LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR. versus TAGHAR VASUDEVA AMBRISH & ANR.

Citation: [2025] 12 S.C.R. 366 · Decided: 04-12-2025 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: J.B. PARDIWALA · Disposal: Dismissed

cites 5 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2025] 12 S.C.R. 366 : 2025 INSC 1380
The State of Karnataka & Anr. 
v. 
Taghar Vasudeva Ambrish & Anr.
(Civil Appeal No. 7846 of 2023)
04 December 2025
[J.B. Pardiwala* and K.V. Viswanathan, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Issue arose whether services provided by the respondent no.1 in 
the form of leasing of residential premises as hostel to students 
and working professionals falls within the ambit of Entry 13 of the 
Notification No. 9/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, 
thus, the respondent no.1 entitled to the exemption on services, 
renting of residential dwelling for use as a residence under Entry 13 
of the Notification.
Headnotes†
Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 – Entry 13 of the 
Notification No. 9/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 – 
GST exemption on renting of residential dwelling for use 
as a residence under Entry 13 – Entitlement – Respondent 
No.1 co-owner of a residential property consisting of 42 
rooms along with other co-owners executed lease deed in 
favour of one-lessee who in turn leased out the residential 
property as hostel to provide long term accommodation to 
students and working professionals – Respondent No.1 filed 
Advance Ruling application as regards to his eligibility to 
claim exemption on the rent received by him from the lessee 
by letting the property – Authority for Advance Ruling held 
that the services provided by the respondent no.1 in the form 
of leasing of residential premises as hostel to students and 
working professionals do not fall within the ambit of Entry 13 
of the Notification, thus, the respondent No.1 not entitled to 
the exemption on renting of residential dwelling for use as 
residence under Entry 13 – Upheld by the Appellate Authority, 
however, set aside by the High Court – Interference:
* Author
[2025] 12 S.C.R. 
367
The State of Karnataka & Anr. v. Taghar Vasudeva Ambrish & Anr.
Held: Not called for – As per the Khatha Extract and layout plans 
and records available, the plot and property is shown as residential 
in nature, thus, the subject property a “residential dwelling – 
Entry 13 grants exemption from GST for renting of residential 
dwellings for use as residence – Property was taken on rent only 
for use as a residence – On a strict construction thereof, all the 
three requirements satisfied – Once the exemption notification is 
applicable, it should be construed liberally – Thus, if the conditions 
are satisfied, the benefit should be available to both lessees and 
the sub-lessees as well – It cannot be said that since lessee 
did not use the hostel as a residence but rather sub-leased the 
same to students/working women, such transaction does not fall 
within Entry 13 – Entry 13 of the Notification does not mandate 
that the lessee must use the residential dwelling as its own 
residence – Giving Entry 13 a narrow interpretation by holding 
that it is available only when the property so rented is used by 
service recipient themselves would ultimately lead to the legislative 
intent being defeated – Legislative intent behind this exemption 
clause is that a rented property that is used as residence should 
not suffer 18% GST or IGST – On facts, the ultimate use of the 
property as residence remains unchanged – It remained as ‘use 
for residence’ by students/working women – Exemption envisaged 
under Entry 13 is an activity specific exemption and not person 
specific exemption – Entry 13 was amended w.e.f. 18.07.2022, 
and in view thereof, no exemption available for respondent 1, as 
he has rented to a registered person – Through these appeals, the 
revenue is, in effect, trying to give retrospective application to the 
amendment made in 2022, which is impermissible – Explanation 
added to Entry 13 w.e.f. 01.01.2023 clearly shows that even if 
the rent is paid by a registered person, the exemption will be 
available if it is used for the purpose of own residence and is 
rented in the personal capacity – Thus, the intention from the 
beginning was to ensure that rental agreements for use of the 
property for residential purposes are granted exemption from GST. 
[Paras 48-53, 55, 61-63, 65-69]
Words and phrases – Term “residential dwelling” – Meaning of:
Held: In common parlance, ‘residential dwelling’ means any 
building, structure, or part of the building or structure other than 
offices or factories, that is used or intended to be used as a home, 
residence, or sleeping place by one person or by two or more 
368
[202

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.