THE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA versus D. J. BAHADUR & ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
THE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA ...,_ v. D. J. BAHADUR & ORS. November 10, 1980. [V. R. KRISHNA IYER, R. S. PATHAK & A. D. KOSl!AL, JJ.] Life Insurance Corporation Act (Act 31), 1956, sections 11, 23 and 49, scope of-Whether a general law or a special law-Industrial Disputes Act (Act 14) 1947, sections 9A, 19(2), (6), 18, 23, 29-0bject of the Act, award and settlement, distinction from the point of view of legal force-Whether a special legislation vis-a-vis Life Insurance Corporation Act-Annual caslr bonus payable to Class-Ill and Class-IV employees of the Corporation under ·the settlement of 1974, e/Jecl o>f-Ejject of notice of termination of the settle- ments by the Corporation under sections 9A and 19(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act and section 49 of the Life .Insurance Corporation Act-Constitu- tion of India, 1950, Articles 12, 38, 39 and 43 and Regulation 58 of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (Staff) Regulations, 1960. The Life Insurance Corporation came into existence on the 1st of September, 1956, as a statutory authority established under the Life Insurance Corporation Act (Act 3 l), 1956. As from the said date all institutions carrying on Life Insurance business in India were nationalised to th~ extent of such busine:ss and their corresponding assets and liabilities were transferred to the Corporation. Section 11 of the Act provided for the transfer of service of those employees of such institutions who were connected with Life Insurance business immediately before the, said date to the Corporation and for some other matters. Section 23 of the Life Insurance Corporation Act gave to the Corporation the power to employ such number of persons as it thought fit for the purpose of enabling it to discharge its functions under the Act and declared that every person so empioyed or whose services stood transferred to the Corporation under section 11 would be liable to serve anywhere in India. Section 49 conferred on the Corporation the power to make regulation~ for the purpose of giving effect to the prnvisions of the Act with the previous- approval of the Central Government. Sub-section (2) of that section enumerated various matters in relation to which such power was particularly conferred. ·On 1st of June, 1957 the Central Government promulgated the Life Insurance Corporation (Alteration of Remuneration and other Terms ar.d Conditions of Service of Employees) Order, 1957 altering the remuneration and other terms and conditions of service of those employees of the Corporation whose service had been transferred to it under sub-section (1) of section 11. Clause 9 of the 1957 Order declared that no bonus would be paid but directed that the Corporation would set aside an amount every year for expenditure on schemes of general benefit to the employees such as free insurance scheme, medical benefit scheme and other am~nities to them. On the 26th June, 1959, the Central Government amended clause 9 of the 1957 Order 'SO as to provide that non-profit sharing bonus would be paid to those employees of the Corporation whose salary did not exceed Rs. 500 per month. On 2nd of July, 1959 · there was a settlement between the Corporation and its employees providing for paym~nt to them of cash ·bonus at the rate of It • A B c D E F G H SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1981] 1 S.C.R. A months' basic salary for the period from the 1st September, _1956 to the 31st December, 1961. In the year 1960 the Life Insurance Corporation of lndta (Staff) Regulations, 1960 were framed and Regulation 58 dealt \Vttb the payment of grant of no:1-profit sharing bonus to its employees. On 14th April. 1962 and 3rd August, 1963 orders were again issued, the effect of which WJ.5 to remove the Emit of Rs. 5'00 on the basic salary as a cor;dition of ~Jiaihi1ity for payment of Lonu1. lhe seaiemeoi dated 2r:d July, 1959 was D foMow(d bv three o~hers \vhich were arrived at on the 29th January, 1963. the 20th June, 1970 and the 26th June, 1972, respectively aroJ each one of VJtii£h · provided for payment of bonus at a particular rate. Disputes between the Corporation and its workmen in regard to the latter's conditions of service were received by two settlements dated the 24th )antJdl)'• 1974 and the 6th February, 1974, arrived at in pursuance of the C provisions of section 18 read with section 2(p) of the Industrial Disputes Act. -The Corporation was a part
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex