LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

SUKHDEV SINGH & ORS. versus BHAGATRAM SARDAR SINGH RAGHUVANSHI AND ANR.

Citation: [1975] 3 S.C.R. 619 · Decided: 21-02-1975 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: A.N. RAY · Disposal: Disposed off

Cited by 36 judgment(s) · cites 3 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
B 
c 
D 
E 
F 
G 
H 
619 
SUKHDEV SINGH & ORS. 
I'. 
BHAGA TRAM SARDAR SINGH RAGHUVANSHI AND ANR; 
February 21, 1975 
[A. N. RAY, C.J., K. K. MATHEW, Y. v. CHANDRACHUD, 
A. ALAGIR!SWAMI AND A. c. GUPTA, JJ.] 
Stal1aory Corporations-Regulations made by, whether have force of law-. 
Wlwthcr employees of corporation are servants of Union or State. 
Constitution of. India. Art. 12-WJiether statutory corporations are 'State' 
or 'authority', 
The Oil and Natural Gas Com'mission, the Industrial Finance Corporation 
~nd the Life Insurance Corporation are .:reated by statutes. The Oil and 
'C.!'l·ral Gas Commission is owned by the Government, the management is by 
the Government and it could be dissolved only by the Government. The 
p1w. isions of the Oil and Natural Gas Commission Act, 1954, creatil}g it. show 
that it acts as 1an agency of the cen~ral Government. The provisions of the 
Jndu·strial Finance Corporation Act, 1948, creating the Industrial Fina,nce Corpo-
ration show that the Corporation is under the complete contl'ol and managemwt 
~f the Central Government. Provisions of the Life Insurance Act, 1956, whi:h 
creates the Life Insurance Corporation, show that this Corporation is also ari 
agency of the Government carrying on the exclusive business of Life ,Insurance. 
The Corporation is owned and managed by the Government and it can be 
dissolved only by the Government. 
All the three statutes constituting the three 
statutory corporations enabled them to male regulations which provide, il!ll'r 
a/ia, for the terms and conditions of ·employment and '3ervices of their employees. 
On the question whether, (i) the regulations have the for.:e of law, and (ii) 
whether the statu.tory corporations are 'State' within the meaning o'f Art. 12 
of the Constitution, 
HELD: (Per A. N'. Ray, CJ., Y. V. Chandrachud and A. C. Gupta, JJ.) 
The regulations have the for~-e of law and the employees arc entitled lo the 
declamtion of being in employment when their dismissal or 
removal 
is 
in 
contravention of the regulations. 
[642E-F] 
(a) Regulations under an Act are framed in exercise of a specific power 
conferred by the statute to make regulations. The 
authority 
making 
the 
regulations must specify the sources of its specific power. The essen:e of Jaw 
is that it is made by the law makers in exerci·3e of specific authority. The 
vires of such of law is capa,ble of being challenged if the power is absent or 
has been exceeded by the authority making ru.les or regulations. 
The manner 
and procedure adopted in making the regulations in the instant case, by the 
three statutory corporations, have this characteristic of law. 
[629G-A] 
(b) Another characteristic of law is its content. Law is a rule of general 
conduct while administrative instructions relate to a particular person. 
[630A] 
(c) Broadly stated the distinction between rules and regulations on one 
hand, and administrative instructions on the other, is that rules and regulations 
can be made· only after reciting the sour.:e of power whereas administrative 
instructions are not issued after reciting the sou.rce of power. There is, however, 
no substantial difference between rules and regulations inasmuch as both are 
subordinate legislation under powers conferred by the statute. A regulation 
framed under statute applies uniform treatment to everyone or to aJl members 
of some group of class. [630G; 6330] 
(d) The regulations in the present case are, inter alia, for the purpose of 
defining the duties, conduct and conditions of service of officers and other 
6 :io 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[1975] 3 S.C.R. 
employees. 
They contain the terms and conditions of aippointment which are 
imperative. The 
form 
and 
content 
of the contract with 
a 
particular 
employee is prescriptive and statutory. 
The notable feature is that these statu-
tory bodies have no free hand in framing the conditions and temis of service 
of their employees. 
They are bound to apply the terms and conditions as laid 
down in tile regulations. 
These regulaitions are not only binding on the authority 
but nl5o on the public. 
They imposed obligations on the statutory authorities. 
The statutory authorities cannot deviate from the conditions of service. 
Any 
deviation will b.t; enforced by legal sanction of courts to invalidate actions in 
violation of rules and regulations. The existence of rules and regulations u:nder 
the :itatnte is to ensure regµlar condll'Ct with a distinctive attitude

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.