LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

SYED AHMED AGA ETC. versus STATE OF MYSORE & ANOTHER

Citation: [1975] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 473 · Decided: 02-05-1975 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: HANS RAJ KHANNA · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

T 
• 
I 
SYED AHMED AGA ETC. 
v. 
STATE OF MYSORE & ANOTHER 
May 2, 1975 
[H. R. KHANNA, M. H. BEG ANDY. V. CHANDRACHUD, JJ.] 
Constitution-Articles 19(1) (g), 304(b) & 32-Whether a 32 petition main-
tainable to chalfenf(e oon-conipliance with proviso to Article 304(b)--Mysore 
Silk Worm Seed & Cocoon (Regulation of Production, Supply & Distribution) 
Act. · 1960--A1nendn1ents whether requires 
fresh 
sanction rl the President 
under Article 304(b)-lncrease in quantum of pe1Ullty whether amounts to 
-473 
A 
B 
additional restrict~ons-Nature of penalty. 
C 
The petitioners challenged the validity of amendments made to Mysore Silk 
Worm Seed and Cocoon (Regulation of Production, Supply and Distribution) 
Act, 1960, on the ground that the -amendments imposed aditional restrictions 
upon the rights of the petitioners to carry on trade and business without obtain-
ing the Presidential sanction required by proviso to Art. 304(b) of the Consti-
tution.· 
The Principal Act had received the sanction of the President. 1bc reasona-
D 
bleness of any restrictions e~ther of th~ principal Act or of the amendments has 
net been challenged. It is not disputed that the Presidential sanction was not 
obtained for th~ amendments. 
The respondents contended-
( I) No petition under Article 32 of the Constitution can lie to challenge 
restrictiom covered by Article 304(b), since the freedom of trade 
envisaged 
E 
by Article 304(b) is different from freedom of trade guaranteed by Art. 19(1) 
(g). 
(2) The amendments did not impose additional restrictions on the 
peti-
tiooers' right to carry on trade and business. Amendments merely introduced 
the restrictions which were contained in the principal Act and the statutory roles 
1nade thereunder and therefore did not impose any additional restrictions. 
Section 12 of the princ!ral Act reads as under : 
"12. Penalties---(!) 
Any person who contravenes the provisigns 
of section 3 er 4 shall be punishable with fine which may extend to 
one hundred rupees. 
(2) any rearer who contravenes the provisions of section 6 or 7 or 
any other provision of this Act or any rule, order or notification! made 
thereunder, shall be punishable with fine which may extend to fifty 
rupees. 
(3) Any licensed buyer who contravenes the provisions ·of sections 
7 or 8 or any other provision of this Act or any rule, order or notifi-~ 
cation made thereunder, shall be punishable with fine which may extend 
to two hundred and fifty rupees. 
(4) Save as otherwise provided in sub-section (!), (2) and (3), 
any person who contravenes any of the provisions Of this Act or of 
any rule. order or notification thereunder, shall be punishable with 
fine which may extend to t\vo hundred and fifty rupees. 
(5) (a) Without prejudice to any punishment under the preceding 
sub~sections the Director 
of 
Sericulture 
in 
Mysore 
may, 
after 
giving a reasonable opportunity to the person conc.erned to be heard 
suspend or cancel the licence granted to any person for preparing silk~ 
worm seed if such person is convicted at least twice for an offence 
under this Act. 
-
F 
G 
H 
• 
474 
A 
B 
c 
D 
E 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
(1975] SUPP· S.C.R. 
. (b) Any person aggrie\'e<l by the suspension or cancellation of 
a. licence under clause (a) may :.ippeal to the Government within such 
time as may be prescribed and the decision of the Government on 
such appeal shall be final and shall not be 'called in question in anv 
Couri of Law". 
· 
Amendments to section 12 \Vere made by section 7 and 8 of the ,-\mending 
Act which read as under :-
"7. Amendment of section 12. Jn s-ection 12 of the rincipal Act,-
(1) in suf>..section (1), for the words "one hundred rupees··, the 
words "two hundred rupees" shall be substituted; 
(2) in sub-section (2), for the words and figures ;.section 6 or 7 
qr any other provision of this Act or any rule, ordler or notification 
made thereunder", the words, figures, brackets and letter, 
"section 
6'1 or clause (a) of sub-section (I) of section T' shall be substituted; 
(3) after sub-section (2), the following sub-section shall be inser-
ted. namely :-
"(2A) Any person who contrav~nes the provisions of clause (b) 
of sub-section (1) of section 7 or sub-section (2) of that section shall 
be punishable with imprisonment which may extend td three months or 
with fine which may extend to five hundred ntpees or with both" ; 
(4) for 
sub-section (3), 
the following 
sub-section shall 
be 
substituted, namely :-
"(3) A

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.