LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

STATE OF TAMIL NADU versus STATE OF KERALA & ANR.

Citation: [2014] 12 S.C.R. 875 · Decided: 07-05-2014 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: RAJENDRA MAL LODHA · Disposal: Decided Case

Cited by 15 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2014] 12 S.C.R. 875 
STATE OF TAMIL NADU 
v. 
STATE OF KERALA & ANR. 
(Original Suit No. 3 of 2006) 
MAY 07, 2014 
[R.M. LOOHA, CJI, H.L. DATTU, CHANDRAMAULI KR. 
P~SAD, MADAN . B. LOKUR AND M.Y. EQBAL, JJ.) 
A 
B 
Constitution of India, 1950 - Art. 131- Inter-State water 
dispute - Mullaperiyar dam, a masonry dam, constructed C 
across Periyar river pursuant to lease agreement dated 29-
10-1886 executed between Government of the Maharaja of 
Travancore and the Secretary of Sta"te for India - On coming 
into force of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, State of 
Travancore-Cochin was formed and State of Kera/a is its' D 
successor-in-interest - State of Tamil Nadu is successor-in-
interest of the Governor in Council, Secretary of State for India 
- Dam situated at Thekkady District in Kera/a but owned and 
operated by the Government of Tamil Nadu - In an earlier 
round of litigation, vide judgment dated 27-2-2006, Supreme 
E 
Court permitted water level in the Mullaperiyar dam to be 
raised. up to 142 ft and also restrained the State of Kera/a and 
its officers from causing any obstruction the(eto - However, 
vide subsequent enactment of the 2006 Amendment Act by 
the Kera/a State Legislature, Full Reservoir Level (FRL) of the 
F 
dam fixed and limited to136 ft - Suit filed by State of Tamil 
Nadu u/Art. 131 of the Constitution against the State of Kera/a 
-
Maintainability_ of suit u/.Art. 131 -
Validity and binding 
nature of 1886 L;ease Agreement and the effect of 1970 
supplemental agreements - Held: Suit filed by State of Tamil 
Nadu was maintainable u/Art. 131 of the Constitution - The suit G 
was based on a legal right claimed under the lease deed 
dated 29-10-1886- State of Kera/a (first defendant) estopped 
from raising plea that lease deed dated 29-10-1886 had 
875 
H 
876 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2014] 12 S.C.R: 
A 
lapsed, in view of supplemental agreements dated 28-05-
1970 between State of Kera/a and State of Tamil Nadu -
Lease deed dated 29-10-1886 valid and binding on the first 
defendant (State of Kera/a) andΒ· enforceable against it -
Kera/a Irrigation and Water Conservation Act, 2003 - Kera/a 
B Irrigation and Water Conservation (Amendment) Act, 2006. 
Constitution of India, 1950 - Art.131 - Inter-State water 
dispute - Mullaperiyar dam, a masonry dam, constructed 
across Periyar river - Dam situated at Thekkady District in 
Kera/a but owned and operated by the Government of Tamil 
C Nadu - In an earlier round of litigation, vide judgment dated 
27-2-2006, .Supreme Court permitted water level in the 
Mullaperiyar dam to be raised up toΒ· 142 ft and also restrained 
the State of Kera/a and its officers from causing any 
obstruction thereto - However, vide subsequent enactment of 
D the 2006 Amendment Act by the Kera/a State Legislature, Full 
Reservoir Level (FRL) of the dam fixed and limited to136 ft -
Suit filed by State of Tamil Nadu u/Art. 131 of the Constitution 
against the State .of Kera/<J - Whether 2006 Amendment Act 
unconstitutional and ultra Vires, in its application to and effect 
E on the Mullai Periyar Dam and whether judgment dated 27-
2-2006 operated as res judicata, in respect of all or any of the 
\(.. 
defences set up by the first defendant (State of Kera/a) - Held: 
2006 Amendment Act was unconstitutional and ultra vires in 
its application to and effect on the Mullaperiyar dam - Rights 
F of Tamil Nadu, crystallized in judgment dated 27-2-2006 
could not be nullified by a legislation made by the Kera/a 
State legislature - Earlier judgment given on 27-2-2006 
operated as res judicata on issue of the safety of Mullaperiyar 
dam for raising water level to 142 ft. - Kera/a estopped from 
G raising or re-agitating issues in' the present suit - Kera/a 
cannot obstruct Tamil Nadu from increasing the water level 
of Mullaperiyar dam to 142 ft. and from carrying out repair 
works as per judgment dated 27-2-2006 - Kera/a Irrigation 
and Wafer Conservation Act, 2003 - Kera/a Irrigation and 
H Water Conservation (Amendment) Act, 2006 - Do.ctrinesl 
STATE OF TAMIL NADU v. STATE OF KERALA 
877 
Principles - Principle of res judicata and constructive res A 
judicata - Applicability of. 
Β· Constitution of India, 1950 - Art.131 - Inter-State water 
dispute - Mullaperiyar dam, a masonry dam, constructed 
across Periyar river - Dam situated at Thekkady District in 8 
Kera/a but owned and operated by the Government of Tamil 
Nadu - In an earlier round of litigation, vide judgment dated 
27-2-2006

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.