LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

STATE OF U.P. & ANOTHER versus MISS BHAVNA TIWARI & ORS.

Citation: [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2687 · Decided: 29-04-2025 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: J.B. PARDIWALA, R MAHADEVAN · Disposal: Disposed off

cites 1 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2025] 4 S.C.R. 2687 : 2025 INSC 747
State of U.P. & Another 
v. 
Miss Bhavna Tiwari & Ors.
(Special Leave Petition (C) No. 9298 of 2018)
29 April 2025
[J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Streamlining of the counselling process in NEET-PG; curbing the 
malpractice of seat blocking to ensure transparency and fairness in 
the admission process; compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- awarded 
by the High Court to the respondents for seat blocking in NEET-
PG counselling, if was justified.
Headnotes†
Education/Educational Courses – Post Graduate Medical 
Courses – Admission process – NEET PG counselling – 
Malpractice of seat blocking – Prevention of – Need for 
transparency and fairness – Directions issued to the concerned 
authorities to ensure effective implementation of the revised 
counselling framework:
Held: Implementation of a Nationally synchronized counselling 
calendar to align All India Quota (AIQ ) and State rounds and prevent 
seat blocking across systems – Pre-Counselling Fee Disclosure 
by all private/deemed universities, detailing tuition, hostel, 
caution deposit, and miscellaneous charges to be mandatory – 
Establishment of a Centralized Fee Regulation Framework under 
the National Medical Commission (NMC) – Permitting upgrade 
windows post-round 2 for admitted candidates to shift to better 
seats without reopening counselling to new entrants – Publication 
of raw scores, answer keys and normalization formulae for 
transparency in multi-shift NEET-PG exams – Enforcement of 
strict penalties for seat blocking including forfeiture of security 
deposit, disqualification from future NEET-PG exams (for repeat 
offenders), blacklisting of complicit colleges – Implementation of 
Aadhaar-based seat tracking to prevent multiple seat holdings and 
misrepresentation – State authorities and institutional DMEs to be 
held accountable under contempt or disciplinary action for rule or 
schedule violations – Uniform Counselling Conduct Code to be 
2688
[2025] 4 S.C.R.
Supreme Court Reports
adopted across all States for standard rules on eligibility, mop-up 
rounds, seat withdrawal, and grievance timelines – A third-party 
oversight mechanism to be set up under NMC for annual audits 
of counselling data, compliance, and admission fairness. [Para 16]
Education/Educational Courses – Post Graduate medical 
courses – Admission process – NEET PG counselling – 
Respondent Nos.1, 2 (aspirants in the first NEET-PG) filed 
writ petitions alleging large-scale seat blocking, stating that 
nearly 80% of the seats were filled during the mop-up round 
resulting in the seats of their first preference being eventually 
allotted to less meritorious candidates – High Court issued 
specific directions to the Government authorities and also 
directed payment of compensation to the Respondents for 
seat blocking – Challenge to:
Held: Various reforms introduced by the authorities address 
the concerns raised by the High Court in the impugned order 
ensuring that meritorious students are not deprived of their 
rightful opportunities, impugned order not interfered with in 
entirety – Directions issued by this Court to ensure the effective 
implementation of the revised counselling framework upholding 
the principles of merit, fairness and transparency – However, on 
facts, no valuable right was denied to the respondents regarding 
participation in the mop-up round and once admission was granted, 
the process concluded unless specific exceptions applied as per 
the admission guidelines – Award of Rs.10,00,000/- each as 
compensation is arbitrary and excessive – Rs.1,00,000/- awarded 
each to Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – Impugned order modified. 
[Paras 14.4, 15.3, 15.4]
Education/Educational Courses – Post Graduate Medical 
Courses – Admission process – NEET PG counselling – 
Malpractice of seat blocking – Discussed. [Paras 7, 8] 
Case Law Cited
Sharwan Kumar v. DGHS and Others (1993) 3 SCC 332; Ashish 
Ranjan v. Union of India (2016) 11 SCC 225; Modern Dental 
College and Research Centre v. State of Madhya Pradesh [2016] 
3 SCR 579 : (2016) 7 SCC 353; Christian Medical College Vellore 
Association v. Medical Council of India, Order of Supreme Court 
dated 03.05.2017 in WP(C) No. 261 of 2017; Education Promotion 
[2025] 4 S.C.R. 
2689
State of U.P. & Another v. Miss Bhavna Tiwari & Ors.
Society of India v. Union of India, Order of Supreme Court dated 
04.05.2017 in WP(C) No. 244 of 2017; Nihila P.P. v. the Medical 
Counselling

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.