LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. versus M/S. SH. RAM RAYONS

Citation: [1996] 2 S.C.R. 457 · Decided: 12-02-1996 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. 
A 
v . . 
MIS. SH. RAM RAYONS 
FEBRUARY 12, 1996 
[K. RAMASWAMY AND G.B. PATTANAIK, JJ.] 
B 
Imp01ts (Control) Order, 1955: 
Clause 4(2)-Fees on application of licence-Application made for 
grant of supplementmy licence for imp01t of certain items-Deposit of C 
fees-Due to change of policy licence could not be issued-Writ Petition filed 
for direction to refund the amount-High Court directing refund-Held: A 
reading of the clause clearly shows that no fee is refundable under any 
circumstances except under ce1tain conditions-In the instant case High Court 
was not justified in directing refund of the amount. 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 3635 of 
1996. 
From the Judgment and Order dated 3.3.94 of the Delhi High Court 
in C.W.P. No. 4128 of 1993. 
D.P. Gupta, Solicitor General, A. Subba Rao and Ms. Sushma Suri 
for the Appellants. 
P.N. Puri and Atul Nanda for the Respondents. 
The following Order of the Court was delivered : 
Leave granted. 
We have heard the counsel on both sides. 
D 
E 
F 
This appeal by special leave arises from the order made on March 
3, 1994 by the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi in W.P. No. G 
4128/93. Admittedly, the respondent made an application for grant of the 
supplementary licence for import of certain items and deposited a sum of 
Rs. 1 lakh. The Licensing Authority had recommended the name of the 
appellant but in the meantime policy had been changed on July 4, 1991. 
Consequently, the licence could not be issued. The respondent filed the H 
457 
458 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[1996] 2 S.C.R. 
A 
writ petition on August 28, 1993 for a direction to refund the amount. The 
High Court in the impugned order accordingly directed the refund with 
interest at 12% from March 4, 1992. Thus, this appeal by special leave. 
B 
c 
D 
E 
F 
G 
Clause 4(2) of Imports (Control) Order 1955 reads as under : 
"4. Fees on Application of Licence : (1) Every application for a 
licence shall be made to the appropriate licensing authority. 
(2) A fee as indicated in Schedule III shall be paid in respect of 
every application in the manner provided in the said Schedule: 
Provided that no fee shall be payable in respect of any application 
when made by -
(a) the Central Government, A State Government or any 
department or office of the Central Government or State 
Government; 
(b) any local authority for the import of goods required for 
its own consumption; 
( c) any educational, charitable or missionary institution for 
the import of goods required for its own consumption; 
The fees once received will not be refunded under any circumstan-
ces except: 
(i) where the fee has been deposited m excess of the 
prescribed scale; 
(ii) where the fee has been deposited but no application has 
been made. 
(iii) where the fee has been deposited in error but the ap-
plicant is exempt from payment of licence fee. 
Note : Fees paid in respect of Appeals made to the Chief Con- . 
troller of imports and Exports and its Regional Licensing 
Authorities shall not be refunded under any circumstances." 
H 
A reading thereof clearly indicates that no fee shall be refundable 
• • 
U.0.1. v. SHRI RAM RAYONS 
459 
under any circumstance has been except where the fee has been deposited A 
in excess of the prescribed scale; where the fee has been deposited but no 
application has been made, in other words, though deposit of the amount 
was made but no application has been submitted for consideration; or 
where the fees has been deposited in error but the applicant is exempt from 
payment of the licence fee. Under these circumstances, the High Court was 
not justified in directing refund of the amount. 
The appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs. 
G.N. 
Appeal allowed. 
B