STATE OF KERALA versus ABDUL ALI
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
[2013] 5 S.C.R. 799 STATE OF KERALA v. ABDUL ALI (Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 13802 of 2006 etc.) APRIL 10, 2013 [G.S. SINGHVI AND KURIAN JOSEPH, JJ.] Kera/a Preservation of Trees Act, 1986 - ss.2(e), 4 and A B 5 - Notification u/s.5 providing total prohibition of cutting of trees - Plea that the forest in question, being not a 'Private C Forest' within meaning of s.2(f)(1)(i) of Kera/a Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971, could not be brought under purview of the Notification uls.5 of Preservation of Trees Act- Held: Explanation II u/s.5 of Preservation of Trees Act is a piece of legislation by reference - Therefore, the definition D of 'Private Forest' under the Vesting and Assignment Act is to be taken for 'Private Forest' u/s,5 of the Preservation of Trees Act - The forest in question were covered by Madras Preservation of Private Forests Act, 1949 - Since the definition of 'Private Forest' u/s.2(f)(1)(i) excludes the forests E on which Madras Preservation of Private Forests Act was applicable, the forest in question would not be covered u/ s.2(f)(1)(i) of Vesting and Assignment Act and consequently would also not be covered under the provisions of Preservation of Trees Act - Hence cannot be notified u/s.5 F of Preservation of Trees Act - However, the trees specified uls.2(e) of Preservation of Forest Act would not fall outside the purview of s.4, whereby no tree or its branch would be cut without previous permission (in writing), of the authorized officer - Kera/a Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) G Act, 1971 - s.2(f)(1)(i) - Madras Preservation of Private Forests Act, 1949. 799 H A B 800 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2013) 5 S.C.R. T.N. Godavarman Thirumulkpad vs. Union of India and Ors. (1997) 2 SCC 267: 1996 (9) Suppl. SCR 982 - referred to. Case Law Reference: ยท 1996 (9) Suppl. SCR 982 referred to Para 25 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 13802 of 2006. C From the Judgment & Order dated 31.03.2006 of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in OP No. 3252 of 2003. WITH D SLP (C) No. 1380 of 2007. SLP (C) No. 26236 of 2008. K. Padmanabhan Nair, Mohan Kumar B.R. Subramonium Prasad, Siddhartha Dave, A Raghunath, B.V. Deepak for the E appearing parties. The Order of the Court was delivered KURIAN, J. 1. Whether the land which is not a private forest as defined under The Kerala Private Forests (Vesting F and Assignment) Act, 1971 can be brought under the teeth of The Kerala Preservation of Trees Act, 1986, is the moot question arising for consideration in these cases. 2. The Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) G Act, 1971 (hereafter referred to as 'the Vesting and Assignment Act') was enacted to provide for the vesting in the Government of private forests in the State of Kerala and for the assignment thereof to agriculturists and agricultural labourers for cultivation. It is stated in the preamble that private forests in the State of H STATE OF KERALA v. ABDUL ALI 801 [KURIAN, J.] Kerala are agricultural lands and that the Government wanted A to utilize such agricultural lands so as to increase agricultural production and promote welfare of the agricultural production in the State. It may be noted that private forests were exempted from the purview of The Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, in the matter of ceiling. B 3. 'Private forest' has been defined under Section 2(f) of the Vesting and Assignment Act. The provision reads as follows: "2(f) "private forest" means (1) in relation to the .Malabar district referred to in sub- section (2) of Section 5 of the State Reorganization Act, 1956 (Central Act 37 of 1956)- c D (i} any land which the Madras Preservation of Private Forest Act. 1949 (Madras Act XXVll of 1949), applied immediately before the appointed day excluding- (A} lands which are gardens or nilams as defined in the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (1 of 1964). E (B} lands which are used principally for the cultivation of tea. coffee. cocoa. rubber. cardamom or cinnamon and lands used for any purpose ancillary to the cultivation of such crops or for the F preparation of the same for the market. Explanation:- Lands used for the construction of office buildings, godowns, factories, quarters for workmen, hospitals, schools and playgrounds shall be deemed to be lands used purposes ancillary to G the cultivation of such crops; (C} lands which ar
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex