STATE OF PUNJAB versus IQBAL SINGH AND ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A
STATE OF PUNJAB..
v.
IQBAL SINGH AND ORS.
MAY 10, 1991
B
[A.M. AHMADI, V. RAMASWAMI AND K. RAMASWAMY, JJ.)
c
D
E
Indian Penal Code,
1860-Sections 107,
108-'Abetment'
Abettor'-Definition of.
Words and Phrases-"Jnstigate", "aid"-Meaning of.
Indian Evidence Act, 1872-Sections 113-A and 113-B-Dowry
death-Presumption-Legislative intention of-Duty of Court indicated.
lndian Penal Code, 1860-Sections 107-120, 302, 304-B, 306 and
498-A-Married woman, subjected to cruelty or harassment-Death-
Presumption of-Punishment of persons responsible.
Respondent No. l's wife setting herself and her three children
ablaze, died at her husband's house on 7.6.1983. The marriage had
taken place seven or eight years before the incident. The deceased wife
was working as a teacher while her husband was a clerk.
Soon after the marriage there were disputes between them on the
question of dowry. The demand for extra dowry strained the relations
between them and the husband began to ill-treat the deceased wife.
The deceased had written a letter to the Deputy Superintendent of
F
Police on 12.10.1977 complaining about the ill-treatment meted out to
her and apprehending danger to her life and the lives of her children.
When the police came to inquire into the matter there was some under~
standing, as a result of which she had informed the police that no
further action be taken for the present but her application may be kept
pending. Later, a divorce deed was executed but not acted upon. The
G
situation did not improve.
On 7 .6.1983, the very morning of incident, the deceased wife
wrote a letter addressed to Deputy Commissioner of Police, wherein she
narrated how she and her children were ill-treated by her husband,
mother-in-law and sister-in-law for dowry and why she took the deciΒ·
H
sion to put an end to her life and the lives of her children. Another letter
790
-.,.
l
STATE OF PUNJAB v. IQBAL SINGH
791
of e_ven date was addre~d to her mother stating the reasons for her
such act.
A First Information Report was lodged against the Respondent
No. 1 by the mother of the deceased. After investigation the Respondent
No. 1, his mother and sister were put up for trial. The Trial Court on an
examination of the prosecution evidence convicted all the three accused
persons under Section 306, IPC and sentenced the husband to rigorous
imprisonment for seven years and a fine of Rs.5,000, in default, rigor-
ous imprisonment for one year and sentenced the two others to rigorous
imprisonment for three years and a fine of Rs.I,000 each, in default,
rigorous imprisonment for three months, against which order' accused
persons preferred an appeal before the High Court.
The High Court on a reappreciation of the evidence and having
regard to the language of Section 306, IPC came to tht conclusion that
there was no evidence to show that any of the accused was guilty of
abetment and allowed the appeal.
The State has, therefore, approached this Court by way of special
leave. In the meantime the Respondent No. 1 's mother had passed away.
The appeal was, therefore, limited to the Respondent No. 1 and his
sister.
A
B
c
D
Allowing the appeal, this Court,
E
HELD: 1. 'Abetment' as defined by Section 107 comprises (i)
instigation to do that thing which is an offence, (ii) engaging in any
conspiracy fot" the doing of that thing and (iii) intentionally aiding by
any act or illegal omission the doing of that thing. An abettor is a person
who abets an offence or who abets either the commission of an offence
F
or the commission of an act which would be an offence. [798C-DJ
2. The word 'instigate' in the literary sense means to incite, set or
urge on, stir up, goad, foment, stimulate, provoke, etc. The dictionary
meaning of the word, "aid" is to give assistance, help, etc. {7980-E)
3. Where the death of a woman is caused by burns or bodily
injury or occurs otherwise than under normal circumstances within
seven years of her marriage and evidence reveals that soon before her
death she was subjected to cruelty or harassment by her husband or any
G
of bis relative for or in connection with any demand for dowry, such
death is described as dowry death under Section 304 B for which the
H
A
B
c
792
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
[1991] 2 S.C.R.
punishment extends to imprisonment for life. but not Jess than impri-
sonment for seven years. By Section J 138, Evidence Act, the court.has to
raise a presumptionExcerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex