LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus M/S. TATA TEA CO. LTD. & ANR.

Citation: [2017] 12 S.C.R. 655 · Decided: 20-09-2017 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: A.K. SIKRI · Disposal: Disposed off

cites 2 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2017] 12 S.C.R. 655 
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 
v. 
' 
M/S. TATA TEA CO. LTD. & ANR. 
(Civil Appeal No. 9178 of2012) 
SEPTEMBER20, 2017 
[A. K. SIKRI AND ASHOK BHUSHAN, JJ.] 
A 
B 
c 
Income Tax Act, 1961 - s.115-0 (as inserted by Finance Act, 
1997) - Constitutional validity of - Challenge to, by tea companies 
carrying on the business of cultivating tea leaves in their tea gardens 
and processing it in their factory for marketing the same - Section 
115-0 imposes additional tax on the dividend distributed by a 
Company - Plea of tea companies that income out of which dividend 
was distributed by them was agricultural income to the extent of 
60%, tax on which could only be imposed by State Legislature (under 
List II, Entry 46) and the Parliament transgressed its legislative D 
power in enacting s.115-0 as Parliament has no legislative 
competence to tax agricultural Β·income - Held: When dividend is 
declared to be distributed and paid to company s shareholder it is 
not impressed with character of source of its income, i.e. which on 
facts is agricultural income - F11rthe1; entries in the VIJ1h Schedule 
are not powers but fields of legislature - Words in the respective 
entries have to be given the widest scope of their meaning - Each 
general word should extend to ancillary or subsidiary matter which 
can be comprehended in it - As per Entry 82 of List I Union/ 
. Parliament has full power to legislate in the field of "taxes on 
income", excluding only tax on agricultural income - Income as 
defined in s.2(24) of the 1961 Act is an inclusive definition 
specifically including "dividend" - S.115-0 pertains to declaration, 
distribution or payment of dividend by domestic company - Thus, 
imposition of additional tax on dividend is covered under Entry 82, 
E 
F 
List I - The pith and substance of s.115-0 is clearly covered by 0 
Entry 82, List I - Further, the provisions of s.115-0 cannot be said 
to be directly included in the .fteld of tax on agricultural income -
Thus, any entrenchment, if at all, by the provisions of s.115-0 on 
the field covered by Entry 46, List II is only incidental and the 
legislation cannot be annulled on the ground of such incidental 
655 
H 
656 
A 
B 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2017) 12 S.C.R. 
trenching in the field of State Legislature - S.115-0 held to be within 
the legislative competence of Parliament - Constitution of India -
Chapter I, Part XI, Art.246 -
VJJlh Schedule- List I, Entry 82 and 
List II, Entry 46 - Finance Act, 1997 - Chapter XllD - Income tax 
Act, 1922 - Government of India Act, 1935 - Interpretation of 
Statutes - Principle of pith and substance. 
Interpretation of Statutes - Constitution of India - VII'" 
Schedule- List I, Entry 82 and List II, Entry 46 - Overlapping in the 
entries - Duty of Courts - Held: In the event of any overlapping is . 
found in two Entries of the Lists in the Seventh Schedule or two 
C 
legislations. it is the duty of the Court to find out its true intent and 
pwpose and to examine the particular legislation in its pith and 
substance - Doctrines/Principles - Doctrine of pith and substance. 
D 
E 
Words & Phrases - "Dividend" - Nature of - Discussed -
Income Tax Act, 1961. 
Income Tax Rules, 1962 - r.8 -Income from the manufacture 
of tea - Tea companies carrying on the business of cultivating tea 
leaves in their tea gardens and processing it in their factory for 
marketing the same - 40% of tea companies' income is taxable as 
income derived from business - Writ petitions by tea companies 
before Calcutta High Court challenging the vires of s.115-0 of the 
1961 Act - Writ petition dismissed by Single Judge of High Court -
In appeal, Division Bench though upheld the constitutionality of 
s.115-0 but held that such additional tax as levied by s.115-0 on 
the profit distributed as dividend, will be payable only on 40% income 
which is the taxable income of the tea companies - Propriety of 
F 
Held: Provisions of s.115-0 are well within the competence of 
Parliament - To put any limitation in the said provision shall be 
altering the provision of s. 115-0 which is not warranted - Income 
Tax Act, 1961 - s.115-0. 
Disposing of the appeals, the Court 
G 
HELD: 1. The Finance Act, 1997 inserted a new Chapter 
H 
XIlD in the Income Tax Act 1961 with heading "special provisions 
relating to tax on distributed profits on domestic companies". 
Section 115-0, sub-sections (1), (2) and (3) in the 1961 Act was 
inserted by Finance Act, 1997. [Para 10][66

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.