LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

T.N. ELECTRICITY BOARD & ANR. versus T.N .. ELECTRICITY BOARD THOZHILALAR AYKKIYA SANGAM

Citation: [2008] 2 S.C.R. 945 · Decided: 14-02-2008 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: A.K. MATHUR, AFTAB ALAM · Disposal: Case Allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2008] 2 S.C.R. 945 
T.N. ELECTRICITY BOARD & ANR. 
A 
v. 
T.N .. ELECTRICITY BOARD THOZHILALAR AYKKIYA 
SANGAM 
(Civil Appeal No. 1279 of 2008) 
FEBRUARY 14, 2008 
a 
-
~ 
(A.K. MATHUR AND AFTAB ALAM, JJ.) 
~ 
Service Law 
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Service Regulations, 1967: c 
Note-3 - Prescribing criteria of N. T. C. or N.A. C. 
Certificate for post of Helper - Further laying down that 
"candidates holding N. TC.IN.A. C. recruited as Helper shall 
not be eligible for internal selection to post of Junior Assistant D 
and Typist including Steno-typist" - HELD: The TN. Electricity 
Board has, on a rational basis, decided to lay down a 
qualification for appointment to the post of Helper i.e. NTCI 
NAC, and provided a channel of promotion for such persons 
to the higher post on technical side - Such provision cannot E 
be said to be ultra vires Articles 14, 16 and 19(1 )(g) of the 
Constitution - This is a policy decision of Board and it is the 
-
Board who has to decide suitability and channel of promotion 
for such post - It is prerogative of Board to decide that what 
,,. 
shall be the channel of promotion for technical and for non 
technical persons - Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and F 
'• 
19(1 )(g) -
Administrative Law -
Policy decision of 
administrative authority 
P. U. Joshi and Ors: Vs. Accountant General, Ahmedabad 
and Ors. 2003(2) sec 632 - relied on. 
G 
l~ 
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction : Civil Appeal No. 1279 of 
2008. 
From the final Judgement and Order dated 20/04/2006 of 
945 
H 
946 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2008] 2 S.C.R. 
A the High Court of Judicature at Madras in W.A. No. 1692/1999. 
k-
P.H. Parekh, E.R. Kumar, Shakun Sharma,Arjun Garg (for 
Mis Parekh And Co.) for the Appellants. 
V. Shekhar, Gulnar, G. Umapathy, Rohit Singh and Rakesh 
B K. Sharma for the Respondent. 
The following Order of the Court was delivered 
We have heard learned counsel for the parties. 
c 
Leave granted. 
This appeal by special leave is directed against the order 
passed by the Division Bench of the Madras High Court dated 
20th April, 2006 whereby the Division Bench has affirmed the 
order passed by the learned Single Judge where the learned 
D Single Judge has struck down Note 3 of the Tamil Nadu Electricity· 
Board Service Regulation, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as the 
"Regulations") and directed that all the persons who were 
appointed Helpers may be considered for the post of Junior 
Assistant and other administrative posts. 
E 
Aggrieved against the said order of the Division Bench, 
the present SpeCial Leave Petition has been filed. 
For disposal of this appeal, it is necessary to refer a few 
facts:-
F 
Petition No.3314 of 1993 was filed by the Tamil Nadu 
Electricity Board Thozhilalar Aykkiya Sangam, represented by 
its General Secretary praying that Note 3 of the Regulation may 
be declared as ultra vires being violative of Articles 14 and 16 
of the Constitution. 
G 
The grievance of the Sangam was that the classification 
of candidates, holding l.T.I. Certificates and who have got 
National Trade Certificate/National Apprenticeship Certificate 
(NTC)/NAC) and recruited as Helpers in Regular Works 
Establishment (REW) as a distinct class is not based on any 
H 
I 
,._ "!!-
1-
11 , 
I'...
..,, \ 
~,·
--{ 
T.N. ELECTRICITY BOARD & ANR. v. TN. ELECT. 
947 
BOARD THOZHILALAR AYKKIYA SANGAM 
...._ 
intelligible differentia, which has rational nexus to the objective A 
of selection to the post of Junior Assistant/Assessors, etc. It is 
also their grievance that in view of the above mentioned Note 3, 
the members of their Association are debarred from applying 
for the post of Junior Assistant along with other similarly placed 
candidates, possessing lesser qualification. 
B 
It was· also alleged by Electricity Board that the nature of 
... 
work and channel of promotions to the Helpers in Regular Works 
~ 
Establishment is entirely different from that of Junior Assistant/ 
Typist/Assessors. According to them, the Helpers are utilized c 
for field work of technical nature and their channel of promotion 
is Wireman, Lineman, Foreman and Junior Engineer whereas, 
Junior Assistants are posted for clerical works in office in 
Administrative and Accounts Cadre and their channel of 
promotion is Assistant, Administrative/Accounts Supervisor and 
Assistant Administrative Officer/Assistant Accounts Officer. 
D 
, ..... 
Therefore, channels of promotions for these Helpers was 
in technical side. It was subm

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.