STATE OF U.P. versus SANJAY KUMAR
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
[2012] 7 S.C.R. 359 STATE OF U.P. v. SANJAY KUMAR (SLP (Crl.) No. 6467 of 2012) AUGUST 21, 2012 [DR. B.S. CHAUHAN AND SWATANTER KUMAR, JJ.] PENAL CODE, 1860: A B ss. 302 and 376 - Rape and murder of an eighteen year c old girl - Death sentence - Commuted by High Court to life imprisonment - Held: High Court is correct to the extent that the facts of the case did not warrant death sentence. SENTENCE/SENTENCING: Sentencing policy - Principle of proportionality - Aggravating and mitigating circumstances - Commutation of death sentence to imprisonment for fife or imprisonment for a specified term - Clemency power of Sovereign - Expression D "life imprisonment" - Connotation of - Discussed - Constitution E of India, 1950 - Arts. 142, 72 and 161 - Separation of powers - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - s.433, 433-A. Neel Kumar @ Anil Kumar v. State of Haryana, (2012) 5 SCC 766; and Sandeep v. State of UP. (2012) 6 SCC 107; Ramraj v. State of Chhattisgarh 2009 (16) SCR 367 = AIR 2010 SC 420; Mui/a & Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2010 F (2) SCR 633 =AIR 2010 SC 942; and Rameshbhai Chandubhai Rathod v. State of Gujarat 2011 (1) SCR 829 =AIR 2011 SC 803; Swamy Shraddananda @ Murali Manohar Mishra v. State of Karnataka, 2008 (11) SCR 93 G =AIR 2008 SC 3040; His Holiness Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru v. State of Kera/a & Anr., 1973 Suppl. SCR 1 =AIR 1973 SC 1461; Smt. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Shri Raj 359 H 360 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2012] 7 S.C.R. A Narain and Anr. 1976 SCR 347 =AIR 1975 SC 2299; and State of West Bengal & Ors. v. The Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights, West Bengal and Ors. 2010 (2) SCR 979 =AIR 2010 SC 1476; Jayawant Dattatraya Suryarao v. State of Maharashtra 2001 (5) Suppl. SCR 54 = (2001) 10 B SCC 109; Manish Goel v. Rohini Goel, 2010 (2) SCR 414 = AIR 2010 SC 1099; State of Haryana v. Jagdish 2010 (3) SCR 716 = AIR 2010 SC 1690; Sevaka Perumal etc. v. State of Tamil Nadu 1991 (2) SCR 711 = AIR 1991 SC 1463; Ravji v. State of Rajasthan 1995 (6) Suppl. SCR 195 =AIR c 1996 SC 787; State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ghanshyam Singh 2003 (3) Suppl. SCR 618 = AIR 2003 SC 3191; Dhananjay Chatterjee alias Dhana v. State of WB. AIR 2004 SC 3454; Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik v. The State of Maharashtra, AIR 2012 SC 1377; and Brajendra Singh v. 0 State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 2012 SC 1552 - referred to. Exp. Grossman, (1924) 69 Led. 527 - referred to. Case Law Reference: E (2012) 5 sec 766 referred to para 5 (2012) 6 sec 101 referred to para 5 2009 (16) SCR 367 referred to para 6 2010 (2) SCR 633 referred to para 6 F 2011 (1) SCR 829 referred to para 6 2008 (11) SCR 93 referred to para 8 1973 Suppl. SCR 1 referred to para 10 G 1976 SCR 347 referred to para 10 2010 (2) SCR 979 referred to para 10 2001 (5) Suppl. SCR 54 referred to para 11 H 2010 (2) SCR 414 referred to para 12 STATE OF U.P. v. SANJAY KUMAR 361 (1924) 69 Led. 527 referred to para 13 2010 (3) SCR 716 referred to para 14 1991 (2) SCR 711 referred to para 15 1995 (6) Suppl. SCR 195 referred to para 15 2003 (3) Suppl. SCR 618 referred to para 15 2004 AIR 3454 referred to para 15 2012 AIR 1377 referred to para 15 2012 AIR 1552 referred to para 15 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 6467 of 2012. From the Judgment & Order dated 22.02.2012 of the High Court of Allahabad in Criminal Appeal (Capital Case) No. 7760 of 2009. Vivek Vishnoi, Gaurav Agarwal (for M.R. Shamshad) for the Petitioner. The order of the Court was delivered ORDER 1. Delay condoned. 2. This petition has been filed against the impugned judgment and Order dated 8.2.2012 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Appeal (Capital Case) A B c D E F No. 7760 of 2009, by which the High Court has commuted the death sentence awarded to the respondent by the Sessions G Court, in life imprisonment upon recording its conclusion that it was not among the 'rarest of rare cases', in which death penalty could be awarded. H 362 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2012] 7 S.C.R. A 3. Facts and circumstances giving rise to this petition are as follows: A. The respondent was engaged in the work of whitewash in the house of one Shyam Ji Sharma, resident of Tulsi Vihar 8 Colony, Varanasi and his very close relative Divya Rani was staying with him, as she was appearing for her Intermediate examination. The complain
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex