LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

TAMIL NADU MEDICAL SERVICES CORPORATION LIMITED versus TAMIL NADU MEDICAL SERVICES CORPORATION EMPLOYEES WELFARE UNION & ANR.

Citation: [2024] 5 S.C.R. 596 · Decided: 17-05-2024 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: SANJAY KAROL

cites 5 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2024] 5 S.C.R. 596 : 2024 INSC 446
Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Limited 
v. 
Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Employees  
Welfare Union & Anr.
(Civil Appeal No. 6511 of 2024)
17 May 2024
[Sanjay Karol* and Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Whether the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment 
of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 would apply to the 
parties; whether the Corporation can be termed as an industrial 
establishment as per the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Shops 
and Establishments Act, 1947; and whether the members of the 
Union would qualify as workmen and thus, would be eligible for 
permanent status u/s. 3 of the Act; and whether the suggestion to 
institute an ‘Industrial Disputes Claim’ questioning non-employment 
was sustainable, given that the Inspector of Labour had already 
passed orders in that regard.
Headnotes†
Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of 
Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 – s. 2(3), 7 – 
Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 – ss. 
2(3), 2(6) – Employees of Government Corporation sought 
regularisation – Inspector of labour conferred permanent 
status to the workmen – High Court upheld the same and 
directed to provide employment to the employees – Cross 
appeals – Issue as regards, applicability of the 1981 Act to 
the parties – Corporation, if could be termed as an industrial 
establishment as per the 1947 Act – Members of the Union, 
if would qualify as workmen and thus, would be eligible for 
permanent status u/s. 3 of the Act – High Court on remand, 
if could have ignored the order of the Inspector of Labour 
and suggested to institute an ‘Industrial Disputes Claim’ 
questioning non-employment:
Held: Activities conducted by the Corporation fall under those 
mentioned u/s. 2(3) of the 1947 Act – Construction work, which 
* Author
[2024] 5 S.C.R. 
597
Tamil Nadu Medical Services Corporation Limited v. Tamil Nadu  
Medical Services Corporation Employees Welfare Union & Anr.
the Corporation, by its own admission, carries out, is also for non-
governmental bodies such as firms, companies, and individuals – 
Language of s. 7 of the 1981 Act implies that this Act shall not 
apply to those workmen who are engaged in the construction of 
buildings and the like or other construction work be it structural, 
mechanical, or electrical and thus, the establishments and its 
workmen engaged exclusively in the work of construction, shall 
be exempted – However, this would not allow the Corporation to 
wash its hands off the responsibilities or obligations under the 
Act, since the construction to be undertaken by the Corporation, 
is only one of the many activities to be undertaken by it – To take 
all the workers out of the purview of the Act, especially, when 
the said workers were not the ones undertaking construction, 
unwarranted – Employee having uninterruptedly continued in 
service for 480 days or more for 24 months, having been met, 
the Act would apply to the parties – Furthermore, the scope of 
remand was limited – Since the High Court concluded that the 
Act would apply, no reason for it to disturb the finding of the 
Inspector of Labour – It ought to have simply ordered that the 
order of Labour Inspector which concluded that members of 
Union be given permanent employment, be complied with. [Paras 
21-25, 27, 28]
Case Law Cited
State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi [2006] 3 SCR 953 : (2006) 
4 SCC 1; Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. 
Casteribe Rajya Parivahan Karmachari Sanghathana [2009] 13 
SCR 937 : (2009) 8 SCC 556; U.P. Power Corporation Limited 
& Anr. v. Bijli Mazdoor Sangh & Ors. [2007] 5 SCR 256 : (2007) 
5 SCC 755; ONGC Limited v. Petroleum Coal Labour Union & 
Ors. [2015] 5 SCR 474 : (2015) 6 SCC 494; Ajay Pal Singh v. 
Haryana Warehousing Corporation (2015) 6 SCC 321; Ranbir 
Singh v. S.K. Roy, Chairman, Life Insurance Corporation of 
India & Anr. [2022] 10 SCR 986 : (2022) SCC OnLine SC 
521 – referred to. 
List of Acts
Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent 
Status to Workmen) Act, 1981; Companies Act, 1956; Tamil 
Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947; Industrial Disputes 
Act, 1947.
598
[2024] 5 S.C.R.
Digital Supreme Court Reports
List of Keywords
Industrial Disputes Claim; Inspector of Labour; Industrial 
establishment; Members of the Union; Workmen; Permanent status 
to workmen; Regularisation; Commercial element; Construction 
work; Non-governmen

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.