LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ETC. versus SHAMBHU NATH SINGLA AND ORS.

Citation: [1995] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 582 · Decided: 22-11-1995 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA · Disposal: Disposed off

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ETC. 
v. 
SHAMBHU NATH SINGLA AND ORS. 
NOVEMBER 22, 1995 
B 
[K. RAMASWAMY AND B.L. HANSARIA, JJ.] 
Service Law: 
Discharge from service-Criminal case pending-Reinstatement of 
C employee on discharge by criminal court-Period of suspension-Salary and 
other allowances-Entitlement to-Directions issued. 
D 
The State of Punjab has preferred the present appeals against the 
High Court's judgment directing reinstatement of the first respondent 
pending criminal prosecution. 
Disposing of the appeal, this Court 
HELD : Admittedly the first respondent had been discharged by the 
Criminal Court for want of proper sanction, and he was reinstated in the 
service in January, 1988. Consequently, he is e.ntitled to full salary and 
E allowances for the period during which he was kept under suspension. 
(583-A] 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: _Civil Appeal No. 11459 of 
1995 Etc. 
From the Judgment and Ord~r dated 8.8.91 of the Punjab & Haryana 
p. High Court in C.M. No. 429 (LPA). of 1991. 
G.K. Bansal and Sanjay Bans~l for the Appellants. 
K.K. Mohan, Pradeep Gupta and Ratan Lal for the Respondents. 
G 
The following Order of the Court was delivered : 
Leave granted. 
These appeals by special leave arise from the order dated August 8, 
1991 of the Division Bench of the Punjabยท_& Haryana High Court directing 
H the reinstatement of the first respondent pending the criminal prosecution. 
582 , 
-\ 
STATE v. S.N. SINGLA 
583 
Since it is now admitted across the Bar that the first respondent had been A 
discharged by the Criminal Court for want of proper sanction, he was 
reinstated in the service in January, 1988. Consequently, he is entitled to 
full salary and allowances for the period during which he was kept under 
suspension. 
The appeals are accordingly disposed of. No costs. 
G.N. 
Appeal disposed of. 
B