UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. versus NARENDRA PANDURANG KADAM AND ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
• UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. A v. NARENDRA PANDURANG KADAM AND ORS. DECEMBER 16,1994 [B.P. JEEV AN REDDY AND SUHAS C. SEN, JJ.] B Motor Vehicles Act, 1939: Section I JO-CC. Accident-Compensation claim-Interest on-Held interest cannot be awarded from a date earlier than the date of claim-Held on facts interference with order of interest not called for. C In a road accident the respondent, a young man of good health, a sportsman and a bright student, sustained fracture of the bone in the left leg resulting in permanent shortening of the leg, disability of the right index finger, fracture of ribs, loss of vision of both eyes with D 100% disability. Besides one of his kidneys had also to be removed. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, held that claimant had proved that the accident was due to the rash and negligent driving on the part of the driver of the bus which was insured with the appellant-Insurance Company. Having regard to injuries suffered by the claimant, the Tribunal awarded a compensation of Rs. 1,50,000. On appeal the High E Court enhanced the compensation to Rs. 2,50,000 with interest @ 12% per annum .from the date of accident till actual payment. In appeal to this Court, preferred by the Insurance Company, it was contended that a Court or Tribunal cannot allow interest from a date earlier than the date of making the claim for compensation. F Dismissing the appeal, this Court HELD: 1. Ideally a claim should be settled as soon as it is made. Because of the delay in settlement of the claim by legal process or otherwise interest may be awarded but such interest cannot be from a G date earlier than the date of the claim. The language of Section 110-CC of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, is clear that the interest can be awarded by the Court or Tribunal at such rate as it thinks fit but the interest cannot be made payable from a date earlier than the date of the claim. [690 D] H 687 A B c 688 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1994] SUPP. 6 S.C.R 2. The accident caused by the rash and negligent driving of the bus has ruined the life of the claimant. The amount of compensation given by the High Court does not appear to be on the high side. Considering the enormity of the suffering underwent by the claimant and also the permanent injuries sustained by him as well as loss of future income and enjoyment of life, this Court is disinclined to interfere with the order directing payment of interest, which will have the effect of further reduction in the quantum of compensation awarded by the High Court. [690 E, 691 D] CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 9465 of 1994. From the Judgment and Order dated 17.2.86 of the Bombay High Court in F.C.A.No. 41of1985. S.C. Dhanda and Ms. Sushma Suri for the Appellant. D The Judgment of the Court was delivered by E F G H SEN, J. Leave granted. This case has arisen out of an insurance claim made by Narendra Pandurang Kadam. Narendra was a bright student studying Industrial Electronics. He stood first in his class and fourth in the college. He was physically fit and a sportsman. On 18.5.1980, at about 6 A.M. Narendra was travelling with one Sunil David on motorcycle bearing No.GDC-7526 along Afonso do Albuquerque Road, Panaji, Goa. When the motorcycle carrying the claimant and his companion had reached a road crossing the bus No. GDS-1574 driven by the Alisaheb Appasaheb Nadar, belonging to Ashok Vishwanath Naik came from the western section of Albuquerque road, and collided with the motorcycle. As a result of which Narendre sustained serious injuries. Narendra's case is that the accident was due to rash and negligent driving on the part of the driver of the bus. He was plying the bus at very high speed, and was unable to control the vehicle at the intersection. After the accident the motor cycle was dragged to a considerable distance before the bus could be stopped. As a result of the accident, Narendra sustained fracture of the bone in the left leg resulting in permanent shortening of the leg, disability of the right index finger, fracture of the 6th and 7th ribs, loss of vision of both eyes with 100% disability and one of his kidneys had to be .. • - • UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. N. P. KADAM [SEN, J.] 689 removed. The bus was insured with United India Insurance Company Ltd., A the appellant herein. Narendra lodged a claim for compensation before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Pa
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex