LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

U.P. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION versus SATYA NARAYAN SHEOHARE & ORS

Citation: [2009] 4 S.C.R. 491 · Decided: 26-02-2009 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: R.V. RAVEENDRAN · Disposal: Disposed off

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2009] 4 S.C.R. 491 
U.P. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION 
A 
v. 
SATYA NARAYAN SHEOHARE & ORS. 
Civil Appeal No. 2627 of 2006 
FEBRUARY 26, 2009 
B 
[R.V. RAVEENDRAN AND H.L. DATTU, JJ.] 
~ 
U. P Public Services (Reservation for Schedule Castes, 
Scheduled Tribes and other Backward Classes) Act, 1994 -
Section 15 - Entitlement to claim benefit of reservation -
Recruitment to post of Civil Judge (Jr. Division) - On basis of c 
written test and interview - Respondents filed application as 
general category candidates -Before the written test 
commenced, State government issued notification amending 
the First Schedule to the Act and thus including the castes to 
which Respondents belonged, in the list of OBCs -
D 
Respondents obtained caste certificates and claimed benefit 
of reservation as candidates belonging to Other Backward 
Classes - Representations not accepted - Writ petitions -
High Court allowed the petitions and directed the Respondents 
to be treated as OBC candidates - Justification of - Held: 
E 
Justified - Status of Respondents as on the date when the 
selection process is deemed to have been initiated, is relevant 
to decide whether they were entitled to claim the benefit of 
reservation - Process of selection is deemed to have been 
initiated when the written test was started -
Though F 
Respondents were general category candidates when the 
recruitment notification was issued, as on the relevant date, 
namely the date on which the selection process was deemed 
to have been initiated, they were OBC candidates and became 
entitled to claim the benefit of reservation. 
G 
~ 
The appellant-Commission issued advertisement 
inviting applications for filling posts of Civil Judge (Junior 
Division) under the U.P. Nyayik Niyamavali 1951. The 
491 
H 
492 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2009} 4 S. C.R. 
A respondents filed application as general category 
candidates. Meanwhile, the State Government added the 
castes of 'kalar' and 'kalal' in the list of Other Backward 
Classes by amending the First Schedule to the U.P. Public 
Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled 
B Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994. 
The respondents who belonged to the 'kalar'/kalal 
caste obtained caste certificates and made represen-
tations to the Appellant Commission to extend them the 
benefit of reservation as candidates belonging to Other 
C Backward Classes. The representations were not 
accepted and the Respondents were considered as 
general category candidates. The respondents were not 
selected. Feeling aggrieved, they filed writ petitions before 
the High Court contending that they ought to have been 
0 treated as OBC candidates. The High Court allowed the 
petitions and directed the respondents to be treated as 
OBC candidates. 
Disposing of the appeals, the Court 
HELD: 1. Section 15 of the U.P. Public Services 
E (Reservation for Schedule Castes, Scheduled Tribes and 
other Backward Classes) Act, 1994 makes it clear that if 
selection process had been initiated before the 
commencement of the Act, that is before 1.12.1993, such 
selection process had to be dealt with in accordance with 
F the provisions of law and government orders as they 
stood before such commencement date and not by the 
provisions of the Act. For this purpose, according to the 
explanation to the section, the selection process shall be 
deemed to have been initiated when the written test started 
G (where the recruitment was on the basis of written test 
and interview). On account of this special deeming 
provision, reservzition provision in the Act became 
applicable even in regard to recruitment notifications 
issued prior to the commencement of the Act, provided 
H the written test had not commenced as on the date of 
1 
• 
U.P. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION V. 
493 
SATYA NARAYAN SHEOHARE & ORS. 
commencement of the Act. Section 2(b) of the Act defines A 
'other backward classes of citizens' as those backward 
classes of citizens specified in Schedule I to the Act. 
Where a particular caste was not included in the list of 
'other backward classes' in Schedule I to the Act, when 
the Act was enacted, and when such caste is B 
subsequently added to the list of other backward classes 
in Schedule I of the Act by way of an amendment, for all 
purposes, the Act commences in respect of the newly 
added caste, from the date when the Amendment Act 
came into effect. Thus, the principle contained in Section c 
15 would apply whenever a new caste, 

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.