TATA ENGINEERING AND LOCOMOTIVE COMPANY LTD. versus THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A TATA ENGINEERING AND LOCOMOTIVE COMPANY LTD. v. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. OCTOBER 7, 1994 B (R.M. SAHAI AND N.P. SINGH, JJ.] Bihar Finance Act, 1981: Section 13(J)(b )--Levy of tax on concessional rate-Notification C regarding-Expression 'Industrial Raw Material (Inputs)'-Construction of. D E Manufacturer of Motor Vehicles, truck and bus chassis-Purchase of items such as tyres, tubes, batteries and use in vehicles-Held entitled to purchase goods at concessional rate of tax. Words and Phrases : 'Raw Material'-Meaning of. Section 13(l)(b) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 provides for special rate of tax on sale and purchase of goods used for manufacture or processing by a registered dealer in the State. In exercise of the power conferred by the said section, the State of Bihar issued a notification No. S 0-604 dated 12.4.82 directing that the sales tax on Industrial raw material (inputs) payable under section 13(1)(b) shall be at the rate of one percentum. The appellant-company was manufacturing motor-vehicles, trucks, bus chassis, excavators and other engineering products. For this purpose, F it was purchasing commodities such as tyres, tubes, batteries and various other items which were used in producing the vehicles. The company claimed that the aforesaid goods purchased by It being raw material having been required directly for use in manufacturing goods for sale in the State or in the course of inter-state trade, it was entitled to conces- G sional rate of tax of 1% on such goods. The Deputy Commissioner, Sales Tax rejected the claim holding that items of inputs were in a finished state and were just to be fitted in the chassis without any further modification etc. Therefore, the purchase of such fittings was not covered by the notifica- tion. H The appellant filed a writ petition before the High Court which was 410 TATAENGG.&LOCOMOTIVECO. LTD.v. STATE 411 dismissed by the Division B;nch holding that the words 'industrial raw material (inputs)' could not be given such a wide meaning as to result in widening the scope of concessional rate even to finished products. Against the order of the High Court, the appellant preferred appeal in this court. Allowing the appeal and setting aside the order of the High Court, this Court HELD : 1. The appellant is entitled to concessional rate of tax at 1 % for such items as tyres, tubes and batteries which were used in the manufacture of the vehicle etc., as raw- material. [415-D] 2. The word 'raw-material' has no fixed meaning. It may vary with the use to which it is put. An item may be raw-material for manufacturing goods 'A' and the goods so prodnced may itself be raw-material for goods A B c 'B'. For instance, batteries, tyres and tnbes are by themselves finished products. They on their own cannot be considered to be raw-material. But when it is used for manufacture of a vehicle then it becomes raw-material D for it as it is essential and necessary for producing the good in which it has been used. No vehicle can operate or work nor can it be said tu have been produced unless tyres, tubes and batteries are fixed to it. Use of these items is integrally connected with the ultimate production. They retain their identity in the end- product. But that could not exclude it from being treated as raw- material. The special rate of tax could be levied on any goods used in the manufacture. But the Government restricted it to raw materials. Yet the notification having been issued under Section 13(1)(b) the benefit would extend to every raw-material used in the manufacture of goods. In other words the concessional rate was available not only to raw-material but such raw-material as was used in the manufacture of goods. [ 415-E, 415-H, 416-A-C-E] 3. Raw material has been fnrther explained by using the word 'inputs', which dictionarily means, 'what is put in', 'enter', 'enter system'. E F The tyres, tubes and batteries were purchased for being put in the vehicle, which could not be operative without it. They were thns 'input'. The u_se of G this word was indicative that the benefit was intended for every item which was raw-material in the widest sense made wider by using the expression ยท'input'. The purpose was for broadening the meaning of raw-material by inclndlng in it even those item which conld be placed in the vehicle, to make it marketable as vehicles. The concessional rate of tax is thus applicable H
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex