LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

THE CITIZEN CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, HYDERABAD versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE~9(1), HYDERABAD

Citation: [2017] 9 S.C.R. 361 · Decided: 08-08-2017 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: A.K. SIKRI · Disposal: Dismissed

Cited by 2 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2017] 9 S.C.R. 361 
THE CITIZEN CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, 
A 
THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, HYDERABAD 
v. 
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE~9(1), . 
HYDERABAD 
(Civil Appeal No. I 0245 of2017) 
B 
. 
AUGUST08,2017 
. 
[A. K. 81100 ANDASllOKBHUSHAN, JJ.] . 
Co-operative · Soi:ieties -
Income Tax Act, 196I. · -
· s. 80P(2)(a)(i) ·:- Deduction under~ ;When. not available ~Appellant-
C 
society claiming to be a co-operative i;ociety, sought deduction in 
respect of its income -Assessing Officer held that deduction uls. 80P 
was not admissible to the appellant as the benefit of deduction was 
admissible to those co-operative societies that carry on business of 
banking or providing credit facilities to its members, however, the 
D 
appellant was carrying on the banking business for pil.blic at large 
and its operation was not con.fined to its members only - Appeal 
thereagainst rejected by CIT (A) upholding the oiver of Assessing 
·Officer - Further appeal to ITAT and High Court, dismissed - On 
appeal, held: Appellant was catering to two distinct categories of 
people, the first was that of 'resident members' and the other 
E 
category was of 'nominal members' who were making deposits with 
the assessee for the purpose of obtaining loans, etc. and were not 
members in real sense - Thus,. the activity ofthe appellant was that 
of .finance business and cannot be termed as co-operative society -
Further, the appellant was engaged in the activity of granting loans 
F 
to general public as well - Therefore, the appellant cannot be 
treated as a co-operative society meant only for its members and . 
providing credit facilities to its members - Such a society cannot 
claim the benefit of s. 80P - Mutually Aided Co-operative Societies 
Act, I995 - Banking. 
Income Tax Act, I96I - s. BOP - Interpretation of - Held: 
G 
Section BOP is a benevolent provision enacted by the Parliament to 
encourage and promote growth of co-operative sector in the 
economic life of the country - Therefore, such a provision has to be 
read liberally, reasonably and in favour of the assessee -
Interpretation of Statutes - Benevolent/Beneficial provision. 
H 
361 
362 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2017) 9 S.C.R. 
A 
Income Tax Act, 1961 - s. 80P(4) - 'Co-operative Bank' -
When not - Whether activity/business of the appellant was that qf a 
co-operative bank governed by Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and 
hence it was not entitled to benefit of deduction u/s. 80P - Held: 
Sub-sec.(4) to s. 80P is in the nature of a proviso and provides that 
8 
deduction u/s. 80P shall not be admissible to a co-operative bank -
Howeve1; in the instant case, the appellant does not get covered 
under the definition of 'co-operative bank' - Further, RBI itself 
had clarified that the business of appellant does not amount to that 
of a co-operative bank - Therefore, appellant would not come within 
the mischief of sub-sec. (4) of s. BOP - Finance Act; 2006 - Banking 
C Regulation Act, 1949. 
Dismissing the appeal, the Court 
HELD: 1.1 Section SOP of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is a 
benevolent provision which is enacted by the Parliament in order 
to encourage and promote growth of co-operative sector in the 
D economic life of the ('Ountry. It was done pursuant to declared 
policy of the Government. Therefore, such a provision has to be 
read liberally, reasonably and in favour of the assessee. It is also 
trite that such a provision has to be construed as to effectuate 
the object of the Legislature and not to defeat it. Therefore, all 
E those co-operative societies which fall within the purview of 
Section SOP of the 1961 Act are entitled to deduction in respect 
of any income referred to in sub-section (2) thereof. Clause( a) of 
sub-section (2) gives exemption of whole of the amount of profits 
and gains of business attributable to any one or more of such 
activities which are mentioned in sub-section (2).[Para 18)(375-
F C-F) 
G 
H 
1.2 Sub-section (i) of clause (a) of sub-section (2) recognises 
two kinds of co-operative societies, namely: (i) those carrying on 
the business of banking and; (ii) those providing credit facilities 
to its members. (Para 19)[375-F-G) 
1.3 With the insertion of sub-section (4) by the Finance 
Act, 2006, which is in the nature of a proviso to Section SOP, it is 
made clear that such a deduction shall not be admissible to a co-
operative bank. However, if it is a primary agriculture credit 
society or a primary co-operative agricul

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.