VINOD VERMA versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A B C D E F G H 1014 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 6 S.C.R. VINOD VERMA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 14967 of 2017) APRIL 02, 2019 [ASHOK BHUSHAN AND K.M. JOSEPH, JJ.] Telecommunications Engineering Service (Group “B” Posts) Recruitment Rules, 1996 – Post of Sub-Divisional Engineer governed by 1996 Rules – Junior Telecom Officers eligible for promotion under two methods- 75% on the basis of seniority-cum-fitness and 25% on the basis of departmental competitive examination – In 2001, the appellant was promoted as Sub-Divisional Engineer under the seniority-cum-fitness quota – Department announced the Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE) for promotion for the 25% quota for vacancies after 22.07.1996 – Appellant also appeared in the Departmental Competitive Examination – Promotion order issued for the promotion of LDCE successful candidates – Promotions also made against the 75% category for the subsequent years – Seniority list of Sub-Divisional Engineers issued – Challenged in various Benches of Central Administrative Tribunal – In CAT, Chandigarh Bench, case titled Dewan Chand & Ors. vs. Union of India was filed wherein the Tribunal vide order dated 25.08.2009 quashed the seniority list and directed redrawing the seniority list – Appellant was not party to the said case – Appellant filed review petition before the Tribunal – Dismissed on 18.01.2010 – Writ Petition filed by the appellant challenging the orders dated 25.08.2009 and 18.01.2010 – Dismissed – SLP filed by the appellant – Dismissed with liberty to file review application before the High Court – Appellant filed review application – Rejected – On appeal, held: Present appeal is covered by three-Judge Bench judgment of Supreme Court dtd. 12.08.2014 in Rajesh Banta & Ors. vs. Dewan Chand & Ors. and BSNL vs. S.K. Dubey – Against the judgment of Tribunal dated 25.08.2009 in Dewan Chand vs. Union of India, a writ petition was filed in Punjab and Haryana High Court titled Rajesh Banta and others vs. Central Administrative Tribunal and others – Thus, in the said writ petition the same order of the Tribunal dated [2019] 6 S.C.R. 1014 1014 A B C D E F G H 1015 25.08.2009 was under challenge which has been challenged by the appellant herein – Supreme Court vide order dated 12.08.2014, following judgment of the same day in BSNL vs. S.K. Dubey, dismissed the said writ petition which was filed challenging the order of CAT in Dewan Chand – Accordingly, writ petition filed by the appellant is also dismissed – Constitution of India – Art.309 – Service Law. Service Law – Seniority – Determination of, by executive instructions vis-a-vis statutory rules – Held: Determination of seniority can be provided by the Executive instructions if the subject matter is not covered by the statutory rules. Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 A perusal of Telecommunications Engineering Service (Group “B” Posts) Recruitment Rules, 1996 indicates that Rules, 1996 provides for the method of recruitment, age and other qualifications. The Rules which have been brought on record do not contain any provision relating to determination of seniority. The statutory Rules, 1996 being silent on the question of determination of seniority, for determination of seniority OMs dated 22.12.1959, 24.06.1978, 07.02.1986, 03.07.1986 and 07.02.1990 have to be looked into. Determination of seniority can be provided by the Executive instructions if the subject matter is not covered by the statutory rules. [Para 16][1023-B-C] 1.2 The present appeal is covered by three-Judge Bench judgment of Supreme Court dated 12.08.2014. Against the judgment of Tribunal in TA No.84-HR-2009, a writ petition was filed in Punjab and Haryana High Court being CWP No.5133/ CAT of 2010 . Thus, in the said writ petition the same order of the Tribunal dated 25.08.2009 was under challenge which has been challenged by the appellant herein. Supreme Court by the judgment dated 12.08.2014 dismissed the writ petition which was filed challenging the order of the CAT in Dewan Chand. [Para 22][1026-C-D] 1.3 When three-Judge Bench of Supreme Court following the pronouncement in BSNL & Ors. vs. S.K. Dubey & Ors., judgment of the same day, dismissed the writ petition against the VINOD VERMA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. A B C D E F G H 1016 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2019] 6 S.C.R. same very judgment of the CAT of Chandigarh Bench in Dewan Chand vs. Union of India, the fate of this appeal is sealed by the said judgment b
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex