LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

THE FEDERATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY AND ORS. ETC. ETC. versus STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

Citation: [2000] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 151 · Decided: 04-08-2000 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: S.P. BHARUCHA · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

--
THE FEDERATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH CHAMBERS OF 
A 
COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY AND ORS. ETC. ETC. 
v. 
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS. ETC. ETC. 
AUGUST 4, 2000 
[S.P. BHARUCHA, SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI AND 
N. SANTOSH HEGDE, JJ.] 
Andhra Pradesh Non-Agricultural Lands Assessment Act, 1963: Sections 
B 
2( d), ( g) and 3-Interpretation of. 
C 
Section 3-Non-Agricultural lands-Levy of assessment on-Land used 
for any industrial, commercial or any other non-agricultural purpose-Levy 
of tax on-Condition precedent.for-Held, there must be a.finding that the land 
is in fact in presenti in use for industrial, commercial or any other non-
agricultural purpose-Land meant to be used or set apart for being used for 
D 
such purpose held not liable to levy. 
Interpretation of Statutes : 
Taxing Statute-Interpretation of-Should be construed strictly-Nothing 
can be read into it. 
These appeals have been preferred by some industries in Andhra 
Pradesh and their Federation. The appellants contest the view taken by a 
Bench of five Judges of the Andhra Pradesh High Court which interpreted 
the word 'used' in the Andhra Pradesh Non-Agricultural Lands Assessment 
Act, 1963 to mean "non-agricultural lands not only 'actually used' but are 
'meant to be used' or 'set apart for being used'. 
Allowing the appeals and setting aside the impugned order, the Court 
HELD : 1. It is only land which is actually in use for an industrial 
purpose as defined in the Andhra Pradesh Non-Agricultural Lands 
Assessment Act, 1963 that can be assessed to non-agricultural assessment at 
the rate specified for land used for industrial purposes. Section 3 of the Act 
speaks of "land is used for any industrial purpose", land is used for any 
commercial purpose and "land is used for any other non-agricultural 
purpose". The emphasis is on the words 'is used'. For the purposes of levy 
151 
E 
F 
G 
H 
152 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
(2000] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 
A 
of assessment on non-agricultural lands at the rate specified in the Schedule 
for land used for industrial purposes, therefore, there has to be a finding as 
a fact that the land is in fact in presenti in use for an industrial purpose. The 
same would apply to a commercial purpose or any other non-agricultural 
purpose. [155-E; 154-F] 
B 
c 
D 
E 
F 
G 
2. A taxing statute has to be strictly construed and nothing can be 
read into it. Having regard to the fact that the Act in question is a taxing 
statute, no court is justified in imputing to the legislature an intention that 
it has not clearly expressed in the language it has employed. [155-F] 
S. V. Cement Ltd. v. Revenue Divisional Officer, Nandyal & Ors., (1993) 2 
ALT 32; overruled. 
The State of Bombay v. Automobile and Agricultural Industries 
Corporation, Bombay, (1961) 1 ~ STC 122 and The Controller of Estate Duty, 
Gujarat v. Shri Kantilal Trikamlal, [1976] 4 SCC 643, referred to. 
Cape Brandy Syndicate v. Inland Revenue Commissioners, 9 (1921) 8 
KB 64, referred to. 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 1039 of 2000. 
From the Judgment and Order dated 13.8.96 of the Andhra Pradesh High 
Court in W.P. No. 13764 of 1987. 
WITH 
Civil Appeal Nos. 8828/97, 8836-37/97, 8838/97, 8839/97, 8840-44/97, 
8849/97, 1064/98, 2236/98, 3271198 and C.A. No. 4390/2000. 
C.S. Vaidyanathan, V.G. Pragasam, M.A. Chinnasamy, V. Shekhar, Ms. 
D. Bharathi Reddy, A.T.M. Sampath, A.D.N. Rao and G. Prabhakar for the 
appearing parties. 
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by 
BHARUCHA, J. Leave granted in S.L.P.(C)No. 2877 of 1998. 
A Bench of five Judges of the Andhra Pradesh High Court interpreted 
the word "used" in The Andhra Pradesh Non-Agricultural Lands Assessment 
Act, 1963 ("the said Act") to mean "non-agricultural lands not only 'actually 
H 
used" but are 'meant to be.used or. 'set apart for being used'." This view is 
-
FEDERATION OF A.P. CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRYβ€’Β·. STATE-LBHARUCHA, I.] 
153 
contested in these appeals by some industries in Andhra Pradesh and, with 
A 
permission, by their Federation. 
The said Act was enacted to provide for the levy of assessment on lands 
used for non-agricultural purposes. Section 2(d) defines 'industrial purpose', 
so far as it is relevant to these appeals, to mean "any purpose connected with 
an industrial undertaking where the process of manufacturing any article .is 
B 
carried on with the aid of power ...... " 'Non-agricultural land' is defined by 
Section 2(g) to mean "land other than the land used

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.