THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL, II CALCUTTA versus M/S. NAGA HILLS TEA CO. LTD.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
51() 'liHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL, II CALCUITA v. M/S. NAGA HILLS TEA CO. LTD. February 8, 1973 [K. S. I!EGDE, P.,JAGANMOHAN REDDY AND H. R. KHANNA, JJ.l Finnnce Act, 1959, First Schedule, Part 11, Paragl'aph D--Carry over of unabsorbed rebate--Scope of. For the assessment year 1959-60 the total income of the assessee. company was utilised and a rebate was allowed, on the corporation tax payable by it, under the provisions of Finance Act, 1959. Thereafter, that reb-ate was wiardrawn on the ground that there was an unabsorbed reduction of rebate in the assessment year 1957-58. For the assessment year 1958-59 the assessee's assessment disclosed a loss and no corpora- tion tax was legal for that year. It was contended by the assessee that the unab~rbed reduction in rebate for the year 1957-58 could only be carried forward and set off against the rebate for the assessment year 1958·1959 under the provisions of Finance Act, 1958, and as there was no rebate available for the assessment year 1958-59 the unabsorbed reduo· tion in rebate exhausted itself and could not be further set off against the rebate available in the assessment year 1959-60. The contention was rejected by the Income-tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commi~ sioner. The Tribunal and the High Court in reference, however, held in favour of the assessee. Dismissing the appeal to this Court, HELD : It is a cTear from paragraph D of Part II of the First Schedule to the Finance Act, 1959, that it does not provide for carry over of any unabsorbed rebate from year to year. All that the provision provides for is that if there is any unabsorbed reduction of rebate in the assessment year 1958-59, then that can be taken into consideration while allowing rebate in the assessment year 1959-60. A power in favour of the revenue to tatce mto consideration any unabsorbed reduction in rebate for any year prior to 1958-59 cannot be read into the provision. At any rate, the view taken by the High Court appears to be a reasonable one, and, it a provision of taxing statute can be reasonably interpreted in two ways, that interpretation which is favourable to the assessee must be accepted. [513F-H; 5140-E] CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No.--496 of 1970. Appeal bv Certificate from the Judgment and order dated August 13, 1964 of the Calcutta High Court at Calcutta in Income· tax Reference No. 148 ot 1966. B c D E F G T. A. Ramachandran, S. P. Nayar and R. N. Sachthey, for the appellant. · H B. Sen, Lellu Seth, 0. P. Kizaitan and B. P. Maheshwari, for the respondent. C.I.1'. v. NAGA HILLS TEA CO. LTD. (Hegde, J.) 511 A The Judgment of the Court was delivered by HBGDE, J. This appeal biY certificate arises from the decision of the Calcutta High Court in a reference under section 66 ( 1) of the Indian Income-taX. Act 1922 (to be hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') . The question referred to the High Court for its 8 its opinion reads : · c E "Whether, on the facts and in the c;;ircwnstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in boldiJJ& that the assessee, having not been assessed to super-tax fot the assessment year 1958-59, the unabSorbed reduction in rebate under clause (i)(a) of the second proviso to Paragraph D of Part II of the First Schedule to the Finance Act, 1957, could not be set oft against the rebate available to the assessee under the Finance Act, 1959, and that accordingly the Income-tax Officer was not justified in reducing the rebate of Rs. 16,114/- available to the assessee for the assesment year 1959- 60?" Followi~g its earlier decision in Commissioner of Income Tax, West Bengal-I v. Deoria Sugar Mills Ltd.,(l) the High Court answered that question in favour of the assessee. Aggrieved by that decision the Commissioner of Income Tax for West Bengal has brought this appeal. The facts material for the purpose of deciding ~ question as could be gathered from the case stated by the Tribunal may now be set out. The assessment year y.rith which we are con- . cemed in this case is 1959-60; the relevant accounting year being the calendar year 1958. The -assessee is a Tea Company. For the assessment year 1959-60 it was assessed to a total income of F Rs. 55,257/ -. The Corporation tax payable by the assessee on that amount was computed at Rs. 26,357 I-. On that a rebate of Rs. 16,114/ - was allowed under the provisions of the Fmance Act 1959. T
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex