STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR versus J.A.C. SALDANHA AND ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A c 16 STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. v. J.A.C. SALDANHA AND ORS. November 13, 1979 fR. S. SARKARL.\, D. A. DESAI AND 0. CHJNN\I'PA REDDY, JJ.] Investigation by Police-Further investigation in case in which one investf. patin~, of(:'ccr bud sul;n1ittnl a final r·cpon under section 172(2) of Crilninal Procedure Code, 1973, but on which the Court had not passed any order- Whether the State Government is precluded from directing further investigation in 1/ic case-Sections 2(h), 2(r), 36 156(1) and (2) and 193(8) of the Crimi- nal Procedure Code, 1973 r /w Sectz'ons 1, 3, 12 and 22 of the Indian Police Act, 1861-Wherher E.G. of Police Vigilance, a ~superior" officer in rank for the purpose of section 36 of the Code-Power of Magistrate under s. 156 of the Code. D Words and pfi..-ases-"superintendcnce" in 11:ctio11 3 of Indian Police Act, E F G H 1861, meaning of. Investigation-Court's duty in interfering in a Criminal matter at the stage of h1vestigation. A First Information Report alleging loss of legitimate revenues due .to the railway by defrauding it with the connivance of railway officials either by loading pearl coke without being booked according to railway rules in the empty wagons after the man_ganese ore in them were unloaded at Adityapur in Tatanagar, a railway siding of the Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. or by diverting \vithout regular booking of tanks containing furnace oil. was lodged on March 11, 1977, consequent upon which a case was registered at Tatanagar G.R.P.S. disclosing offences under sections 420/120B, 418 and 368 Indian Penal Code and sections 105 /106 of the Indian Railways Act, against 9 persons. One S. R. I. Rizvi. Inspector of Railway Police, S. E. Railway Tatanagar con1menced investigation into the offences under the general supervision of R. P. Singh S.P. Railway Police appellant in Cr!. Appeal No. 300 /79 and Respondent 6 in Cr!. Appeal No. 301 f79. The D.I.G. Railway Police who was the immediate superior of Respondent 6, wrote a letter to the D.l.G., C.l.D., Bihar on May 11, !977 requesting him to entrust the investigation to the Central Bureau of investigation. but the Inspector General of Police, Bihar, as per his letter dated June 24, 1977, declined the request. In the meantime on June 16, 1977 on a complaint from one Mr. Rusi 1\..Iodi representative of TISCO, at Patna· to the Chief Secretary to the Government a1leging harassment of TISCO officials by respondent 6 and requesting for appropriate steps, the cabinet took the decision to transfer respondent 6. One Sbri R. H. Modi who was required to appear before the Investigating Officer, made some enquiry by his Jetter dated '!'Iovi;-mber 4 1977 which was copied to some higher police officers including Respondent 2, Inspector General of Police, Bihar, acting on the copy of that letter requested Respondent 3, Add!. I.G., C.I.D. to look into the com~laint of f > ' • ' BIHAR V. J.A.C. SALDANHA 17 Mr. 1\-Iodi. The third respondent sent a telegraphic communication to RespoQ- A dent. 6 informing him that the investigation of the aforesaid offences had been taken over by the c·J.D. . The Com1nissioner, South Chhota Nagpur Division, Ranchi, on a request made by the Secretary to Government of Bihar (Home) Police departn1cnt enquired into the · allegations made by officers of TISCO dgainst respOndent 6 and, after consultations with D.l.G .. Railway, the irnrr1e- t.Iiate su.perior of Respondent 6 submitted his report dated December 27, i977 giving a clean chit to Respondent 6. In the meantime, there was another appli- B cation from M.L.As and M.L.Cs seven in all addressed to the Inspector General of Police, Vigilance, Bibar making serious a.llegations against the inves~igation made by the C.I.D. under the supervision of respondent - 3, whereupon the Chief' Secretary to Government of Bihar submitted a note to the Chief f\.Iinister on August 28, 1978 suggesting that the case involved in the matter be handed Over to the CBI for illquiry. This note Was approved and signed by the Chief j ~finister on the same day. In the meantime, the Chief Secretary by his letter C dated September 2, 1978 directed respondent 3 to send all papers of the case with a note indicating the stage of investigation. to him and in compliance there~ · \\'ith respondent 3 sent all papers of investigation till then done ·to the Chief Secretary with his covering letter dated September II, 1978. The CBI de
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex