
returns of income – Compounding of Offences – Guidelines 
for Compounding of Offences under Direct Tax Laws, 2014 – 
Paragraph 8 – “First offence” – Meaning of:
Held: “First offence” is any offence committed prior to the date of 
issuance of any show cause notice for prosecution in relation to 
the said offence; or prior to any intimation relating to prosecution by 
the department to the person concerned or prior to the launching 
478
[2025] 2 S.C.R.

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.