LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA versus LALRINTLUANGA SAILO & ANR.

Citation: [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1314 · Decided: 16-07-2024 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: C.T. RAVIKUMAR, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA · Disposal: Disposed off

cites 2 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2024] 7 S.C.R. 1314 : 2024 INSC 537
The State of Meghalaya  
v.  
Lalrintluanga Sailo & Anr.
(Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 16021 of 2023)
16 July 2024
[C.T. Ravikumar and Prashant Kumar Mishra, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Whether the High Court erred in granting bail to the accused solely 
on the ground that she was suffering from HIV, without adverting 
to the mandate under Section 37(1)(b)(ii), NDPS Act, and without 
taking in view the quantity of the contraband substance.
Headnotes†
Bail – Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,  
1985 – s.37 – Recording a finding mandated u/s.37 is sine qua 
non for granting bail to accused under the Act – High Court 
erred in granting bail to accused solely on the ground that 
she was suffering from HIV, without adverting to the mandate 
u/s.37(1)(b)(ii), when accused was involved in offences under 
the Act on more than one occasion and quantity of contraband 
was much above the commercial quantity.
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – 
s.37 – Grant of bail to accused involved in offence under the 
Act – Twin conditions u/s.37(1)(b)(ii):
Held: While considering the application for bail made by an accused 
involved in an offence under NDPS Act, a liberal approach ignoring 
the mandate under Section 37 of the NDPS Act is impermissible – 
Recording a finding mandated under Section 37 of the NDPS Act 
is sine qua non for granting bail to an accused under the NDPS 
Act – When the accused is involved in offences u/ss. 21(c)/29 
of NDPS Act, on more than one occasion and when the quantity 
of the contraband substance viz., heroin is 1.040 Kgs, much 
above the commercial quantity, then the non-consideration of 
the provisions under Section 37, NDPS Act, has to be taken as 
a very serious lapse – Twin conditions under s.37 of NDPS Act, 
were not satisfied and on the sole reason that the accused was a 
HIV patient, she is not entitled to be released on bail – However, 
accused being HIV positive, is entitled to benefit u/s.34(2) of the 
[2024] 7 S.C.R. 
1315
The State of Meghalaya v. Lalrintluanga Sailo & Anr.
Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Acquired Immune Deficiency 
Syndrome (Prevention and Control) Act, 2017 – In view thereof 
the trial Court to take appropriate steps to expedite the trial on 
priority basis. [Paras 8,10,12,13]
Case Law Cited
Collector of Customs, New Delhi v. Ahmadalieva Nodira [2004] 2 
SCR 1092 : (2004) 3 SCC 549; State of Kerala and Ors. v. Rajesh 
and Ors. [2020] 3 SCR 348 : (2020) 12 SCC 122 – relied on. 
Bhawani Singh v. State of Rajasthan, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 
1991 – distinguished.
List of Acts
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Human 
Immunodeficiency Virus and Acquired Immune Deficiency 
Syndrome (Prevention and Control) Act, 2017; Code of Criminal 
Procedure, 1973.
List of Keywords
Bail; NDPS Act; Twin conditions; Contraband substance; Heroin; 
Commercial quantity; Accused suffering from HIV; Bail granted on 
solitary ground of HIV positive; Non-consideration of provisions 
under Section 37 NDPS Act.
Case Arising From
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Special Leave To Appeal 
(Crl.) No. 16021 of 2023
From the Judgment and Order dated 29.09.2023 of the High Court 
of Meghalaya at Shillong in BA No. 38 of 2023
Appearances for Parties
Amit Kumar, Sr. Adv., Avijit Mani Tripathi, Ms. Rekha Bakshi, 
T.K. Nayak, Ms. Marbiang Khongwir, Advs. for the Petitioner.
Judgment / Order of the Supreme Court
Order
1.	
The State of Meghalaya filed the captioned Special Leave Petition 
challenging the order dated 29.09.2023 passed in Bail Application 
No. 38/2023 by the High Court of Meghalaya at Shillong.
1316
[2024] 7 S.C.R.
Digital Supreme Court Reports
2.	
FIR No.06(02)23 was registered against the respondent-accused 
(Smt. X) on 08.02.2023 for offences under Sections 21(c)/29 of 
the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for 
short ‘NDPS Act’). Anonymization as relates the identity of the 
respondent-accused as ‘Smt.X’ has been done, as she is Human 
Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) positive. Virtually, from 16.03.2023 
onwards, Smt. X was in judicial custody in connection with the crime 
bearing FIR No.22(03)2023 registered at Khliehriat Police Station 
under Sections 21(c)/29 of the NDPS Act and her formal arrest in the 
subject Crime was recorded on 11.04.2023 during such custody. While 
so, as per the order dated 27.06.2023, the High Court of Meghalaya 
at Shillong granted bail in connection with FIR No

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.