ULTRA TECH CEMENT LTD. versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
(2011) 11 S.C.R. 613 ULTRA TECH CEMENT LTD. A (EARLIER ULTRATECH CEMCO LTD.) V. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. (Civil Appeal No. 864 of. 2005) SEPTEMBER 27, 20ยท11 B [R.V. RAVEENDRAN, A. K. PATNAIK AND SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, JJ.] MINERAL CONCESSION RULES, 1961: c r. 27 (1) (d) - Mining lease ...; Lessee from the State Government - Demand for Zilla Parishad Gess (ZP cess) and Gram Panchayat Gess (GP cess) - Held: Where a particular cess is /eviab/e under an enactment, and the contract says that the lessee is liable to pay such cess leviab/e under that D enactment, but the enactment exempted a specified class of persons (to which the lessee belongs) from paying the said cess, the State Government cannot make the lessee liable to pay the said cess on the ground that under the contract entered under a different eneactment, the lessee is liable to E pay such cess - In the instant case, since the assessee being a lessee from the Government is by virtue of s. 151 of Zita Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 is exempt from paying GP cess under the Act, cess cannot be levied in terms of a contract- Similarly, as the lessee is, under clause V/1(1) F of the /ease deed, exempt from land revenue, it is not liable to pay GP cess - Thus, the lessee is not liable to pay ZP cess or GP cess to the State Government under the lease deed - However, it is made clear that if ZP cess and GP cess become payable by the assessee by virtue of any amendment to the G provisions of the respective enactments under which such cesses are leviable, then the lessee may have to pay the same - Maharashtra Zita Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 - s. 151(1) - Bombay Gram Panchayats Act, 1958 613 H 614 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2011] 11 S.C.R. A - s. 127 (1) - Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - s. 64. WORDS AND PHRASES: Expression 'assessable' and 'cess assessable on land' 8 - Explained. The appellant, under the lease deed dated 12.2.1980, was granted a lease by the State Government for mining limestone. It approached the High Court challenging the demand for payment of Zila Parishad Cess (ZP cess) and c Gram Panchayat. Cess (GP cess) on the ground that s. 151 (1) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 exempted the lessees from the State Government from payment of ZP cess and as per s. 64 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, read with 0 Clause Vll(1) of the lease deed, it was not liable to pay the GP cess also. The High Court declined to interfere. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 Where a particular cess is leviable under an enactment, and the contract says that the lessee is E liable to pay such cess leviable under that enactment, but the enactment exempted a specified.class of persons (to which the lessee belongs) from paying the said cess, the State Government cannot make the lessee liable to pay the said cess on the ground that under the contract F entered under a different enactment, the lessee is liable to pay such cess. [para 7] [621-EยทF] 1.2 It Is evident from the provision of s.151 (1) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads Act that a 'lessee from the state government' is not liable to pay ZP cess under the G said provision. The ZP cess can be levied only in terms of and under the Zilla Parishads Act and cannot be levied by the State Government, under the "terms of a contract. [para 7) [621-D] H 1.3 It is significant to note that the State Government ULIKA lt:t;H t;t:MENT LTD. (EARLIER ULTRATECH CEMCO 615 LTD.) v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA has stipulated in the lease that the mining lessee shall A pay ZP cess assessable on the land. It has not used the words 'an amount equivalent to ZP cess that could be or may be assessed on the land.' The word 'assessable' means liable to be assessed. The effect of clause V(4) of the lease deed providing that the mining lessee shall pay B 'ZP cess assessable on the land' is this: if it is liable to be paid under the Zilla Parishads Act, that should be paid by the lessee and payment thereof is a term of the lease; and if the lessee is not liable to pay ZP cess in view of the exemption under the ZP Act, it is not payable. [para 6 c and 8) [620-E; 622-C) 1.4 There is yet another indication that what is required to be paid is ZP cess, only if it is leviable under Zilla Parishads Act. Clause V(4) provides that the mining lessee shall pay "cesses assessable on the land (ZP and
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex