LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

UNION OF INDIA versus HARPAT SINGH & ORS.

Citation: [2009] 9 S.C.R. 705 · Decided: 12-05-2009 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: S.B. SINHA · Disposal: Disposed off

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

(2009] 9 S.C.R. 705 
UNION OF INDIA 
,V. 
HARPAT SINGH & ORS. 
(Civil Appeal No. 2367 of 2006) 
MAY 12, 2009 
[S.8. SINHA AND CYRIAC JOSEPH, JJ.] 
Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 
A 
B 
ss. 4 and 23 - Acquisition of agricultural land for C 
development of Delhi -
Notifications uls 4 issued on 
9.4.1979, 17.11.1980 and 21.7.1987 - HELD: Compensation 
having been determined by Supreme Court in respect of 
lands acquired under Notifications dated 17. 11. 1980 in 
respect of three of the villages at Rs. 76. 55 per sq. yard, ยท D 
\ 
compensation for lands of village in question acquired under 
Notification dated 17.11.1980 is also determined at Rs. 76.55 
per sq. yard - For lands acquired under Notification dated 
9.4.1979, 10% to be deducted from the said amount and that 
for lands acquired under Notification dated 21. 7. 1987 
E 
compensation to be increased by 10% per year.1 
A large tract of agricultural lands situate in villages 
Chilla Saroda, Gharoli, Kondly and Dallupura was 
acquired for development of Delhi, as per Notifications ul 
s 4 of the Land Acquistion Act, 1894 issued on 17.11.1980. 
F 
In respect of a few cases Notifications uls 4 were issued 
.on 9.4.1979 and 21.7.1987. The Land Acquisition 
Collector awarded compensation at the rates of Rs. 8000/ 
- per bigha to Rs. 90001- per bigha. The reference court 
enhanced the compensation to Rs. 23,0001- per bigha for G 
the lands of Gharoli village and Rs. 76,550/- per bigha for 
the lands of Kondli and Dallupure villages. It, however, 
maintained the compensation of Rs. 8000/- per bigha for 
705 
H 
706 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2009] 9 S.C.R. 
A the lands of village Chilla Saroda Bangar. The High Court 
further enhanced the comp.ensation to Rs. 76,550/- per 
bigha for the lands of Gharoli village and Rs.3,45,000/- for 
the lands of Kondli, Dallupura and Chilla Saroda villages. 
The Supreme Court by its judgment in Karam Singh's 
s case1 maintained the compensation ,of Rs. 76,550/- per 
bigha as awarded by the High Court for village Gharoli 
but reduced the compensation from Rs. 3,45,000/- per 
bigha as awarded by the High Corut for landsin villages 
Kondli and Dallupura to Rs. 76,550/- per bigha by its 
c judgment in Bali Ram Sharma's case2โ€ข The instant appeals 
filed by the Union of India are against the judgment of the 
High Court awarding compensation at the rate of Rs. 
3,45,000/- per bigha for the lands of Village Chilla Saroda 
Bangar. 
D 
Disposing the appeals, the Court 
HELD: 1.1. By reason of the notification a large 
number of persons were affected. Most of them, 
however, were satisfied with the amount of compensation 
E received by them. Only 103 persons filed claim petition 
pursuant to the notices issued to them u/ss 9 and 10 of 
the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Only five of the said 103 
claimants, had filed deeds of sale. The rate at which lands 
were sold in terms of the deeds of sale relied upon by 
F some of the claimants in support of their claims ranged 
from Rs.3376/- to Rs.9970/- per bigha. The transactions 
in respect of all those lands indisputably were entered 
into after the notification. However, keeping in view the 
facts and circumstances of the case and the materials 
G brought on record, the Land Acquisition Collector opined 
that amount of compensation for the lands in the village 
H 
1. 
Karan Singh & Ors. Union of India (1997) 8 SCC 186. 
2. 
Delhi Development Authority v. Bali Ram Shanna & Ors. [(2004) 6 SCC 
533. 
/. 
+ 
UNION OF INDIA v. HARPAT SINGH & ORS. 
707 
4 
in question should be determined at the rate of Rs. 8,0001 
A 
- per bigha apart from the other amount payable to the 
claimants under the statute. The referenc court did not 
interfere with the said award. It was only the High Court 
which relying upon Ratan Lal's case interfered therewith 
and determined the fair market value at Rs. 345 per square 
B 
yard. Contention that Ratan Lal has attained finality and 
no appeal was preferred thereagainst does not appear to 
t. 
be correct. Ratan Lal also came up for consideration 
before this Court and disposed of along with Bali Ram 
Sharma. [Para 20 and 21] [720-G-H; 721-A-D, F-G] 
c 
1.2. In view of Karan Singh and Bali Ram Sharma, the 
minimum amount of compensation which must be paid 
should be determined at Rs. 76.55 per square yard. The 
High Court proceeded to determine the amount of 0 
compensation not on the basis of the development work 
carried out in Delhi but in NOIDA as those three villages 
are closer to

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.