STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS versus DR. HAMIR SINGH CHOUHAN (DEAD) BY LRS & ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A B C D E F G H 118 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 4 S.C.R. [2023] 4 S.C.R. 118 118 STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. v. DR. HAMIR SINGH CHOUHAN (DEAD) BY LRS & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 5392 of 2017) APRIL 28, 2023 [M. R. SHAH AND C. T. RAVIKUMAR, JJ.] Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 β r.18 β Termination of lien β Respondents were initially appointed in the Animal Husbandry Department of the State of Rajasthan β Subsequently, all of them applied for appointment in the Rajasthan State Dairy Development Corporation Ltd. and were appointed in the respective Milk Unions under the Dairy Federations β Lien of the respective respondents was terminated w.e.f. the date on which they were absorbed/made permanent in the Dairy Federations β All of them retired as employees of the Dairy Federations β However, later, the respondents claimed pensionary benefits from the State Government treating their lien to be continuing with the State β Allowed by High Court β Sustainability of β Held: Not sustainable β There cannot be two liens on two substantive posts β Even as per r.18 of the 1951, Rules which provides for termination of lien, a Government servantβs lien on a post stood terminated on his acquiring a lien on a permanent post outside the cadre on which he is borne β Thus, once the respondents were permanently absorbed and became an employee of the Dairy Development Corporation/Milk Federation Unions, they ceased to have the lien with the State Government β Therefore, they shall not be entitled to the pensionary benefits as State Government employees and that too after having received the retirement benefits from the Dairy Development Corporation / Milk Federation Unions β Judgment and order passed by the Single Judge and the Division Bench quashed and set aside β Service Law. State of Rajasthan and Anr. vs. S.N. Tiwari and Ors., (2009) 4 SCC 700 β referred to. Case Law Reference (2009) 4 SCC 700 referred to Para 4.3 A B C D E F G H 119 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 5392 of 2017. From the Judgment and Order dated 09.02.2015 of the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur in DBCSA No. 50 of 2015. With Civil Appeal Nos. 5393, 5391 and 5394 of 2017. Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv., Ms. Shubhangi Agarwal, Arpit Parkash, Sandeep Kumar Jha, Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Advs. for the Appellants. Uday Gupta, Ms. Shivani M. Lal, Ms. Sanam Singh, S. S. Sisodia, M. K. Tripathi, Harish Dasan, Rajiv Ranjan, Rajeev Kumar Gupta, Hiren Dasan, Ms. Charu Mathur, Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur in D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writs) No. 50 of 2015 and other allied appeals by which the Division Bench of the High Court has dismissed the said division appeals preferred by the appellant herein β State of Rajasthan, which were filed against the common judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge declaring the respondents herein to be entitled to receive pensionary benefits in essence by treating their lien to be continuing with the State Government upto the date of their permanent absorption with the Rajasthan Co-operative Dairy Federations (hereinafter referred to as βDairy Federationsβ), the State of Rajasthan has preferred the present appeals. 2. That the respondents herein were initially appointed in the Animal Husbandry Department either as Animal Husbandry Extension Officer or Veterinary Assistant Surgeon in the year 1971. That all of them were subsequently selected after following the due selection process between 1976 to 1978 in the Dairy Federations. That as per the relevant G.O. and the relevant Rules, the respondents continued to have the lien with the parent department / State Government. That the names of the respondents appeared in the seniority list of the Dairy Federations and all of them were promoted in the year 1983 or 1989 in the Dairy STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. v. DR. HAMIR SINGH CHOUHAN (DEAD) BY LRS & ORS. A B C D E F G H 120 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 4 S.C.R. Federations. All of them retired as employees of the Dairy Federations between 1999 to 2003. All of them received the retirement benefits from the Dairy Federations. 2.1 Thereafter, after a period of approximately six to nine years, from the date of superannuation from the Dairy Federations and after receiving all the retirement benefits from the Dairy Federations, t
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex