LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

THE POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED versus CENTURY TEXTILES & INDUSTRIES LIMITED & ORS.

Citation: [2016] 11 S.C.R. 41 · Decided: 14-12-2016 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: A.K. SIKRI · Disposal: Disposed off

Cited by 1 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2016) 11 S.C.R.41 
THE POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED 
A 
v. 
CENTURY TEXTILES & INDUSTRIES LIMITED & ORS. 
(Civil Appeal No. 10951 of2016) 
DECEMBER 14, 2016 
[A. K. SIKRI AND R. BANUMATHI, JJ.] 
Electricity Act, 2003: 
s.164 and ss.2(5)114168169 - Exercise of powers of Telegraph 
Authority in certain cases - Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - ss.10, 
15, 16 -
Transmission Project - Proposed power lines to be laid by 
Power Grid, towers to be erected therefor on the land leased out to 
Century Textiles for mining - Right of Power Grid to erect such 
towers - Writ petition by Century Textiles contending that erection 
of towers would render a large chunk of mining area unusable 
precluding it from doing any blasting for mining purposes, thus the 
, towers b_e realigned - Dismissed by Single Judge as also by Division 
Bench, however directing the District Collector to work out the 
compensation payable to Century Textiles/State Government - Held: 
Power Grid has all the powers vested in a Telegraph Authority under 
the 1885 Act, including the power to eliminate any obstruction in 
the laying down of power lines - Thus, it was within its right to 
erect the towers over the mining area - Further, change in route 
alignment of proposed power line was unfeasible as out of 410 
towers which were to be erected under the project, 408 towers were 
already erected when the writ petition was filed by Century 
Textiles - Division Bench without differing with this factual position; 
including the fact that the project in question was in public interest, 
allowed the completion of project - Indian Electricity Ruf.es, 
1956 - r.83(2) - Electricity laws. 
' 
s.164 - Work of Licencees Rules, 2006 - r.3(l)(a) and r.3 
sub-rule(4) - Requirement of prior consent of owner of land before 
laying transmission lines -Applicability of- Plea of Century Textiles 
that erection of towers on the mining area was done without its 
prior consent - Held: In the instant case, r.3(l)(a) of the, 2006 
Rules is not applicable in view of s.164 of the Electricity Act, as 
Power Grid has all the powers vested in a Telegraph Authority -
41 
B 
c 
D 
E 
F 
G 
H 
42 
A 
B 
c 
D 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
rzo16111 s.c.R. 
d(l) of 2006 Rules ceases to apply in the case of Power Grid by 
virtue of the clause contained in sub-rule(4) of 1:3 which states that 
nothing contained in 1:3 shall effect powers conferred upon a 
licensee (Power Grid) u/s.164 of the Electricity Act. 
-Indian Telef.:raph Act. 1885 - s.16(c) - Co111pensatio11 claim 
under - Appropriate authority - Erection of towers for laying power 
transmission lines within mining lease area - Alleged loss to the 
lessee (Century Textiles) and to the State government - Division 
Bench directed the District Collector to work out the compensation 
payable to Century Textiles/State Govemment - Held: No claim for 
compensation was made either by Century Textiles or State 
Government - Further, if at all Century Textiles seeks compensation, 
appropriate action for it would be to file a suit before District Judge. 
Allowing the appeals by Power Grid, the Court 
HELD: 1.1 The submission made by Century Textiles was 
that its permission was not obtained which was needed as per 
Rule 3 of the Work of Licencees Rules, 2006. In the instant 
case, the aforesaid Rule is not applicable in view of Section 164 
of the Electricity Act, 2003. It is not in dispute that in exercise of 
powers under Section 164 of the Electricity Act, the powers of 
Telegrap~ Authority exercisable under Indian Telegraph Act, 
E ยท 1885 have been conferred upon the Power Grid. It may also be 
mentioned that a Central Transmission Utility (CTU) is a deemed 
licensee under the second proviso to Section 14 of the Electricity 
Act. Power Grid is a Central Transmission Utility and is, 
therefore, a deemed licensee under the Electricity Act. This 
F 
G 
coupled with the fact that Power Grid is treated as Authority under 
the Telegraph Act, 1885, it acquires all such powers which are 
vested in a Telegraph Authority under the provisions of the said 
Act including power to eliminate any obstruction in the laying 
down of power transmission lines. [Paras 18 to 201 (51-D-E, F-G; 
52-C-D) 
1.2 As per the provisions of the Telegraph Act, 1885, 
unobstructed access to lay down telegraph and/or electricity 
transmission lines is art imperative in th.e larger public interest. 
Electrification of villages all over the country and availability of 
telegraph li

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.