LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

THE DRUGS INSPECTOR AND ANR. versus M/S. FIZIKEM LABORATORIES PVT. LTD. AND ANR.

Citation: [2008] 5 S.C.R. 465 · Decided: 24-03-2008 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: A.K. MATHUR · Disposal: Case Allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2008] 5 S.C.R. 465 
THE DRUGS INSPECTOR AND ANR. 
A 
v 
MIS. FIZIKEM LABORATORIES PVT. LTD. AND ANR. 
(Criminal Appeal No. 533 of 2008) 
MARCH 24, 2008 
B 
[A.K. MATHUR AND ALTAMAS KABIR, JJ.] 
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940: ss.18, 19 rw s.17B(d), 
s.27(b)(fi) -Adulteration and misbranding in Ayurvedic drugs 
- Ozomen capsules and Ozomen forte containing 55.2 mg of c 
sildenafil citrate per capsule - Accused holding allopathic and 
Ayurvedic licence but not holding licence to manufacture 
sildenafil citrate - Prosecution launched under Chapter IV -
High Court quashed proceeding holding that since ozomen 
capsule had component like sildenafil citrate, therefore, they D 
) 
are misbranded, spurious or adulterated for which prosecution 
could be only launched under Chapter /VA- Correctness of-
Held: Not correct - Inspector appointed under Chapter IV is 
competent to launch prosecution under said sections -
Sildenafil citrate is an Allopathic drug - It cannot be used for E 
the Ayurvedic medicines without displaying in prescribed 
manner on the label or container thereof or list of active 
ingredients contained in it together with the quantities thereof 
- A/so it cannot be used by person not holding licence for it -
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - s.482. 
F 
The prosecution case was that the Inspector of Drug 
took samples of ozomen capsules and ozomen forte from 
the premises of respondent-accused and sent it for 
analysis. According to the report of Government Analyst, 
Ozomen capsules under different batches contained 45.2 G 
mg of sildenafil citrate per capsule. Prosecution was 
launched against the respondents for contravention of 
ss.18(c), 18(a) (i) read with s.17B(d) of the Drugs and 
Cosmetics Act. 
465 
H 
466 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2008] 5 S.C.R. 
A 
The allegation of prosecution was that the sildenafil 
citrate is an allopathic drug used for erectile dysfunction; 
that accused had no licence for the manufacture of 
sildenafil citrate and they were mislabeling the Ayurvedic 
drugs; and that the respondent-accused company was 
B holding Allopathic as well as Ayurvedic licence but the 
company did not hold the licence to manufacture 
sildenafil citrate. 
The respondent's contention was that they had been 
holding licence for the Ayurvedic preparation and for any 
C Ayurvedic preparation of spurious or misbranded nature, 
Inspector appointed under Chapter IV was not competent 
to launch prosecution. 
High Court quashed the proceedings holding that 
since Ozomen capsules had a component like sildenafil 
D citrate, therefore, they may be misbranded, spurious or 
adulterated for which the prosecution could only be 
launched by the Inspector authorised under Chapter IVA. 
But the prosecution in this case was launched under 
Chapter IV and the Inspector who has been appointed 
E under Chapter IVA could have launched the prosecution. 
Hence the present appeal. 
Allowing the appeal, the Court 
HELD: 1. The provisions in Chapter IV and Chapter 
F IVA of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act are almost identical. 
Chapter IVA deals with special branch of medicines like, 
Ayurvedic, Siddha and Unani drugs whereas Chapter IV 
deals with branches other than Chapter IVA. [Para 6] 
[475-A] 
G 
2. Sildenafil citrate is a new drug and it is an Allopathic 
drug. This cannot be used for the Ayurvedic medicines 
without displaying in the prescribed manner on the label 
or container thereof or list of active ingredients contained 
in it together with the quantities thereof. It is also 
H punishable under s.18 (a)(iii) read with s.27 (d) of the Act. 
THE DRUGS INSPECTOR AND ANR. v. M/S. FIZIKEM 
467 
LABORATORIES PVT. LTD. & ANR. 
The very fact of dealing with sildenafil citrate drug and A 
distributing the same after making a different component 
of Ayurvedic drug itself constitutes an offence. It is 
erroneous to say that since the accused is dealing with 
Ayurvedic drugs therefore, only the Inspector who is 
authorized under Chapter IVA could launch the B 
prosecution and not the Inspector appointed under r' 
Chapter IV. The accused has used sildenafil citrate which 
is an allopathic drug. Sildenafil citrate is a white to off. 
white crystalline power with a solubility of 3.5 mg/ml in 
water and molecular weight of 666.7. Viagra (sildenafil c 
citrate) is formulated as blue, film-coated rounded-
diamond shaped tablets equivalent to 25mg, 50 mg and 
100 mg of sidenafil for oral administration. In addition to 
the active ingredient, si

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.