LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ETC. versus DR. P. A. BHATT & ORS. ETC.

Citation: [2023] 5 S.C.R. 301 · Decided: 26-04-2023 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

cites 3 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
301
[2023] 5 S.C.R. 301
301
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ETC.
v.
DR. P. A. BHATT & ORS. ETC.
(Civil Appeal Nos. 8553-8557 of 2014)
APRIL 26, 2023
[V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND PANKAJ MITHAL, JJ.]
Service Law : Equal Pay – Allopathy doctors and doctors of
indigenous medicine-, if can be said to be performing “equal work”
so as to be entitled to “equal pay Non-MBBS medical officers seeked
extension of the benefit of higher scales of pay on parity with the
allopathic doctors on the basis of the recommendations of Tikku
Pay Commission – – Held: Classification based upon educational
qualification for the grant of higher pay scale, is a valid
classification – Both categories of doctors are certainly not
performing equal work to be entitled to equal pay.
Pay scales – Appointment of officers to the same post in a
cadre – Fixation of different scales of pay on the basis of educational
qualifications possessed by them – Held: Classification based upon
educational qualification for the grant of higher pay scale, is a
valid classification – Thus, the classification based upon educational
qualification is not violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
Allowing the appeals, the Court
HELD: 1.1 The classification based upon educational
qualification is not violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the
Constitution. Hence, the answer to Issue No.1 that Whether
different scales of pay can be fixed for officers appointed to the
same cadre, on the basis of the educational qualifications
possessed by them would be in favour of the State and against
the respondents. [Para 37][314-D-E]
1.2 Allopathy doctors are required to perform emergency
duties and to provide trauma care. By the very nature of the
science that they practice and with the advancement of science
and modern medical technology, 23 the emergency duty that
Allopathy doctors are capable of performing and the trauma care
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
302
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
[2023] 5 S.C.R.
that they are capable of providing, cannot be performed by
Ayurved doctors. [Para 43][316-D-E]
1.3 It is also not possible for Ayurved doctors to assist
surgeons performing complicated surgeries, while MBBS doctors
can assist. This Court shall not be understood to mean as though
one system of medicine is superior to the other. It is not the
mandate nor within competence of this Court to assess the
relative merits of these two systems of medical sciences. As a
matter of fact, this Court is conscious that the history of Ayurveda
dates back to several centuries. The Encyclopaedia Britannica
states that the golden age of Indian medicine from 800 B.C., till
1000 A.D., was marked by the production of two medical treatises
known as “caraka-samhita” and “susruta-samhita”. [Para 44][316-
E-G]
1.4 Every alternative system of medicine may have its pride
of place in history. But today, the practitioners of indigenous
systems of medicine do not perform complicated surgical
operations. A study of Ayurved does not authorise them to perform
these surgeries. [Para 49][319-B-C]
1.5 A post-mortem or autopsy is not carried out by/in the
presence of Ayurved doctors. Section 174 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 19738 deals with the procedure for the police to
inquire and report on suicide, etc. Sub-section (3) of Section 174
mandates that the police officer shall, subject to such rules as
the State Government may prescribe, forward the dead body, with
a view to its being examined, to the nearest Civil Surgeon, or
other qualified medical man appointed in this behalf by the State
Government, in certain types of cases such as, (i) suicide by a
woman within seven years of marriage; (ii) death of a woman within
seven years of marriage in certain circumstances; and (iii) cases
where there are any doubts regarding the cause of death. Section
176 of Cr.P.C deals with inquiry by Magistrates into cause of
death. Sub-section (5) of Section 176 uses similar words namely
“Civil Surgeon or other qualified medical man”. The AYUSH
doctors are normally not notified as competent to perform post-
mortem. [Paras 50, 51][319-C-F]
1.6 It is common knowledge that during out-patient days
(OPD) in general hospitals in cities/towns, MBBS doctors are
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
303
made to attend to hundreds of patients, which is not the case
with Ayurveda doctors. In the comparative chart extracted, the
State of Gujarat have claimed that IV injections and ART injections
cannot be administered by Ayurved doctors. [Paras 52-53][319-
F-H]
1.7 Even while re

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.