LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR. versus RAKESH MENON AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

Citation: [1995] 1 S.C.R. 745 · Decided: 01-02-1995 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: A.M. AHMADI · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

..._, ----
.I 
~ 
' 
,T 
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR. 
v 
RAKESH MENON AND ANR. ETC. ETC. 
FEBRUARY 1, 1995 
(AM. AHMADI, CJ, N.P. SINGH AND SUJATA V. MANOHAR, JJ.) 
Education-Admission Β·to professional caurses-Medical and Dental 
Colleges-State Government entitled to reduce the minimum qualifying marks 
in General English in order to make seats avaflable to SC/ST candidates. 
A Division Bench of the High Court disposed of a group of WritΒ· 
Petitions concluding that it was not open to the State government to reduce 
the minimum qualifying marks in General English in order to make seats 
available for SC/ST candidates by virtue of the relaxation . 
Different appeals which bad challenged the order had been allowed 
and the impugned order was set aside. 
Allowing the appeal, this Court 
HELD : The order of High Court is set aside in terms of another 
Supreme Court order covering the same subject. [746-D] 
Rajesh Kumar Verma v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors.,Civil 
Appeal Nos. 623-624 of1994 and State of M.P. andAnr. v. Chitresh Kasliwal 
and Anr., Civil Appeal No. 625 of 1994, applied. 
A 
B 
c 
D 
E 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 1256 of F 
1995 Etc. Etc. 
Β· ---
From the Judgment and O~der dated 21.8.93 ~f the Madhya Pradesh 
High Court in M.P. No. 1(~5 of 1992. 
S.K. Agnihotri for t~ Appellants. 
Ashok Kumar Sharma for the Respondents. 
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by 
N.P. SINGH, J. Leave granted. 
745 
G 
H 
746 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[1995] 1 S.C.R. 
A 
A group of Writ Petitions were disposed of by a Division Bench of 
the Madhya Pradesh High Court on 21.8.1993, which related to admission 
to the Medical and Dental Colleges in the said State. The Division Bench 
came to the conclusion that it was not open to the State Government to 
reduce the minimum qualifying marks in general English in order to make 
B seats available to SC/ST candidates by virtue of the said relaxation. 
Some Special Leave Petitions filed against the same judgment in the 
connected writ petitions, (Civil Appeal Nos. 623-624of1994, Rajesh Kumar 
Venna v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors., Civil Appeal No. 625 of 1994, 
State of M.P. & Anr. v. Chitresh Kasliwal & Anr., were disposed of by this 
C Court on 21.1. 1994. This Court allowed the aforesaid Civil Appeals and 
set aside the impugned order dated 21.8.1993 of the Division Bench of the 
High Court. 
These CivilAppeals have been filed on behalf of the State of Madhya 
Pradesh, against similar orders passed by the Division Bench in different 
D Writ Petitions filed on behalf of the respondents. All the appeals are 
--disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 21.1.1994 of this Court. The 
appeals filed on behalf of the State of Madhya Pradesh are allowed and 
the orders passed by the High Court are set aside. There will be no order 
for costs. 
A.G. 
Appeal Allowed.