LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS. ETC. versus NIRANJAN NA YAK AND ANR. ETC.

Citation: [1997] 3 S.C.R. 897 · Decided: 21-04-1997 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: K. RAMASWAMY, D.P. WADHWA · Disposal: Leave Granted & Allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS. ETC. 
A 
v. 
NIRANJAN NA YAK AND ANR. ETC. 
APRIL 21, 1997 
[K. RAMASWAMY AND D.P. WADHWA, JJ.) 
B 
Service Law : 
Qualification-Acquiring of-Cut off date fixed for entitlement to addi-
tional amount on acquiring qualification-Held, valid-Writ petitions pend-
C 
ing-High Court to decide the matter on the basis of relevant rules. 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 3179 of 
1997 Etc. 
From the Judgment and Order dated 19.4.95 of the Orissa High D 
Court in O.J.C. No. 1196 of 1994. 
Jana Kalyan Das and S. Misra for (P.N. Misra) for the Appellants. 
A. Mariarputham, Mohan Kr. Mohanty, Aruna Mathur and Jaya 
Salva for the Respondents. 
E 
The following Order of the Court was delivered : 
Leave granted. 
We have learned counsel on both sides. 
These appeals by special leave arise from the judgment of the Orissa 
High Court, made on April 19, 1995 in O.J.C. No. 1196of1994 and batch. 
F 
The Government has prescribed April 1, 1981 as the cut off date for 
acquisition of the qualific;ation and those who have acquired the qualifica-
G 
tions prior to that date are entitled to the additional amounts as prescribed 
under the Rules. The High Court has allowed writ petitions without 
reference to the relevant Rules. It is settled law that the cut off date has 
to be valid and bears reasonable relationship to the object sought to be 
achieved. 
H 
897 
898 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[1997] 3 S.C.R. 
A 
It is stated that the teachers are relying upon Rule 9 of 1974 Rules. 
We are informed that several writ petitions are pending in the High Court 
on the basis of Rule 9. In that view of this matter, it may be desirable that 
all these matters be decided by the High Court. 
Taking an over all view of all the facts, the appeals are allowed. The 
B judgment of the High Court stands set aside. The High Court is at liberty 
to consider the matter afresh. Learned counsel for the respondents states 
that orders were implemented subject to the result of the appeals. Im-
plementation of the order docs not stand on the way of the High Court is 
have the matters examined. No costs. 
c G.N. 
Appeals allowed. 
I,