LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

STATE OF KERALA AND ANR versus CHANDRAMOHANAN

Citation: [2004] 1 S.C.R. 1155 · Decided: 28-01-2004 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: V.N. KHARE, S.B. SINHA, S.H. KAPADIA · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Cited by 1 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

STATE OF KERALA AND ANR 
v. 
CHANDRAMOHANAN 
JANUARY 28, 2004 
[ V.N.KHARE, CJ., S.B. SINHA AND S.H. KARADIA, JJ ] 
ᱠᱮᱨᱚᱲ ᱯᱚᱱᱚᱛ ᱟᱨ ᱮᱴᱟᱜᱠᱚ ᱾ 
ᱵᱚᱱᱟᱢ 
ᱪᱚᱱᱫᱨᱚᱢᱳᱦᱟᱱᱚᱱ ᱾ 
28 ᱡᱟᱱᱩᱭᱟᱨᱤ, 2004 ᱾ 
[ᱵᱷᱤ ᱮᱱ ᱠᱷᱟᱨᱮ, ᱥᱤ ᱡᱮ, ᱮᱥ ᱵᱤ ᱥᱤᱱᱦᱟ ᱟᱨ ᱮᱥᱹ ᱮᱪ ᱠᱟᱯᱟᱰᱤᱭᱟ, ᱡᱮ ᱡᱮ ᱾] 
ᱛᱟᱹᱞᱤᱠᱟ ᱨᱮ ᱥᱮᱞᱮᱫ ᱟᱠᱟᱱ ᱦᱚᱲ ᱟᱨ ᱛᱟᱹᱞᱤᱠᱟ ᱨᱮ ᱥᱮᱞᱮᱫ ᱟᱠᱟᱱ 
ᱩᱯᱚᱡᱟᱛᱤ ᱠᱚ ᱞᱟᱹᱜᱤᱫ (ᱱᱟᱦᱟᱪᱟᱨ ᱫᱩᱜ ᱫᱟᱨᱟᱢ) ᱟᱹᱱ, 1989 ᱾ 
ᱮᱥ ᱮᱥᱼ3 (1) ᱟᱨ (xi) ᱼ ᱛᱟᱹᱞᱤᱠᱟ ᱚᱱᱩᱥᱩᱪᱤᱛ ᱡᱚᱱᱚᱡᱟᱹᱛᱤᱼ 
ᱵᱚᱱᱚᱫᱚᱞ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱮᱥᱮᱨᱼ ᱛᱟᱹᱞᱤᱠᱟ ᱚᱱᱩᱥᱩᱪᱤᱛ ᱡᱚᱱᱚᱡᱟᱹᱛᱤ ᱨᱤᱱ ᱢᱤᱫ 
ᱛᱤᱨᱞᱟᱹ ᱵᱤᱨᱩᱫᱽ ᱨᱮ ᱞᱟᱹᱞᱤᱥ ᱦᱩᱭ ᱟᱠᱟᱱᱟ ᱡᱮ, ᱚᱱᱢᱟᱱ 200 ᱥᱮᱨᱢᱟ 
ᱢᱟᱲᱟᱝ ᱠᱷᱚᱱ ᱟᱥᱟᱢᱤᱭᱟᱹᱦᱟᱜ ᱨᱚᱲ ᱤᱫᱤᱛᱮ ᱜᱷᱟᱨᱚᱸᱡᱽ ᱠᱚ ᱫᱷᱚᱨᱚᱢ 
ᱵᱚᱱᱚᱫᱚᱞ ᱦᱩᱭ ᱞᱮᱱᱟ, ᱚᱱᱟ ᱚᱡᱮᱛᱮ ᱱᱚᱶᱟ ᱟᱹᱱ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱵᱚᱱᱫᱮᱡᱽ ᱠᱚ 
ᱵᱟᱝ ᱦᱟᱛᱟᱣ ᱦᱩᱭ ᱟᱠᱟᱱᱟ ᱾ ᱮᱱᱦᱚᱸ ᱟᱹᱱ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱢᱤᱫᱴᱟᱝ ᱢᱟᱨᱟᱝ 
ᱯᱚᱨᱤᱢᱟᱱ ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱛᱮ ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱠᱚ ᱵᱟᱛᱟᱣᱟ ᱡᱮ, ᱥᱩᱢᱩᱝ ᱫᱷᱚᱨᱚᱢ ᱵᱚᱱᱚᱫᱚᱞ 
ᱠᱷᱟᱹᱛᱤᱨᱛᱮ ᱦᱚᱲ ᱛᱟᱹᱞᱤᱠᱟ ᱚᱱᱩᱥᱩᱪᱤᱛ ᱡᱚᱱᱚᱡᱟᱹᱛᱤ ᱨᱤᱱ ᱨᱟᱹᱥᱤᱭᱟᱹ 
ᱵᱟᱭ ᱦᱩᱭᱩᱜᱼᱟ, ᱢᱮᱱᱠᱷᱟᱱ ᱩᱱᱤ ᱚᱱᱟ ᱨᱮᱱ ᱨᱟᱹᱥᱤᱭᱟᱹ ᱵᱟᱝ ᱦᱩᱭᱩᱜᱼᱟ ᱥᱮ 
ᱵᱟᱝ ᱦᱩᱭᱩᱜᱼᱟ, ᱚᱱᱟ ᱯᱚᱨᱤᱢᱟᱱ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱯᱚᱨᱤᱢᱟᱱ ᱜᱚᱴᱟ ᱦᱩᱭᱩᱜ 
ᱞᱟᱹᱠᱛᱤ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ, ᱚᱡᱮ ᱫᱚ ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱱ ᱯᱚᱨᱤᱢᱟᱱ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱯᱚᱨᱤᱢᱟᱱ 
ᱡᱚᱛᱚ ᱠᱟᱹᱡᱽ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱠᱟᱛᱷᱟ ᱪᱮᱛᱟᱱ ᱨᱮ ᱴᱮᱦᱟᱰᱚᱜᱼᱟ ᱾ ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱱ 
ᱦᱟᱞᱟᱛ ᱨᱮ, ᱱᱚᱶᱟ ᱫᱚ ᱴᱷᱟᱹᱣᱠᱟᱹ ᱦᱩᱭᱩᱜᱼᱟ ᱡᱮ, ᱡᱟᱦᱟᱸᱭ ᱦᱚᱲ ᱮᱴᱟᱜ 
ᱫᱷᱚᱨᱚᱢ ᱠᱚ ᱦᱟᱛᱟᱣ ᱟᱠᱟᱫᱟ, ᱩᱱᱤ ᱱᱤᱛᱦᱚᱸ ᱥᱟᱶᱛᱟᱹᱨᱤ ᱵᱮᱼᱦᱟᱹᱞᱤᱥ ᱨᱮ 
ᱢᱮᱱᱟᱭᱼᱟ ᱟᱨ ᱟᱠᱳ ᱡᱟᱹᱛ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱞᱟᱭ ᱞᱟᱠᱪᱟᱨ ᱮ ᱯᱟᱸᱡᱟᱭᱮᱜᱼᱟ 
ᱡᱟᱦᱟᱸᱨᱮ ᱢᱟᱬᱟᱝ ᱛᱮᱠᱚ ᱛᱟᱦᱮᱸᱠᱟᱱᱟ, ᱩᱱᱠᱩᱫᱚ ᱟᱹᱫᱤᱵᱟᱹᱥᱤ ᱵᱚᱱᱫᱮᱡᱽ 
1950 ᱨᱤᱱ ᱜᱮᱠᱚ ᱦᱩᱭᱩᱜᱼᱟ ᱢᱤᱫ ᱦᱚᱲ ᱫᱤᱥᱚᱢ ᱜᱚᱢᱠᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱟᱸᱫᱮ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ 
ᱞᱟᱵᱽ ᱧᱟᱢ ᱞᱟᱹᱜᱤᱫ ᱛᱮ ᱟᱡᱟᱜ ᱮᱴᱟᱜ ᱠᱟᱨᱚᱱ ᱠᱷᱟᱹᱛᱤᱨ ᱮᱴᱟᱜ ᱫᱷᱚᱨᱚᱢ ᱮ 
ᱦᱟᱛᱟᱣ ᱠᱟᱜ ᱨᱮᱦᱚᱸ ᱪᱤ ᱩᱱᱠᱤᱱ ᱫᱚ ᱟᱠᱚᱣᱟᱜ ᱡᱟᱹᱛᱤᱭᱟᱹᱨᱤ ᱦᱚᱨᱟ ᱵᱟᱠᱚ 
ᱯᱟᱸᱡᱟᱭᱮᱫ ᱨᱮᱦᱚᱸ, ᱪᱤ ᱵᱟᱝᱠᱷᱟᱱ ᱟᱡᱫᱚ ᱟᱹᱫᱤᱵᱟᱹᱥᱤ ᱢᱮᱱᱛᱮ ᱵᱟᱠᱚ 
ᱦᱟᱛᱟᱣᱮ ᱨᱮᱦᱚᱸ ᱱᱚᱶᱟ ᱠᱮᱥ ᱨᱮ, ᱱᱚᱶᱟ ᱫᱚ ᱵᱟᱰᱟᱭᱚᱜ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ ᱡᱮ 
ᱟᱠᱚᱣᱟᱜ ᱜᱷᱟᱨᱚᱸᱡᱽ ᱫᱚ 200 ᱵᱚᱪᱷᱚᱨ ᱞᱟᱦᱟ ᱨᱮᱠᱚ ᱵᱚᱫᱚᱞ ᱟᱠᱟᱱᱟ 
ᱡᱩᱫᱤᱵᱟ ᱟᱡ ᱵᱟᱵᱟ ᱢᱤᱫ ᱨᱚᱢᱟᱱ ᱠᱮᱛᱷᱞᱤᱠ ᱠᱩᱲᱤᱭᱮ ᱵᱟᱯᱞᱟ ᱞᱮᱱᱟ ᱟᱨ 
ᱟᱡ ᱮ ᱨᱳᱢᱟᱱ ᱠᱮᱛᱷᱤᱞᱤᱠ ᱟᱠᱟᱱᱟ ᱼ ᱱᱚᱶᱟ ᱠᱩᱠᱞᱤ ᱨᱮᱠᱟᱵ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ ᱩᱱᱠᱩ 
ᱫᱚ ᱱᱤᱛ ᱟᱹᱫᱤᱵᱟᱹᱥᱤ ᱠᱟᱱᱟᱠᱚ ᱪᱤ ᱵᱟᱝ ᱚᱱᱟ ᱫᱚ ᱵᱤᱪᱟᱹᱨ ᱨᱮ 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2004] 1 S.C.R. 
ᱵᱟᱰᱟᱭᱚᱜᱼᱟ ᱼ ᱚᱱᱟ ᱠᱷᱟᱹᱛᱤᱨ ᱠᱮᱥ ᱵᱷᱮᱡᱟ ᱞᱮᱱᱟ ᱥᱮᱥᱚᱱ ᱠᱳᱴ ᱛᱮ ᱼ 
ᱥᱤᱧᱚᱛ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱵᱚᱱᱫᱮᱡᱽ 1950 ᱟᱹᱱᱟᱹᱨᱤ 341 ᱟᱨ 342 ᱥᱤᱧᱚᱛ ᱵᱚᱱᱫᱮᱡᱽ 
(ᱟᱹᱫᱤᱵᱟᱹᱥᱤ) ᱳᱰᱚᱨ 1950. 
ᱱᱤᱛᱚᱭᱟᱱᱚᱱᱫᱚ ᱥᱚᱨᱢᱟ ᱟᱨ ᱮᱴᱟᱜ ᱵᱚᱱᱟᱢ ᱵᱤᱦᱟᱨ ᱯᱚᱱᱚᱛ ᱟᱨ 
ᱮᱴᱟᱜ ᱠᱚ, [1996] 3 ᱮᱥ ᱥᱤ ᱥᱤ 576; ᱯᱩᱱᱤᱛ ᱨᱟᱭ ᱵᱚᱱᱟᱢ ᱫᱤᱱᱮᱥ 
ᱪᱚᱣᱫᱷᱚᱨᱤ, [2003] 8 ᱮᱥ ᱥᱤ ᱥᱤ 204; ᱮᱱ ᱤ  ᱦᱳᱨᱳ ᱵᱚᱱᱟᱢ  ᱥᱨᱤᱢᱚᱛᱤ 
ᱡᱟᱦᱟᱱ ᱟᱨᱟ ᱡᱚᱭᱯᱟᱞ ᱥᱤᱝ, AIR (1972) SC 1840; C. M. ᱟᱨᱩᱢᱩᱜᱚᱢ 
ᱵᱚᱱᱟᱢ ᱮᱥ ᱨᱟᱭᱜᱚᱯᱟᱞ ᱟᱨ ᱮᱴᱟᱜ ᱠᱚ, [1976] 1 ᱮᱥ ᱥᱤ ᱥᱤ 863; ᱤᱭᱩᱱᱤᱭᱚᱱ 
ᱚᱯᱷ ᱤᱱᱰᱤᱭᱟ ᱵᱚᱱᱟᱢ ᱱᱚᱵᱷᱤᱱ ᱡᱤᱱᱫᱚᱞ ᱟᱨ ᱮᱴᱟᱜ,  (2004) 1 ᱥᱠᱮᱞ ᱮᱞ 
677 ᱟᱨ ᱠᱟᱨᱛᱤᱠ ᱳᱨᱟᱣᱚᱱ ᱵᱚᱱᱟᱢ ᱰᱮᱵᱤᱰ ᱢᱩᱸᱡᱽᱱᱤ ᱟᱨ ᱮᱴᱟᱜ, AIR 
(1964) ᱯᱟᱴᱱᱟ 201ᱨᱮ ᱞᱟᱹᱭ ᱥᱚᱫᱚᱨ ᱟᱠᱟᱱᱟ ᱾  
 " ᱫᱟ ᱠᱟᱥᱴᱳᱢᱟᱨᱤ ᱞᱚᱞᱥ ᱚᱯ ᱫᱟ ᱢᱩᱱᱰᱟ ᱮᱱᱰ ᱫᱟ ᱳᱨᱟᱣᱚᱱ ', ᱚᱞ ᱞᱮᱫᱟᱭ 
ᱰᱨᱹ ᱡᱚᱭ ᱯᱨᱚᱠᱟᱥ ᱜᱩᱯᱛᱚ;' ᱴᱨᱟᱭᱵᱟᱞ ᱤᱱᱰᱤᱭᱟ, ᱮ ᱯᱨᱳᱯᱷᱟᱭᱤᱞ ᱤᱱ 
ᱤᱱᱰᱤᱭᱟ ᱮᱱᱛᱷᱚᱱᱳᱞᱳᱡᱤ ', ᱚᱞ ᱞᱮᱫᱟᱭ ᱠᱮ ᱮᱞ ᱵᱷᱳᱢᱤᱠ; "ᱠᱟᱥᱴ ᱮᱱᱰ ᱫᱤ 
ᱞᱚ ᱤᱱ ᱤᱱᱰᱤᱭᱟ", S.B. Wad ᱥᱟᱦᱴᱟ 30; ‘ᱥᱚᱨᱚᱛ ᱪᱚᱸᱫᱨᱚ ᱨᱟᱭᱟᱜ 
'ᱳᱨᱟᱣᱚᱱ 
ᱨᱤᱞᱤᱡᱤᱭᱚᱱ 
ᱮᱱᱰ 
ᱠᱟᱥᱴᱚᱢᱥ', 
W.H.R 
ᱨᱤᱵᱷᱟᱨᱥ 
ᱟᱜ 
ᱮᱱᱥᱟᱭᱠᱞᱳᱯᱤᱰᱤᱭᱟ ᱵᱨᱤᱴᱟᱱᱤᱠᱟ, volume 22ᱼ1961 ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱵᱷᱚᱞᱤᱭᱩᱢ 
ᱨᱮ ᱞᱟᱹᱭ ᱥᱚᱫᱚᱨ ᱟᱠᱟᱱᱟ ᱾  
 ᱠᱨᱤᱢᱤᱱᱟᱞ ᱮᱯᱮᱞᱞᱮᱴ ᱡᱩᱨᱤᱥᱰᱤᱠᱥᱚᱱ ᱾ 1997 ᱥᱟᱹᱦᱤᱛ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ 
ᱠᱨᱤᱢᱤᱱᱟᱞ ᱮᱯᱤᱞ ᱱᱟᱢᱵᱟᱨ 240 ᱾  
1994 ᱥᱟᱹᱦᱤᱛ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱠᱮᱨᱚᱲ ᱦᱟᱹᱭ ᱠᱳᱨᱴ Crl. M.C. No. 516 
ᱢᱟᱹᱦᱤᱛ 19.03.96 ᱵᱤᱪᱟᱹᱨ ᱨᱟᱭ ᱟᱨ ᱟᱸᱫᱮ ᱠᱷᱚᱱ ᱵᱟᱰᱟᱭ ᱟᱠᱟᱱᱟ᱾   
ᱮᱯᱤᱞᱮᱱᱴ ᱠᱚ ᱞᱟᱹᱜᱤᱫ ᱨᱚᱢᱮᱥ ᱵᱟᱹᱵᱩ ᱮᱢ. ᱟᱨ. ᱾ 
ᱨᱟᱡᱤᱵᱽ ᱥᱚᱠᱫᱷᱚᱨ, ᱢᱟᱹᱱᱤᱡ ᱯᱨᱚᱥᱟᱱᱛᱷᱤ ᱯᱨᱚᱥᱟᱫᱽ, ᱠᱮ ᱴᱤ ᱮᱥ 
ᱞᱮᱠᱷᱟ ᱟᱨ ᱢᱚᱱᱳᱡᱽ ᱯᱨᱚᱥᱟᱫᱽ ᱨᱮᱥᱯᱚᱱᱰᱮᱱᱴ ᱾  
ᱦᱚᱨᱠᱚᱞᱟ ᱞᱟᱹᱜᱤᱫ ᱛᱮ ᱢᱟᱛᱷᱟᱭ ᱯᱮᱠᱟᱰᱮ, ᱥᱤᱵᱤ ᱥᱮᱵᱟᱥᱴᱤᱭᱟᱱ 
ᱟᱨ ᱮᱢ ᱴᱤ ᱡᱳᱨᱡᱽ ᱾  
ᱠᱳᱨᱴ ᱡᱟᱦᱟᱸ ᱨᱟᱭ ᱮ ᱮᱢᱞᱮᱜᱼᱟ ᱾ ᱚᱱᱟ ᱞᱟᱛᱟᱨ ᱨᱮ ᱢᱮᱱᱟᱜᱼᱟ᱾  
ᱢᱤᱫ ᱦᱚᱲ ᱨᱟᱢᱚᱪᱚᱸᱫᱽᱨᱚᱱ, ᱡᱟᱦᱟᱸᱭ ᱫᱚ ᱯᱮᱴᱟᱢᱵᱤ ᱠᱚᱝᱜᱨᱮᱥ 
ᱢᱟᱱᱰᱚᱞᱚᱢ ᱨᱤᱱ ᱯᱟᱨᱥᱮᱛ ᱮ ᱛᱟᱸᱦᱮ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ, ᱩᱱᱤ ᱨᱮᱥᱯᱚᱱᱰᱮᱱᱴ ᱵᱤᱨᱩᱫᱽ 
ᱨᱮ ᱢᱤᱫᱴᱟᱝ ᱞᱟᱹᱞᱤᱥ ᱮᱢ ᱞᱮᱫᱟᱭ ᱡᱮ, 1992 ᱥᱟᱹᱦᱤᱛ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ 24 ᱟᱱ 
ᱚᱠᱴᱳᱵᱚᱨ ᱢᱟᱦᱟᱸ ᱨᱮ ᱨᱮᱥᱯᱚᱱᱰᱮᱱᱴ ᱮᱞᱤᱡᱟᱵᱮᱛ ᱯᱤ ᱠᱳᱨᱟ ᱧᱩᱛᱩᱢ ᱛᱮ 8 
ᱥᱮᱨᱢᱟ ᱨᱤᱱᱤᱡ ᱢᱤᱫ ᱠᱩᱲᱤ ᱦᱚᱯᱚᱱ ᱫᱚ ᱛᱟᱨᱟᱥᱤᱧ 3.30 ᱚᱠᱛᱚ ᱨᱮ 
ᱯᱟᱛᱚᱢᱵᱤ ᱥᱚᱨᱠᱟᱨᱟᱜ ᱤᱭᱩᱯᱤ ᱵᱤᱨᱫᱟᱹᱜᱟᱲ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱥᱮᱪᱮᱫ ᱢᱤᱫᱴᱟᱝ 
STATE OF KERALA v. CHANDRAMOHANAN 
ᱠᱩᱴᱨᱤ ᱨᱮ ᱵᱟᱹᱲᱤᱡ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ ᱩᱭᱦᱟᱹᱨ ᱤᱫᱤ ᱞᱮᱫᱮᱭᱟᱭ ᱾ 1992 ᱥᱟᱹᱦᱤᱛ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ 
11 ᱱᱚᱵᱷᱮᱢᱵᱚᱨ ᱨᱮ, ᱱᱚᱶᱟ ᱞᱟᱹᱞᱤᱥ ᱫᱚ ᱵᱷᱟᱨᱚᱛ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱞᱟᱹᱞᱤᱥ ᱟᱹᱨᱤ 
ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ 509 ᱥᱟᱭᱦᱤᱸᱥ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱟᱶᱛᱟᱨᱮ ᱯᱩᱭᱞᱩ ᱵᱟᱰᱟᱭ ᱛᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱨᱤᱯᱚᱨᱴ 
ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱛᱮ ᱠᱚ ᱢᱟᱱᱟᱣ ᱞᱮᱫᱟ ᱾ᱛᱟᱭᱚᱢ ᱫᱟᱨᱟᱢ ᱛᱮ 1992 ᱥᱟᱹᱦᱤᱛ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ 21 
ᱟᱱ ᱱᱚᱵᱷᱮᱢᱵᱚᱨ ᱨᱮ ᱛᱳᱞᱟᱥᱤᱭᱟᱹ ᱚᱯᱷᱤᱥᱚᱨ ᱠᱚ ᱵᱟᱰᱟᱭ ᱧᱟᱢ ᱞᱮᱫᱟ ᱡᱮ, 
ᱱᱟᱦᱟᱪᱟᱨ ᱟᱠᱟᱱ ᱦᱚᱲᱤᱡ ᱵᱟᱵᱟ ᱫᱚ ᱢᱟᱞᱟ ᱟᱨᱤᱭᱟᱱ ᱜᱟᱫᱮᱞ ᱨᱤᱱᱤᱡ, 
ᱡᱟᱦᱟᱸᱭ ᱫᱚ ᱠᱮᱨᱚᱲ ᱯᱚᱱᱚᱛ ᱨᱮ ᱚᱱᱩᱥᱩᱪᱤᱛ ᱡᱚᱱᱚᱡᱟᱹᱛᱤ ᱢᱮᱱᱛᱮ ᱢᱚᱱᱮ 
ᱦᱩᱭᱩᱜ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ, ᱟᱨ ᱮᱴᱟᱜ ᱵᱟᱰᱟᱭ ᱛᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱯᱩᱭᱞᱩ ᱛᱟᱹᱞᱤᱠᱟ ᱨᱮ ᱞᱟᱹᱞᱤᱥ 
ᱮ ᱚᱞ ᱞᱮᱫᱟ, ᱡᱟᱸᱦᱟ ᱫᱚ ᱮᱴᱟᱜ ᱦᱚᱲ ᱪᱮᱛᱟᱱ ᱚᱱᱩᱥᱩᱪᱤᱛ ᱡᱚᱱᱚᱡᱟᱹᱛᱤ ᱟᱨ 
ᱚᱱᱩᱥᱩᱪᱤᱛ ᱡᱟᱹᱛᱤ (ᱯᱨᱤᱵᱷᱮᱱᱥᱚᱱ ᱚᱯ ᱮᱴᱨᱚᱥᱤᱴᱤ), ᱥᱮᱠᱥᱚᱱ 1989 ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ 
ᱥᱮᱠᱥᱚᱱ 3 (1) (xi) ᱨᱮ ᱞᱟᱹᱞᱤᱥ ᱮ ᱥᱚᱫᱚᱨ ᱞᱮᱫᱟ ᱾ ᱞᱟᱹᱭ ᱟᱠᱟᱱ ᱯᱩᱭᱞᱩ 
ᱵᱟᱰᱟᱭ ᱛᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱛᱚᱛᱩᱛᱚᱱ ᱰᱚᱜᱚᱨ ᱪᱮᱛᱟᱱ ᱴᱮᱦᱟᱰ ᱠᱟᱛᱮ, ᱢᱩᱲᱩᱫ 
ᱡᱩᱰᱤᱥᱤᱟᱞ ᱢᱟᱡᱤᱥᱴᱨᱮᱴ ᱟᱡᱟᱜ ᱵᱤᱨᱩᱫᱽᱨᱮ ᱟᱹᱱ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ 3 (1) (xi) ᱥᱟᱶ 
ᱥᱟᱶᱛᱮ ᱵᱷᱟᱨᱚᱛ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱞᱟᱹᱞᱤᱥ ᱟᱹᱨᱤ  ᱥᱮᱠᱥᱚᱱ 509 ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱟᱶᱛᱟᱨᱮ 
ᱞᱟᱹᱞᱤᱥ ᱮ ᱦᱟᱛᱟᱣ ᱞᱮᱫᱟ ᱾ ᱞᱟᱹᱞᱤᱥ ᱧᱟᱢ ᱠᱟᱛᱮ ᱮᱴᱟᱜ ᱦᱚᱲ ᱫᱚ ᱟᱹᱱ 
ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ 3 (1) (xi) ᱨᱮ ᱵᱮᱱᱟᱣ ᱟᱠᱟᱱ ᱞᱟᱹᱞᱤᱥ ᱠᱚ ᱵᱟᱹᱛᱤᱞ ᱞᱟᱹᱜᱤᱫ 
ᱠᱨᱤᱢᱤᱱᱟᱞ  ᱯᱨᱚᱥᱤᱰᱤᱭᱚᱨ ᱠᱳᱰ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱥᱮᱠᱥᱚᱱ 482 ᱨᱮ ᱢᱤᱫᱴᱟᱝ 
ᱞᱟᱹᱞᱤᱥ ᱮᱢ ᱞᱮᱫᱟᱭ ᱾ ᱦᱟᱭᱠᱳᱨᱴ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱠᱟᱛᱷ

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.