LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

UNION OF INDIA versus RAFIQUE SHAIKH BHIKAN & ORS.

Citation: [2013] 5 S.C.R. 428 · Decided: 16-04-2013 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: AFTAB ALAM · Disposal: Disposed off

Cited by 3 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
B 
[2013] 5 S.C.R. 428 
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 
v. 
RAFIQUE SHAIKH BHIKAN & ORS. 
Petition for Special Leave to 
APPEAL (CIVIL) N0.28609/2011 
APRIL 16, 2013 
[AFTAB ALAM AND RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, JJ.) 
Hajj policy - Policy for Haj Committee of India Pilgrims 
C - Held: Practice of framing Hajj Policy on annual basis is ad-
hoc and unsatisfactory - Requirement of a policy framework 
for five years - Proposed Hajj Policy 2013 - 2017 be posted 
on the website of the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) inviting 
objections, comments and suggestions -
Final policy to 
D remain valid and operative for five years upto Hajj 2017 and 
may be amended only in case of any change in 
arrangements with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia as per the 
agreement entered into between the two countries every year. 
E 
Hajj policy - Lady pilgrims - Held: Hajj Policy to pay 
attention to special needs of the lady pilgrims. 
Hajj policy - Time bound conduct of Hajj process - Held: 
Time schedule with regard to the hajj process as fixed by the 
Haj Committee of India to be strictly adhered to - No authority 
F or court to interfere in the process of submission of 
applications, scrutiny and allotment of seats by the Haj 
Committees, in case the interference would lead to disturbing 
the time schedule. 
G 
Hajj policy -
Accommodation in Saudi Arabia -
Committee constituted by Supreme Court to make 
arrangements for the pilgrims' accommodation in Saudi 
Arabia on a long term basis - Committee expected to make 
arrangements for stay of Indian pilgrims in Saudi Arabia by 
H 
428 
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. v. RAFIQUE SHAIKH 
429 
BHIKAN & ORS. 
taking accommodations on lease for a term not less than five 
A 
years before the commencement of Hajj 2013. 
Hajj policy - Air Fare - Government of India to invite 
tenders from the three Saudi Airlines and all the Indian 
registered Airlines besides any other airlines that may be 
8 
eligible under the Saudi Policy. 
Hajj policy - Grievance redressal - Held: At present a 
Joint Secretary in the Ministry of External Affairs is in-charge 
of Gulf and Hajj - But both the Gulf and the Hajj involve huge 
responsibilities - Government of India to give responsibility C 
of the Hajj alone to an Officer of the level of the Joint 
Secretary - Hajj cell to also have a permanent and effective 
grievance redressal mechanism - An officer of the level of 
Deputy Secretary to be made in-charge of dealing with all 
grievances concerning Hajj received from any of the Haji 
D 
Committees or any individual or group of individuals -
Central Government advised to constitute a high powered 
committee to review the functioning of the Haj Committee of 
India, the State Haj Committees and the Union Territory Haj 
Committees and to consider theΒ· suggestions or grievances 
E 
made by those Committees with a view to improving their 
performance. 
Hajj policy - Policy for Private Tour Operators (PTOs) -
Held: Classification of PTOs to categories 1 & 2 fair and 
F 
reasonable and strikes a proper balance between needs of 
the pilgrims and also making provision for new entrants on a 
calibrated basis - Policy, approved after modifications by 
Supreme Court - Approved policy to be called Policy for 
Private Tour Operators for Hajj 2013-2017 - It shall remain 
valid for five years and shall not be questioned before any 
G 
court or authority. 
The instant special leave petition was filed by the 
Union of India against' the judgment passed by the 
Bombay High Court by which the Government was 
H 
430 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2013] 5 S.C.R. 
A directed to release 800 seats from the Government quota 
in favour of the writ petitioners [a group of Private Tour 
Operators (PTOs)] under the Government's PTO Policy 
for Hajj 2011. 
8 
Though the special leave petition was on a very 
limited issue, the Supreme Court decided to treat the case 
as a public interest litigation and to examine some of the 
major issues concerning the Hajj Policy of the 
Government of India. In the past two years, the Supreme 
C Court passed orders on a number of issues concerning 
the Government Hajj Policy. 
While re-iterating and confirming its earlier orders/ 
directions, some other important issues in the Hajj Policy 
of the Government of India, viz. i) Policy for Haj 
D Committee of India Pilgrims; ii) time bound conduct of hajj 
process; iii) accommodation in Saudi Arabia; iv) Air Fare; 
v) Grievance redressal and vi) Policy for Private Tour 
Operators were now dealt w

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.