STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR. versus GOPALDAS ETC. ETC.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR. v. GOPALDAS ETC. ETC. JANUARY 13, 1995 B [KULDIP SINGH AND B.L. HANSARIA, JJ.) Service Law-Rajasthan Civil Servants (Revised Pay Scales) Rules, . +--> 1983-Revision of Pay-scale of Upper Division Clerks-Demand of UDCs of subordinate officesΒ· for grant of higher pay scale given to UDCs of C Secretariat-Allowed by notification dated Jan. 23, 1985-Claim of revised scale w.e.f. J.9.1981 relying on various notifications relating to other depart- me~ts-Notifications relied upon issued under different circumstances-Plea of discrim~nation-Not maintainable. D The pay-scales of Government servants in the State of Rajasthan were revised w.e.f. 1.9.1981 by the Rajasthan Civil Servants (Revised Pay Scales) Rules, 1983. The pay scale of UDCs of subordinate offices was revised from Rs. 385-650 to Rs. 520-925. The existing pay scale of Rs. 440-775 of UDCs of Secretariat was revised to that of Rs. 610-1090. The UDCs of subordinate offices claimed that there was no justification for E denying them the higher pay scale which was being given to the UDCs of Secretariat. The State Government allowed the claim and granted revision by the notification dated January 23, 1985 w.e.f. 1.2.1985. The respondent, working as UDC in subordinate office filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the State Government to grant him the revised pay scale w.e.f. F 1.9.1981 instead of from 1.2.1985. It was alleged that after coming into force of the Rajasthan Civil Servants (Revised Pay Scales) Rules, 1983 various notifications were issued from time to time during the years 1984 - 85 revising pay scales of different cadres in other departments of the State Government whereunder the revision was made operative w.e.f. 1-9-1981. G It was contended that the respondent and other UDCs of subordinate offices were dealt with discriminately as they were granted revision w.e.f. 1Β·2-1985 instead of from 1.9.1981, The High Court allowed the writ petition solely on the ground of discrimination. Hence this appeal. The appellants contended that the High Court fell in error in accept- H ing the plea of discrimination for which there was no factual basis. It was 214 STATEv. GOP ALDAS [KULDIP SINGH,J.] 215 submitted that the notifications relied upon by the High Court were issued A under different circumstances and were not relevant to the facts of the present case. According to the appellants those were the cases where certain categories of employees were not included in the general pay revision provided under the rules, and therefore, they were given the revised pay-scales for the first time w.e.f. 1-9-1981 to bring them at par B with the employees who were governed by the Rules. While in the present case, the UDCs of suhordinate offices were governed by the Rules and they were given the revised pay scale to bring them at par with the UDCs of the Secretariat. Allowing the appeal, this Court HELD : The employees dealt with by the fourteen notifications relied upon by the High Court were those who were left out of the pay-revision and in respect of whom no provision was made under the Rajasthan Civil Servants (Revised Pay Scales) Rules, 1983. These notifications were issued c to deal with the omissions which came to the notice of the Government D after the initial process of pay revision. So far as the notification dated 23.2.1985 relating to the UDCs of subordinate offices was concerned, it was not with a view to remove any anomaly or to make any provision for a category which was left out of the Rules. It was a notification issued as a result of the acceptance of the demand of the UDCs of the subordinate E offices for grant of higher pay scales which was given to their counter parts in the Secretariat. The State Government was justified in granting revised pay scale to the respondent and other UDCs of subordinate offices w.e.f. 1.2.1985. [218-F-H, 219-A] CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 3528 of F 1991 etc. From the Judgment and Order dated 21.12.88 of the Rajasthan High Court in D.B.C.W.P. No. 3116 of 1987. A. Gupta for the Appellants. Badridas Sharma and Narottam Vyas, for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by G KULDIP SINGH, J. The pay-scales of Government servants in the H 216 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1995) 1 S.C.R. A State of Rajasthan were revised with effect from September 1, 1981 by the Rajasthan Civil Servants (Revised
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex