LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

SWAMY DEVI DAYAL HOSPITAL & DENTAL COLLEGE versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Citation: [2013] 14 S.C.R. 105 · Decided: 27-08-2013 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN · Disposal: Disposed off

Cited by 2 judgment(s) · cites 2 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2013] 14 S.C.R. 105 
SWAMY DEVI DAYAL HOSPITAL. & DENTAL COLLEGE 
A 
v. 
THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 
(Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 25698 of 2013) 
AUGUST 27, 2013 
[K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND A.K.SIKRI, JJ.] 
B 
Education - Medical education - Dental Council of India 
Act, 1948 - s.10A - MOS (Master of Dental Surgery) -
Specialist Courses - Permission for - Renewal of permission 
C 
- Applicability of s.10A - Held: No doubt, heading of s. 10A 
suggests that it deals with "permission for establishment of 
new dental college, new courses of study, etc.''. however, it 
applies to cases of renewal of permission as well - s. 1 OA 
contemplates grant of opportunity of being heard at two stages D 
- First stage is at the level of Dental Council of India (DC/) 
after the scheme is submitted to DC/ u/s.10A(2) - Once it is 
found by the DC/ that all the parameters for granting 
permission are met, it recommends the grant of approval of 
the scheme to the Central Government - Jn case scheme is 
E 
found to be deficient, s.10A(3)(a) casts an obligation on the 
part of the DC/ to give a reasonable opportunity for making a 
written representation and also to rectify the deficiencies, if 
any, specified by the DC/ - Second stage of adherence to the 
principles of natural justice is provided at the level of Central 
F 
Government at the time when it has to take final decision, after 
the receipt of the recommendation sent by the DC/ -
This 
requirement of hearing is stipulated in proviso to s.10A(4), in 
the event the Central Government is proposing to disapprove 
the scheme -
Expression "opportunity of being heard" G 
occurring in this proviso would mean that the material that 
goes against the applicant and is to be taken into 
consideration, is, to be supplied to the applicant within an 
opportunity to make representation - For this purpose either 
105 
H 
106 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
(2013] '14 S.C.R. 
A the report of the DC/ itself can be supplied or at/east the 
deficiencies pointed out in the report have to be 
communicated by the Central Government to the applicant 
with an opportunity to furnish its comments thereupon - At that 
stage while giving its reply, if the applicant claims personal 
B hearing, such a personal heaing should also be accorded -
Natural Justice - Opportunity of hearing. 
Education - Medical education - Dental Council of India 
Act, 1948 - s.10A - MOS (Master of Dental Surgery) -
C Specialist Courses - Permission for - Renewal of permission 
- Academic session 2013-14 - Permission declined to 
Petitioner-college for renewal of the second year MOS course 
in two specialties - Justification - Held: Since no opportunity 
of being heard in terms of the requirement of proviso to sub-
section (4) of s.10A of the Act was afforded to the petitioner, 
D the decision of the Central Government rejecting the request 
of renewal warrants to be set aside on this ground alone ,-
However, notwithstanding the position in law which goes In 
favour of the petitioner, in view of the other circumstances in 
the case, no relief can be given to the petitioner as claimed 
E by it insofar academic session 2013-2014 is concerned - It 
is not possible to put the clock back - However, the case can 
be considered for renewal of permission for the next academic 
session - For this, hearing be given to the petitioner to 
demonstrate that they have overcome the deficiencies and 
F they no longer exist - If the Central Government is satisfied 
on these aspects, it may grant renewal of permission for the 
next academic session 2014-15 -
In case renewal of 
permission is rejected, the petitioner will have to undergo the 
process of seeking fresh permission for next academic 
G session i.e. 2014-15 by submitting fresh scheme/proposal to 
the DC/ for that year, as per the procedure prescribed in the 
Act & Regulations. 
The petitioner, a Dental College recognized and 
H affiliated to Respondent No.4 University, was desirous of 
SWAMY DEVI DAYAL HOSPITAL & DENTAL 
107 
COLLEGE v. UNION OF INDIA 
starting the MOS (Master of Dental Surgery) Course. 
A 
Respondent No.3-State of Haryana granted NOC to the 
petitioner for starting MOS Course in 9 specialties from 
the session 2010-11. Thereafter, Respondent No.4 -
University granted provisional affiliation to the petitioner-
college for 6 out of 9 specialties for academic session 
8 
2011-12. Respondent No.1, i.e. the Central Government 
also, on the recommendations of Respondent No.2/ 
Dental C

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.