LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

STATE OF KERALA versus M.M. ABDUL KHADER

Citation: [1995] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 784 · Decided: 15-12-1995 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: K. RAMASWAMY, B.L. HANSARIA · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
STATE OF KERALA 
v. 
M.M. ABDUL KHADER 
DECEMBER 15, 1995 
B 
[K. RAMASWAMY AND B.L. HANSARIA, JJ.] 
Land Acquisition Act, 1894. 
S. 23(1-Aj-Award of Collector being dated 21.4.1980-Claimants nor 
C entitled ro benefits under the section. 
The State Government filed appeal against the jndgment of the High 
Court allowing the claimants, the benefits of s. 23(1-A) of Land Acquisition 
Act, 1894. 
D 
Allowing the appeal, this Court 
HELD : Since the award of the Collector is of April, 21, 1980, the 
claimants are not entitled to the additional amount under s. 23 (lยทA) of 
the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. [785-C] 
E 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 12120 of 
1995. 
From the Judgment and Order dated 28.1.93 of the Kerala High 
Court in L.A.A. No. 244 of 1988. 
F 
M.T. George for the Appellants. 
N. Sudahakaran for the Respondents. 
The following Order of the Court was delivered : 
G 
Leave granted. 
The only controversy is as regards the entitlement of the respondents 
to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition 
Act, 1894. Since the award of the Collector is of June 4, 1979, the claimants 
are not entitled to the additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the said 
H Act. 
784 
STATEv. M.M.ABDULKHADER 
785 
The appeal is accordingly allowed to the above extent. The Order of A 
the High Court is set aside. No costs. 
CA. No. 12121 of 1995 
Leave granted. 
The only controversy with which we are concerned in this appeal is 
as regards the entitlement of the respondents to the additional amount 
under Section 23(1-A) of the Land Acquisition Ac~ 1894. Since the award 
of the Collector is of April 21, 1980, the claimants are not entitled to the 
additional amount under Section 23(1-A) of the said Act. 
The appeal is accordingly allowed to the above extent. The order of 
the High Court is set aside. No costs. 
R.P. 
Appeals allowed. 
B 
c