LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

UNION OF LNDIA AND ORS. versus DHARMA PAL AND ORS. ETC.

Citation: [1996] 3 S.C.R. 1056 · Decided: 29-03-1996 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK · Disposal: Disposed off

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
UNION OF lNDIA AND ORS. 
v. 
DHARMA PAL AND ORS. ETC. 
MARCH 29, 1996 
B 
[K. RAMASWAMY AND G.B. PATTANAIK, JJ.j 
Labour Law: 
lndust1ial Di.1putes Act, 1947/Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 : 
C 
Casual Labow·e1"/Daily wage worken-Regulmisation of-U11io11 Ter-
1ito1y of C/wndigarh-Work chmge employees/Ca.ma/ labourers/Daily wage 
workers working in the Govenunent. Departn1ents for nzore than JO 
year.'i'"-Schenze ji·anzed by tlze Govenunent for regula1isation approved and 
directed to be ilnple111ented-E111ployees who are regula1ised would be entitled 
D lo all (he regular payment at the scale of pay presc1ibed lo the Central 
Govenunent e111ploye~Worke1:\' who are not regula1ised are entitled to niin-
imwn sa/aiy presc1ibed for the post-In addition to that they are also entitled 
to 60% of the DA. at Punjab pattem-Procedure for retre11chment to be 
followed in J"Cj]Ject of the worke1:f who are required to be retrenched. 
E 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 7062 of 
1996 Etc. 
From the Judgment and Order dated 1.4.92 of the Central Ad-
ministrative Tribunal, Chandigarh in 0.A. No. 276 CH. of 1989. 
F 
K. Madhava Reddy, P.S. Poti and M.R. Sharma, Kanwaljcet Koch-
har, J.D. Jain, K. R. Nambiar, C.M Sharma, M.C. Dhingra and Anjani 
Sharma for the appearing parties. 
·+ 
The following Order of the Court was delivered : 
G 
Leave granted. 
We have heard learned counsel on both sides. 
Pursuant to the direction given by this Court the appellants have 
-I -· 
framed the scheme. Shri K.B. Sharma, Superintending Engineer, Construc-
H tion Circle No. 2, Chandigarh Administration has placed the same along 
1056 
U.0.1.v. DHARMAPAL 
1057 
with the additional affidavit. The Scheme has been approved by the Central A 
Government. The .schc1ne reads as under : 
For work charged eniployees : 
"(i) All the works establishment (excluding office of Ministerial 
Clerical and drawing cadres below the level of _junior Engineer), 
engaged in the construction/execution of maintenance work, shall 
be called 'Work Force'. The work force includes buildings, roads, 
public health activities comprising augmentation of water supply, 
canals, drainage, electrical and electricity etc. The 'work division' 
shall he a unit for casual or daily wage work force and a 'circle' 
for work charged establishment. Separate cadre and seniority list 
for each category shall be maintained in the Division and Circle 
as the case may be. 
B 
c 
(ii) Workers engaged on jobs, which are likely to be of a short 
duration, i.e., less than 240 days in a year, will be terminated on D 
completion of work. No seniority list of such workers will be 
required to be maintained. 
(iii) Workers who have completed five. years service as on 31st 
August, 1995 will be considered for Regularisation against the 
available regular posts subject to the fulfilment of requirements as E 
laid down in the Recruitment Rules for the post in question, if 
they were recruited before 6.1.1992, the date on which a ban was 
imposed on the recruitment of daily/casual workers. 
(iv) Since a complete ban on recruitment of· work charged 
casual/daily wage employees was imposed by Chandigarh Ad-
ministration, those recruited in contravention o.f this policy 
decision after this date, i.e., 6.1.1992 will be considered for their . 
regularisation only on the assessment of justification/requirements 
on the basis of norms approved for the continued nature of work 
and attaching the specific approval of Home Department, Chan-
digarh Administration. 
For Casual/Daily Wage1~ 
(v) Workers working as Casual labourers in works which have more 
F 
G 
or less fixed period of completion will be eligible for payment of H 
1058 
A 
B 
c 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[1996] 3 S.C.R. 
benefits as admissible to them under rules. However, they will not 
be considered for regularisation automatically. Their requirement 
has to be reassessed after commissioning the work. Thus, the 
workers will be liable lo be retrenched on completion of works 
except categories in limited numbers who are required for the 
operation and maintenance of the completed works. In their cases 
specific approval of the Home Department should be taken. 
(vi) Daily wage employees who have completed 10 years or more 
service as on 31.8.1995 shall be considered for regularisation w.e.f. 
31.8.1995 on the availability of posts. Such employees shall be 
entitled for minimum of the scale w.e.f. the date of their regularisa-
tion. On regularisa

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.