STATE OF U.P. & ORS. versus PAWAN KUMAR DIVEDI & ORS,
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A B (2014] 13 S.C.R. 642 STATE OF U.P. & ORS. v. PAWAN KUMAR DIVEDI & ORS, (Civil Appeal No. 3989 of 2006) SEPTEMBER 2, 2014 [R.M. LODHA, CJI, JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J. CHELAMESWAR, A. K. SIKRI AND ROHINTON FALi NARIMAN, JJ.] c Service Law - Salary - Uttar Pradesh Junior High Schools (Payment of Salaries of Teachers and Other Employees) Act, 1978-ss. 2(j) and 10-UttarPradesh Basic Education Act, 1972- Three categories of recognised Junior High Schools; (one) having Classes I to VIII, i.e., Classes I o to V (Junior Basic School) and so also Classes VI to VIII (Semior Basic School), (two) a school as above and upgraded to High School or intermediate standard and (three) Classes VI to VIII (Senior Basic School) initially with no Junior Basic School (Classes I to V) being part of the said school- Dispute E in respect of third category of the schools where Classes I to V are added after obtaining recognition to the schools which arE1 recognized and aided for imparting education in Classes VI to VIII - Entitlement of teachers of primary section Classes I to Vin such schools to benefit of s.10 of the 1978 Act - F Whether teachers of privately managed primary schools and primary sections of privately managed high schools are eligible to receive their salaries from the State Government - Held: If a Junior Basic School (Classes I to V) is added after obtaining necessary recognition to a recognized and G aided Senior Basic Sch9ql (Classes VI to Vil/), then surely such Junior Basic School becomes integral part of one school, i.e., Basic School having Classes I to VIII- Expression "Junior High School" in the 1978 Act is intended to refer to the schools imparting basic education, i.e., education up to H 642 STATE OF U.P. v. PAWAN KUMAR DIVEDI 643 VIII class - Merit in the argument that schools having Junior A Basic Schools and the Senior Basic Schools either separately or together are under the same Board, i.e., the Board of Basic Education, as per the 1972 Act- Junior High School necessarily includes Classes I to V when they are opened in a Senior Basic School (Classes VI to VIII) after B obtaining separate recognition and for which there may not be a separate order of grant-in-aid by the Government. Dismissing the appeals, the Court HELD:1. Recognised Junior High Schools can be C of three kinds: (one) having Classes I to VIII, i.e., Classes I to V (Junior Basic School) and so also Classes VI to VIII (Senior Basic School), (two) a school as above and upgraded to High School or intermediate standard and (three) Classes VI to VIII (Senior Basic School) initially D with no Junior Basic School (Classes I to V) being part of the said school. [Para 43][672-D] 2. If a Junior Basic School (Classes I to V) is added after obtaining necessary recognition to a recognized E . and aided Senior Basic School (Classes VI to VIII), then surely such Junior Basic School becomes integral part of one school, i.e., Basic School having Classes I to VIII. It is not appropriate to give narrow meaning to the expression "Junior High School". That Legislature used F the expression Junior High School and not the Basic School as used and defined in the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Act, 1972 is insignificant. This view is fortified by the fact that in Section 20) of the Uttar Pradesh Junior _High Schools (Payment of Salaries of Teachers and G Other Employees) Act, 1978, the expressions defined in the 1972 Act are incorporated. [Para 44][672-H; 673-A-D] 3. There is merit in the argument that the schools having the Junior Basic Schools and the Senior Basic H 644 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 13 S.C.R. A Schools eith.er separately or together are under the same Board, i.e., the Board of Basic Education, as per the 1972 Act. It is held, as it must be, that Junior High School nE!Cessarily includes Classes I to V when they are opened in a Senior Basic School (Classes VI to VIII) after B obtaining separate recognition and for which there may n<>t be a separate order of grant-in-aid by the Government. [Para 46][67 4-C-E] c D E F G H Vi nod Sharma and others v. Director of Education (Basic) U.P and Others (1998) 3 SCC 404 : 1998 (2) SCR 382 - affirmed. TMA Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka (2002) 8 sec 481 : 2002 (3) Suppl. scR 587; J.P Unnikrishnan v. State of AP (1993) I SCC 645 : 1993 (1) SCR 594; State of HP v. HP State Recognised High Schools Managing Committee (1995
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex