LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

VIJAY PRABHU versus S.T. LAJAPATHIE & ORS.

Citation: [2025] 1 S.C.R. 718 · Decided: 08-01-2025 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: J.B. PARDIWALA, R MAHADEVAN · Disposal: Dismissed

cites 2 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2025] 1 S.C.R. 718 : 2025 INSC 52
Vijay Prabhu 
v. 
S.T. Lajapathie & Ors. 
(Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 25246 of 2023)
08 January 2025
[J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Whether the High Court was justified in finding that the original 
plaintiff was not entitled to discretionary relief of specific 
performance under Section 12 of the Specific Relief Act; whether 
the relinquishment of claim to further performance of the remaining 
part of the contract can be made at any stage of litigation.
Headnotes†
Specific Relief Act 1963 – s.12 – Specific performance of 
part of contract – Petitioner/plaintiff instituted a suit seeking 
specific performance of agreement and delivery of possession 
of suit property; alternatively, he sought damages – Trial Court 
rejected prayer for specific performance – Directed refund of 
earnest money to plaintiff – In appeal, High Court held plaintiff 
could not claim specific performance under Section 12 – SLP 
dismissed – Plaintiff not ready and willing to perform his part 
of the contract – Cannot invoke Section 12(3) – Power to grant 
partial relief under Section 12(3) discretionary – To be exercised 
keeping in mind facts and circumstances of the case:
Held: Petitioner/plaintiff instituted a suit seeking specific performance 
of the agreement to sell and for delivery of possession of the suit 
property, seeking damages with interest in the alternative – Trial Court 
rejected prayer for specific performance and directed refund of earnest 
money with interest – High Court held plaintiff could not invoke Section 
12(3), Specific Relief Act, to claim specific performance of part of the 
agreement – SLP against impugned High Court order dismissed – It 
is not open to the High Court to direct specific performance of a part 
of contract except otherwise provided in sub-sections (2), (3) and (4) 
of Section 12 – Power of the court to grant partial relief, from the very 
language of Section 12(3) is discretionary, to be exercised keeping 
in view the facts and circumstances of each case and the rights and 
interests of the parties involved – Meaning of ‘unable to perform’ 
[2025] 1 S.C.R. 
719
Vijay Prabhu v. S.T. Lajapathie & Ors.
and ‘considerable part’ in Section 12(3) discussed – Section 12(3) 
can be invoked only where the terms of contract permit segregation 
of rights and interests of parties in the property – In view of the 
specific finding recorded by the courts below that the plaintiff was not 
ready and willing to perform his part of the contract and the plaintiff 
being in default – Plaintiff is not entitled to invoke Section 12(3) – 
Amount deposited in Trial Court as refund of earnest money to be 
refunded to the petitioner/plaintiff with the accumulated interest.  
[Paras 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15]
Claim for grant of benefit under Section 12(3) – Raised for the 
first time before High Court in first appeal – Held, relinquishment 
of claim to further performance of the remaining part of the 
contract and all rights to compensation can be made at any 
stage of litigation:
Held: Claim for grant of benefit under Section 12(3) of the Act 
rightly not rejected by High Court on the simple ground that it 
was not made at the trial stage and had been made for the first 
time at the appellate stage – Relinquishment can be made at any 
stage of the litigation including the appellate stage – Claim cannot 
also be rejected on the short ground that it was not incorporated 
in the plaint or was not set forth in writing before the Trial Court. 
[Paras 18, 19, 20 and 21]
Case Law Cited
Jaswinder Kaur (Now Deceased) through her Legal Representatives 
and Others v. Gurmeet Singh and Others reported [2017] 5 SCR 
430 : (2017) 12 SCC 810; Kalyanpur Lime Works v. State of Bihar 
reported [1954] 1 SCR 958 : AIR 1954 SC 165; Waryam Singh v. 
Gopi Chand, AIR 1930 Lah 34; Ram Niwas v. Smt. Omkari and 
Another, AIR 1983 All 310 – relied on.
List of Acts
Specific Relief Act, 1963.
List of Keywords
Suit for specific performance; Specific performance of part of 
contract; Section 12 of Specific Relief Act; Ready and willing; Partial 
relief; Discretionary power; Relinquishment of claim; Benefit under 
Section 12(3) of the Act; Stage of making claim.
720
[2025] 1 S.C.R.
Supreme Court Reports
Case Arising From
EXTRAORDINARY APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Petition for 
Special Leave To Appeal (C) No. 25246 of 2023
From the Judgment and Order dated 24.03.2023 of the High Court 
of

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.