LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

THE COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX, U.P. versus S/S. PARIKH GRAMODYOG SANSTHAN

Citation: [2010] 9 S.C.R. 881 · Decided: 11-08-2010 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: D.K. JAIN · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2010) 9 S.C.R. 881 
1 
THE COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX, U.P. 
A 
v. 
S/S. PARIKH GRAMODYOG SANSTHAN 
(Civil Appeal No. 651 of 2005) 
... _ 
AUGUST 11, 2010 
B 
[D.K. JAIN AND H.L. DATTU, JJ.] 
UP. Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Entry 74 (f) and amended 
Entry 74 (a)(iii) - 'Voltage Stabilizer' - Levy of sales tax -
Classification of, as 'electrical goods' under Entry No. 16 of c 
the Schedule or as 'electronic goods' under Entry No. 7 4(f) 
- Held: Automatic voltage stabilizer involves the operation 
of a number of electronic components -
Many of its 
components might use electricity but that cannot be the sole 
reason for classifying it as an electrical goods - Electrical 
D 
device can be electronic device, but electronic device cannot 
be electrical device - Thus, taking into consideration the 
components, purpose for which it is used and principles on 
which it works, voltage stabilizer is 'electronic goods' -
Notification No. 1223 dt 31.03.1992. 
E 
Voltage stabilizer - Purpose, components and functions 
- Explained. 
Words and Phrases: 'Electrical goods' and 'electronic 
goods' - Meaning of. 
F 
The respondent-assessee was engaged in the 
business of manufacture of voltage stabilizer and sales 
thereof. The assessing officer passed an assessment 
order directing the respondent to pay certain amount as 
G 
sales tax, on basis of the rate applicable to electrical 
goods under Entry No. 16 of Schedule to U.P. Trade Tax 
Act, 1948. The respondent contended that they were 
liable to pay taxes at the rates applicable to electronic 
881 
H 
882 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2010] 9 S.C.R. 
A goods under the old Entry 74(f) and the amended Entry 
" 
7 4(a)(iii) of the Notification No.1223 dated 31.03.1992. In 
appeal, the tribunal held that the voltage stabilizers were 
'electronic' goods and not 'electrical' goods'. The High 
Court upheld the order of the tribunal. Therefore, the 
B appellants-revenue filed the instant appeals. 
Dismissing the appeals, the Court 
HELD: 1. An automatic voltage stabilizer involves the 
operation of a number of electronic components. A 
C voltage stabilizer might have many components some of 
which use electricity. This cannot be the sole reason for 
classifying it as an electrical goods. An electrical device 
can be an electronic device, but an electronic device 
cannot be an electrical device. The tribunal, which was 
D the last fact finding authority, after taking into 
consideration the components of voltage stabilizer, the 
purpose for which it is used and the principles on which 
it works came to the conclusion that the voltage stabilizer 
is electronic goods, for the purpose of taxation under U.P. 
E Trade Tax Act, 1948. The reasoning and conclusion 
reached by the tribunal is accepted. Therefore, there is 
no infirmity in the impugned judgment. [Paras 18 and 22] 
[892-E-G; 893-G] 
2. Entry 74 of the Notification No.1223 dated 31st 
F March, 1992 and the subsequent Notification No. 3420 
dated 1st October, 1994 speaks of electronic goods. 
There is i:to material change in these two Notifications, 
except change in the rate of tax on certain electronic 
items. Entry 74(f) of the earlier Notification and 74(a)(iii) 
G of the subsequent Notification speaks of all the other 
electronic goods not specified any where else in the 
Schedule or in any other Notification. [Para 12] [889-C-D] 
3. Electrical Goods is such articles the use of which 
H cannot be had except with the application of electrical 
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX, U.P. v. SIS. 
883 
PARIKH GRAMODYOG SANSTHAN 
energy. It must be kept in mind that an electronic device 
A 
can be an electrical device but an electrical device cannot 
an electronic device. The electronic goods cannot be 
used without the aid of electricity is not the only criterion 
to determine whether those goods can be treated as 
electrical goods. The really important criterion is whether 
B 
those goods are regarded as electrical goods in common 
parlance. It might consist of electronic systems, 
instruments, appliances, apparatus, equipment operating 
on electronic principles and all types of electronic 
components, parts and materials. [Paras 13 and 14] [889- c 
F-H; 890-A-B] 
The Law Lexicon by Justice T.P. Mukherjee 4th Ed, 1989 
p.574;/nterpretation of Words, Phrases & Commodities under 
Sa/es Tax Lawsby Sri M.P. Agarwal - referred to. 
D 
4. A voltage stabilizer is a device which is able to 
deliver relatively constant output voltage while input 
voltage and load cu

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.