STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS. versus TATA STEEL LTD. & ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
[2016] 1 S.C.R. 931 STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS. v. TATA STEEL LTD. & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 4285 of2007) FEBRUARY 12, 2016 [DIPAK MISRA AND N.V. RAMANA, JJ.] Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005 - s. 95(3)(ii) - Deferment/Exemption of tax - Benefit of - For industrial units - Units of I" responde/1/ granted benefit of exemption from payment of sales tax for 8 years - Units availed tax exemption from 01.08.2000 to 31.03.2006. for 6 years - Thereafter. JVAT Act withdrew exemption but allowed deferment of tax for the remaining period from 01.04.2006 to 31.07.2008 - Application by ]" respondent for conversion from exemption of tax to deferment of A B c tax for the remaining period as also challenging the withdrawal of D exemption - Application rejected - In appeal, the High Court granted deferment of tax, however. upheld the withdrawal of exemption - On appeal, held: Notifica(ion lays a clear postulate that repayment of total deferred amount shall have to be done in ten equal six monthly instalments in such a manner so as to be completed within 13 years from the date of start of deferment - Words "from the date of start of deferment" have to have nexus with the policy stated in the beginning'_ In the instant case. period of exemption has been converted to period of deferment of tax - It is for 8 years - Repayme/1/ schedule is 5 years from the expiry of eligibility period of deferment - Period of 5 years has to be so arranged that it does not go beyond 13 years from the date of deferment- Thus, the repayment schedule has to end on 31.08.2013 within a span of 5 years from the expiration of the eligibility period - Owing to special features, no penalty imposed - Assessee had ยท already deposited the amount in pursuance of the order of this Court - As such the assessee to pay 12% inrerest per annum - Bihar Finance Act, 1981 - s. 23A - Jharkhand Value Added Tax Rules. 2006 - rr. 64, 66. Disposing of the appeal, the Court E F G HELD: 1.1 Section 95(3)(ii) of the Jharkhand Value Added H 931 - 932 A B c D E F G H SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] I S.C.R. Tax Act, 2005 envisages that a registered dealer who was enjoying the benefit of exemption of tax is allowed to convert the facility of exemption from payment of tax under the JVAT Act into the facility of deferment of payment of tax for the unexpired period. The assessee-company has availed the deferment and paid the amount of tax. [Para 15][943-F] 1.2 Benefit of deferment of tax is granted under certain terms and conditions. One of the terms and conditions pertains to repayment of deferment of tax amount by the industrial unit. The first part of sub-para (1) of para 5 stipulates that the repayment of deferred tax amount shall have to be done after the completion of eligibility period of deferment or the prescribed percentage limit of fixed capital investment, whichever reaches earlier. In the instant case, the period of exemption has been converted to period of deferment of tax. It is for 8 years. The assessee had availed the exemption for a period of 6 years and he is entitled to deferment of tax for the rest of the period which commenced in 2006. [Para 27][949-E-F] 1.3 The notification lays a clear postulate that repayment of total deferred amount shall have to be done in ten equal six monthly instalments in such a manner so as to be completed within 13 years from the date of start of deferment. The words "from the date of start of deferment" have to have nexus with the policy stated in the beginning. The policy would apply if the unit has commenced between 01.09.1995 and 31.08.2000; that it has a registration certification from the prescribed authority and that, most importantly, it has been given an eligibility certificate for the said purpose. The policy would come into play only if these conditions are satisfied and then the assessee will be allowed to have the benefit of deferment of sales tax on the sale of manufactured finished goods for a prescribed period. Therefore, the authority has been given the power to lay down the prescribed period for grant of deferment. In the beginning, the l" respondent was granted exemptioP. The concept of exemption is distinct from the concept of deferment of tax. After the JVAT Act came into force, under the statutory provisions, there was no exemption and beneficiaries were entitled to convert to the scheme of deferment. The period remains intact, that i
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex