LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. versus NANDLAL JAISWAL & ORS.

Citation: [1987] 1 S.C.R. 1 · Decided: 24-10-1986 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: P.N. BHAGWATI · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Cited by 17 judgment(s) · cites 4 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

-
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. 
v. 
NANDLAL JAISWAL & ORS. 
OCTOBER 2~, 1986 
[P.'I. BHAGWATI C.J.l. AND. V. KHALID, JJ.) 
Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 19I5, sections 13, 14 and 62(2)(h) 
read with Rule XXll of the Madhya Pradesh Excise Rules and Rules Ill 
to V of Distillery Warehouse Rules. Scope of-Disposal of licences of 
manufacture or sale of intoxicants-Whether it was obligatory on the 
part of the competent authority to adopt the "tender method" failing 
which the "auction'', failing which again by fixed licence fee method 
- .and so on as prescribed in Ruic XXJf. 
Licences-Grant of D-2 licences as per the policy decision of the 
Government of Madhya Pradesh-Whether the licence granted create a 
monopoly in favour of the licencees. 
Policy decision of the State to privitise the liquor distilleries after 
careful consideration of all the facts emanating from the application of 
the Madhya Pradesh Distilleries Association-Whether the High Court 
could bifurcate it into two and strike down one part of the policy as bad. 
"Industries (De;•elopment and Regulation) Act, 1951, Section 11-
. Whether non-obtaining a licence from the Central Government disen-
titled the setting up distilleries·-Such a plea not taken in the High 
Court-Supreme Court will not cor1$ider a new plea in an appeal under 
Article I 36 of the Constitution. 
Constitution of India, I950, Article 14--Applicabi/ity a/-
Whether will apply to grant of liquor licences. 
Laches in filing writ petition after the implementation of the policy 
decision dated 30.I2.84--Seven licences acted upon and spent at least I 
to 5 crores and altered their position-Whether a writ could be granted. 
Practice and Procedure-Judgment writing,Objectionable re-
marks should be avoided-If any, be expunged. 
A 
B 
c 
D 
E 
F 
G 
Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915 regulates the manufacture, sale 
H 
and possession of intoxicating Uquor in the State of Madhya Prad .... 
2 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[1987] 1 S.C.R. 
A Section 14 deals with the establishment or licensing of distilleries and 
warehouses. The State Government has, in exercise of the power con-
ferre under section 62, made several sets of Rules. Rule II of the Rules 
of General Application made inter alia under sub-section 2(h) of section 
62 lays down "live years" as the maximum period for which wholesale 
licences for the manufacture supply and sale of liquor could be granted 
B Rule XXII provides .for the manner in which licences for the manu-
facture or sale of intoxicants shall be disposed. 
There were at all material times in the State of Madhya Pradesh 
nine distilleries for the man11facture of spirit which were established 
long back by the State Government under a licence issued by the E'xcise 
C Commissioner. These nine distilleries were located at Gwalior, Ujjain, 
Dhar Badwaha, Chhatisgarh, Bhopal, Seoni, Nowgaon (owned by pri-
vate individuals always) and Ratlam (owned by the Government). So 
far as the first seven distilleries are concerned, the land and buildings in 
which they were housed belonged to the State Government and origi-
nally the plant and mach'.nery also belonged to the State Government 
D but in course of time successive holders of the D-2 licences in respect of 
these distilleries replaced the .Plant and machinery. The practice fol-
lowed by the Excise Department in regard to the working of these 
distilleries was to invite tenders for the wholesale supply of country 
liquor from these distilleries and the tenderers were requested to quote 
their rates for the wholesale supply of country liquor to the State 
i: Government. Normally the lowest tenders were accepted but at times 
the State Government used to accept even higher tenders taking various 
relevant factors into account. The State of Madhya Pradesh was de-
vided in· several areas and a particular area was attached to each distil-
lery for the wholesale supply of cuuntry liquor in that area. The person 
whose tender was accepted for any particular distillery was given a D-2 
F 
licence for working the distillery and also a D-1 licence for wholesale 
supply of country liquor manufactured in that distillery to retail ven-
dors in the area attached to the distillery. These licences in Forms D·l 
and D-2 were ordinarily issued for a ~ri~ of five years. Respondent 
Nos. 5 to l I in the writ petition.of Nandlal Jaiswal were the holders of 
D-1 and D-2 licences in respect of these distilleries for the period ending 
G 
31st March, 1986. The

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.